Patch only the product branches with a verified fix
Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 7 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Published severityMedium→Operational priority:High, raised one band.upgradedsince 13 Feb 2025
Evidence used
No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
EPSS is 1.33% for the current model date.
Compensating controls
Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.
Verification
Confirm that the asset runs curl curl and falls inside the recorded affected range.
Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Cross-source reconciliation
Remediation availability differs by product scope
Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 7 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Siemens ProductCERT: 5 affected or under-investigation product states without a fixed product state in the same current advisory
Siemens ProductCERT: 1 affected or under-investigation product state without a fixed product state in the same current advisory
Siemens ProductCERT: 1 affected or under-investigation product state without a fixed product state in the same current advisory
Distribution package intelligence
Release-specific package status
Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.
7 package states
Repository candidate not checked
A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.
Distribution release
Source package
Vendor state
Fixed version
Evidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · main
curl
Vendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.
Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.
4 current
CVE-2024-2466 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitycurl: TLS certificate check bypass with mbedTLS
76 fixed
The vendor explicitly identifies these products or versions as containing the fix.
jbcs-httpd24-curl-0:8.7.1-2.el7jbcs.src as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-curl-0:8.7.1-2.el7jbcs.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-curl-debuginfo-0:8.7.1-2.el7jbcs.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-httpd-0:2.4.57-10.el7jbcs.src as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-httpd-0:2.4.57-10.el7jbcs.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-httpd-debuginfo-0:2.4.57-10.el7jbcs.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-httpd-devel-0:2.4.57-10.el7jbcs.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-httpd-manual-0:2.4.57-10.el7jbcs.noarch as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-httpd-selinux-0:2.4.57-10.el7jbcs.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-httpd-tools-0:2.4.57-10.el7jbcs.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-libcurl-0:8.7.1-2.el7jbcs.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
jbcs-httpd24-libcurl-devel-0:8.7.1-2.el7jbcs.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat JBoss Core Services on RHEL 7 Server
Summary
A flaw was found in curl. When curl is built to use mbedTLS as the TLS backend, it does not check the server certificate of TLS connections done to a host specified as an IP address.
Remediation
Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected
The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.
SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
libcurl did not check the server certificate of TLS connections done to a host specified as an IP address, when built to use mbedTLS. libcurl would wrongly avoid using the set hostname function when the specified hostname was given as an IP address, therefore completely skipping the certificate check. This affects all uses of TLS protocols (HTTPS, FTPS, IMAPS, POPS3, SMTPS, etc).
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
SSA-331112 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-331112: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SINEC NMS Before V3.0 SP1
1 known affected
The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.
SINEC NMS
Summary
libcurl did not check the server certificate of TLS connections done to a host specified as an IP address, when built to use mbedTLS. libcurl would wrongly avoid using the set hostname function when the specified hostname was given as an IP address, therefore completely skipping the certificate check. This affects all uses of TLS protocols (HTTPS, FTPS, IMAPS, POPS3, SMTPS, etc).
Remediation
Update to V3.0 SP1 or later version
SSA-417159 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-417159: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SINEMA Remote Connect Client Before V3.2 SP2
1 known affected
The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.
SINEMA Remote Connect Client
Summary
libcurl did not check the server certificate of TLS connections done to a host specified as an IP address, when built to use mbedTLS. libcurl would wrongly avoid using the set hostname function when the specified hostname was given as an IP address, therefore completely skipping the certificate check. This affects all uses of TLS protocols (HTTPS, FTPS, IMAPS, POPS3, SMTPS, etc).
Remediation
Update to V3.2 SP2 or later version
Optional official sources
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2024-27415
No EUVD known-exploited evidence
ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix
Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 7 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.
Fix availability varies by product
01
What, why and how
libcurl did not check the server certificate of TLS connections done to a host specified as an IP address, when built to use mbedTLS. libcurl would wrongly avoid using the set hostname function when the specified hostname was given as an IP address, therefore completely skipping the certificate check. This affects all uses of TLS protocols (HTTPS, FTPS, IMAPS, POPS3, SMTPS, etc).
What
libcurl did not check the server certificate of TLS connections done to a host specified as an IP address, when built to use mbedTLS. libcurl would wrongly avoid using the set hostname function when the specified hostname was given as an IP address, therefore completely skipping the certificate check. This affects all uses of TLS protocols (HTTPS, FTPS, IMAPS, POPS3, SMTPS, etc).
Why
The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
What
libcurl did not check the server certificate of TLS connections done to a host specified as an IP address, when built to use mbedTLS. libcurl would wrongly avoid using the set hostname function when the specified hostname was given as an IP address, therefore completely skipping the certificate check. This affects all uses of TLS protocols (HTTPS, FTPS, IMAPS, POPS3, SMTPS, etc).
Why
The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No confirmed evidence
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Reference recorded
A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.
Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch. The product communicates with a host that provides a certificate, but the product does not properly ensure that the certificate is actually associated with that host.
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-27415Official EUVD mapping
0 linked advisory records.
Official EUVD record ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1725Apple macOS: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apple macOS ausnutzen, um seine Privilegien zu erhöhen, beliebigen Code mit Administratorrechten auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, Daten zu modifizieren, den Benutzer zu täuschen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen und vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.
Official advisory ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0726cURL: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in cURL ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, Informationen offenzulegen oder um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.
Official advisory ↗Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240403Security Bulletin 03 Apr 2024
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 03 Apr 2024, published on 3 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0563Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Splunk
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0676Multiples vulnérabilités dans Tenable Security Center
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans Tenable Security Center. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0634Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Apple
Official advisory ↗NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0339Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Microsoft Mariner
De kwetsbaarheden betreffen oudere kwetsbaarheden in diverse subcomponenten van de distro, zoals Python, Emacs, Qemu, Django, Curl, wget etc. welke in de nieuwe versie zijn verholpen.
Official advisory ↗NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0320Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Apple MacOS
Een kwaadwillende kan de kwetsbaarheden misbruiken om een beveiligingsmaatregel te omzeilen, zichzelf verhoogde rechten toe te kennen, toegang te krijgen tot gevoelige gegevens, willekeurige code uit te voeren, mogelijk met kernel-rechten of een Denial-of-Service te veroorzaken.
Voor succesvol misbruik moet de kwaadwillende het slachtoffer misleiden een malafide app te installeren en draaien, of een malafide link te volgen.
Voor het uitvoeren van willekeurige code met kernel-rechten moet de kwaadwillende reeds beschikken over verhoogde rechten op het kwetsbare systeem.
Official advisory ↗NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0433Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten
De kwetsbaarheden stellen een kwaadwillende mogelijk in staat aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade:
- Denial-of-Service (DoS)
- Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS)
- Manipulatie van gegevens
- Omzeilen van een beveiligingsmaatregel
- Omzeilen van authenticatie
- (Remote) code execution (Administrator/Root rechten)
- (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten)
- Toegang tot systeemgegevens
- Verhoogde gebruikersrechten
De kwaadwillende heeft hiervoor toegang nodig tot de productieomgeving. Het is goed gebruik een dergelijke omgeving niet publiek toegankelijk te hebben.
Official advisory ↗NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0362Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten
De kwetsbaarheden stellen een kwaadwillende mogelijk in staat aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade:
- Denial-of-Service (DoS)
- Manipulatie van gegevens
- Omzeilen van een beveiligingsmaatregel
- Omzeilen van authenticatie
- (Remote) code execution (Administrator/Root rechten)
- (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten)
- Toegang tot systeemgegevens
- Verhoogde gebruikersrechten
De kwaadwillende heeft hiervoor toegang nodig tot de productieomgeving. Het is goed gebruik een dergelijke omgeving niet publiek toegankelijk te hebben.
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
A mitigation or workaround reference is available from the source linked below; validate it against the affected product and version.
04
Evidence and provenance
Published 27 Mar 2024 · Last source change 13 Feb 2025, 17:40 UTC · CWE-297 · Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch
CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source ?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-27415
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD enriched
Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.
Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
Before
8.6.0 ≤ 8.6.0; 8.5.0 ≤ 8.5.0 · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
After
8.6.0 ≤ 8.6.0; 8.5.0 ≤ 8.5.0 · Fixed: Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.