BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2024-24795High confidence

Apache HTTP Server: HTTP Response Splitting in multiple modules

Apache Software Foundation · Apache HTTP Server

6.3MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 2.87% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Apache Software Foundation Apache HTTP Server and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

12 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 4 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainapache2Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.4.59-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainapache2Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.4.59-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainapache2Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.4.59-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceapache2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.59-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourceuwsgiAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceapache2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.59-1~deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourceuwsgiAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceapache2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.59-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourceuwsgiAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceapache2Vendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.4.59-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourceuwsgiAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archiveapache2Vendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.2.4.58-1ubuntu8.1Canonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2024-24795 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityhttpd: HTTP Response Splitting in multiple modules
42 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • httpd.src as a component of OpenShift Pipelines
  • httpd as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • httpd-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • httpd-manual as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • httpd-tools as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • httpd.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • mod_ssl as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • httpd as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • httpd-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • httpd-manual as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • httpd-tools as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • httpd.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Summary
A flaw was found in httpd. An HTTP response splitting in multiple httpd modules may allow an attacker that can inject malicious response headers into backend applications to cause an HTTP desynchronization attack.
Remediation
Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
SSA-331112 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-331112: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SINEC NMS Before V3.0 SP1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SINEC NMS
Summary
HTTP Response splitting in multiple modules in Apache HTTP Server allows an attacker that can inject malicious response headers into backend applications to cause an HTTP desynchronization attack. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.59, which fixes this issue.
Remediation
Update to V3.0 SP1 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-22171

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

HTTP Response splitting in multiple modules in Apache HTTP Server allows an attacker that can inject malicious response headers into backend applications to cause an HTTP desynchronization attack. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.59, which fixes this issue.

What

HTTP Response splitting in multiple modules in Apache HTTP Server allows an attacker that can inject malicious response headers into backend applications to cause an HTTP desynchronization attack. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.59, which fixes this issue.

Why

The product receives data from an HTTP agent/component (e.g., web server, proxy, browser, etc.), but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CR and LF characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

HTTP Response splitting in multiple modules in Apache HTTP Server allows an attacker that can inject malicious response headers into backend applications to cause an HTTP desynchronization attack. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.59, which fixes this issue.

Why

The product receives data from an HTTP agent/component (e.g., web server, proxy, browser, etc.), but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CR and LF characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-113 ↗

CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting'). The product receives data from an HTTP agent/component (e.g., web server, proxy, browser, etc.), but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CR and LF characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-113
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1725Apple macOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apple macOS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, Daten zu modifizieren, den Benutzer zu täuschen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen und vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1248Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität des Systems zu gefährden

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0801Apache HTTP Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Manipulation von Daten

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apache HTTP Server ausnutzen, um Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240410Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Apr 2024, published on 10 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0855Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Juniper Networks

Record?id=CVE-2024-1737 Référence CVE CVE-2024-1975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21208 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21208 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21210 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21217 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21235 Référence CVE CVE-2024-21823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-21823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-22025 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22025 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2236 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24806 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26327 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26600 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26600 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26828 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0158Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits NetApp

ord?id=CVE-2021-42381 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42382 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42383 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42383 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42384 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42385 Référence CVE CVE-2021-42386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42386 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-47629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-47629 Référence CVE CVE-2023-38709 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38709 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27316 Référence CVE CVE-2024-51562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-51562 Référence CVE CVE-2024-51563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-51563 Référence CVE CVE-2024-51564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-51564 Référence CVE CVE-2024-51565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-51565 Référence CVE CVE-2024-51566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-51566 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0373 Référence CVE CVE-2025-0374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0634Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Apple

g/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38709 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52356 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6277 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2004 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23261 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23296 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23296 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2379 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2398 Référence CVE CVE-2024-2466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2466 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24795 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27316 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27804 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27823 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27826 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27862 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27871 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27871 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27872 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0475Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Security Center

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Tenable Security Center. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une injection de code indirecte à distance (XSS).

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0274Multiples vulnérabilités dans Apache HTTP Server

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Apache HTTP Server . Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2024-025501Apache Software Foundation の Apache HTTP Server 等複数ベンダの製品における HTTP レスポンス分割に関する脆弱性

Apache Software Foundation の Apache HTTP Server 等複数ベンダの製品には、HTTP レスポンス分割に関する脆弱性、HTTP リクエストスマグリングに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0433Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

De kwetsbaarheden stellen een kwaadwillende mogelijk in staat aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade: - Denial-of-Service (DoS) - Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) - Manipulatie van gegevens - Omzeilen van een beveiligingsmaatregel - Omzeilen van authenticatie - (Remote) code execution (Administrator/Root rechten) - (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten) - Toegang tot systeemgegevens - Verhoogde gebruikersrechten De kwaadwillende heeft hiervoor toegang nodig tot de productieomgeving. Het is goed gebruik een dergelijke omgeving niet publiek toegankelijk te hebben.

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0320Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Apple MacOS

Een kwaadwillende kan de kwetsbaarheden misbruiken om een beveiligingsmaatregel te omzeilen, zichzelf verhoogde rechten toe te kennen, toegang te krijgen tot gevoelige gegevens, willekeurige code uit te voeren, mogelijk met kernel-rechten of een Denial-of-Service te veroorzaken. Voor succesvol misbruik moet de kwaadwillende het slachtoffer misleiden een malafide app te installeren en draaien, of een malafide link te volgen. Voor het uitvoeren van willekeurige code met kernel-rechten moet de kwaadwillende reeds beschikken over verhoogde rechten op het kwetsbare systeem.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Apr 2024 · Last source change 12 Nov 2024, 19:48 UTC · CWE-113 · Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-22171
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    2.4.0 ≤ 2.4.58 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    2.4.0 ≤ 2.4.58 · Fixed: Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release recorded from official guidance
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-22171↗Red Hat Product Security security advisory↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2024-24795 · cve.blacktree.nl