BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-26605High confidence

PCI/ASPM: Fix deadlock when enabling ASPM

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.90-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.7.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-23867

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI/ASPM: Fix deadlock when enabling ASPM A last minute revert in 6.7-final introduced a potential deadlock when enabling ASPM during probe of Qualcomm PCIe controllers as reported by lockdep: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0 #40 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u16:5/90 is trying to acquire lock: ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc but task is already holding lock: ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pci_walk_bus+0x34/0xbc other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(pci_bus_sem); lock(pci_bus_sem); *** DEADLOCK *** Call trace: print_deadlock_bug+0x25c/0x348 __lock_acquire+0x10a4/0x2064 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x318 down_read+0x60/0x184 pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc pci_set_full_power_state+0xa8/0x114 pci_set_power_state+0xc4/0x120 qcom_pcie_enable_aspm+0x1c/0x3c [pcie_qcom] pci_walk_bus+0x64/0xbc qcom_pcie_host_post_init_2_7_0+0x28/0x34 [pcie_qcom] The deadlock can easily be reproduced on machines like the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s by adding a delay to increase the race window during asynchronous probe where another thread can take a write lock. Add a new pci_set_power_state_locked() and associated helper functions that can be called with the PCI bus semaphore held to avoid taking the read lock twice.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI/ASPM: Fix deadlock when enabling ASPM A last minute revert in 6.7-final introduced a potential deadlock when enabling ASPM during probe of Qualcomm PCIe controllers as reported by lockdep: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0 #40 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u16:5/90 is trying to acquire lock: ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc but task is already holding lock: ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pci_walk_bus+0x34/0xbc other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(pci_bus_sem); lock(pci_bus_sem); *** DEADLOCK *** Call trace: print_deadlock_bug+0x25c/0x348 __lock_acquire+0x10a4/0x2064 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x318 down_read+0x60/0x184 pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc pci_set_full_power_state+0xa8/0x114 pci_set_power_state+0xc4/0x120 qcom_pcie_enable_aspm+0x1c/0x3c [pcie_qcom] pci_walk_bus+0x64/0xbc qcom_pcie_host_post_init_2_7_0+0x28/0x34 [pcie_qcom] The deadlock can easily be reproduced on machines like the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s by adding a delay to increase the race window during asynchronous probe where another thread can take a write lock. Add a new pci_set_power_state_locked() and associated helper functions that can be called with the PCI bus semaphore held to avoid taking the read lock twice.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI/ASPM: Fix deadlock when enabling ASPM A last minute revert in 6.7-final introduced a potential deadlock when enabling ASPM during probe of Qualcomm PCIe controllers as reported by lockdep: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0 #40 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u16:5/90 is trying to acquire lock: ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc but task is already holding lock: ffffacfa78ced000 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: pci_walk_bus+0x34/0xbc other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(pci_bus_sem); lock(pci_bus_sem); *** DEADLOCK *** Call trace: print_deadlock_bug+0x25c/0x348 __lock_acquire+0x10a4/0x2064 lock_acquire+0x1e8/0x318 down_read+0x60/0x184 pcie_aspm_pm_state_change+0x58/0xdc pci_set_full_power_state+0xa8/0x114 pci_set_power_state+0xc4/0x120 qcom_pcie_enable_aspm+0x1c/0x3c [pcie_qcom] pci_walk_bus+0x64/0xbc qcom_pcie_host_post_init_2_7_0+0x28/0x34 [pcie_qcom] The deadlock can easily be reproduced on machines like the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s by adding a delay to increase the race window during asynchronous probe where another thread can take a write lock. Add a new pci_set_power_state_locked() and associated helper functions that can be called with the PCI bus semaphore held to avoid taking the read lock twice.

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0475Linux-Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und unspezifische Angriffe

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder einen nicht spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240228Security Bulletin 28 Feb 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 28 Feb 2024, published on 28 February 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2024-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-22195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25743 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26672 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2024-22018 Référence CVE CVE-2024-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-22195 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22195 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24864 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25740 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25743 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26647 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26648 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26658 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26672 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26691 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2024-24859 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25062 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25260 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26458 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26461 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26462 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26603 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26603 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26618 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26621 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26631 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26637 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26649 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26649 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0381Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian

d?id=CVE-2024-23851 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24858 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24861 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26581 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26593 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26601 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26601 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26602 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26602 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26605 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26614 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26615 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26625 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26627 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-003093Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: b9c370b61d735a0e5390c42771e7eb21413f7868 < 0f7908a016c092cfdaa16d785fa5099d867bc1a3, 8cc22ba3f77c59df5f1ac47d62df51efb28cd868 < b0f4478838be1f1d330061201898fef65bf8fd7c, f93e71aea6c60ebff8adbd8941e678302d377869 < ef90508574d7af48420bdc5f7b9a4f1cdd26bc70, f93e71aea6c60ebff8adbd8941e678302d377869 < 1e560864159d002b453da42bd2c13a1805515a20, 1f2f662c8bec75d1311e063efaa9107435cf16c8, 6.1.72 < 6.1.88, 6.6.11 < 6.6.29, 5.15.147 < 5.16, 6.7
Fixed
Linux: < 6.7, 6.1.88 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.6.29 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7.5 ≤ 6.7.*, 6.8 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Feb 2024 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:35 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-23867
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-26605 · cve.blacktree.nl