All versions of the package jsonpath-plus are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to improper input sanitization
Unknown · jsonpath-plus
9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 72 hours
Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path and a public exploit reference; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.
Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.
1 current
CVE-2024-21534 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securityjsonpath-plus: Remote Code Execution in jsonpath-plus via Improper Input Sanitization
2 known affected
The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.
odh-dashboard-container as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
rhods/odh-dashboard-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Data Science (RHODS)
Summary
A flaw was found in jsonpath-plus. This vulnerability allows remote code execution via improper input sanitisation and unsafe default usage of the vm module in Node.js. Attackers can exploit this by executing arbitrary code through the unsafe use of the vm module in Node.js, which allows for malicious code injection. This issue occurs due to the way jsonpath-plus evaluates JSON paths using vm, a Node.js module that allows code execution. If user input is not properly sanitized, an attacker can craft JSON paths that execute dangerous commands, such as reading sensitive files.
Remediation
Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Optional official sources
National CERT insights ?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.
Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.
Official European source
ENISA European Vulnerability Database
Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.
1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier
EUVD-2024-3103
No EUVD known-exploited evidence
ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.
EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 72 hours
Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path and a public exploit reference; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
Patch available
01
What, why and how
All versions of the package jsonpath-plus are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to improper input sanitization. An attacker can execute aribitrary code on the system by exploiting the unsafe default usage of vm in Node.
**Note:**
There were several attempts to fix it in versions [10.0.0-10.1.0](https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/compare/v9.0.0...v10.1.0) but it could still be exploited using [different payloads](https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/issues/226).
What
All versions of the package jsonpath-plus are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to improper input sanitization. An attacker can execute aribitrary code on the system by exploiting the unsafe default usage of vm in Node.
**Note:**
There were several attempts to fix it in versions [10.0.0-10.1.0](https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/compare/v9.0.0...v10.1.0) but it could still be exploited using [different payloads](https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/issues/226).
Why
Untrusted data can cross into a code-evaluation path and be interpreted as executable instructions.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
What
All versions of the package jsonpath-plus are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to improper input sanitization. An attacker can execute aribitrary code on the system by exploiting the unsafe default usage of vm in Node.
**Note:**
There were several attempts to fix it in versions [10.0.0-10.1.0](https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/compare/v9.0.0...v10.1.0) but it could still be exploited using [different payloads](https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath/issues/226).
Why
Untrusted data can cross into a code-evaluation path and be interpreted as executable instructions.
How
An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.
02
Exploit reality and attack path
CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.
Observed exploitation ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.No confirmed evidence
No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.
Public PoC / exploit material ?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.Reference recorded
CISA Vulnrichment records proof-of-concept exploitation in its SSVC data. BlackTree has not independently executed or validated exploit material.
Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness ?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'). The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
CVSS vector ?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P
Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.
AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-3103Official EUVD mapping
0 linked advisory records.
Official EUVD record ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3627IBM App Connect Enterprise: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Codeausführung
Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in IBM App Connect Enterprise ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.
Official advisory ↗BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3542Red Hat OpenShift: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, beliebigen Code auszuführen und einen Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriff durchzuführen.
Official advisory ↗Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241016Security Bulletin 16 Oct 2024
The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 16 Oct 2024, published on 16 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.
Official advisory ↗CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0562Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM
Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.
Status ?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04
Evidence and provenance
Published 11 Oct 2024 · Last source change 18 Nov 2024, 10:37 UTC · CWE-94 · Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source ?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-3103
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD not scheduled
Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.
Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
Before
< * · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
After
< * · Fixed: Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata relevant to your system have been applied. For details on how to apply this update, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
Before
odh-dashboard-container as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhods/odh-dashboard-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Data Science (RHODS) · Fixed: devspaces/code-rhel8@sha256:1661e168db3b442b9de9023fb55261c1549fd034f42ab0ab0b04ad4ec7394ec0_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/code-rhel8@sha256:2a4deccbc7b8c5bc53f2fde315ccd93e7f2c2022e9288f7a93ed642feb808dc1_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/code-rhel8@sha256:7d8ade3bd7749389768efe998e8abb926e711863709366b4cb272f9139426cb3_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/dashboard-rhel8@sha256:20428bc20147f9c7f0f99aa5f2f8e711e36e82a080df2701e7c7cdd247e839ad_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/dashboard-rhel8@sha256:95302249f869bd80308548a63683bb892ca40e876561fea204169f405bb220e7_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/dashboard-rhel8@sha256:adddc36181deb1e31265d234ae6c79da78960dd153e086b0a7f7a0284243676c_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; registry.redhat.io/rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9@sha256:b6bf7ded5e146f60141840bb2e42e72125c61af0f3d3c3fbf48b35bc670675fe_amd64 as a component of Red Hat Developer Hub (RHDH) 1.6
After
odh-dashboard-container as a component of Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI); rhods/odh-dashboard-rhel8 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Data Science (RHODS) · Fixed: devspaces/code-rhel8@sha256:1661e168db3b442b9de9023fb55261c1549fd034f42ab0ab0b04ad4ec7394ec0_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/code-rhel8@sha256:2a4deccbc7b8c5bc53f2fde315ccd93e7f2c2022e9288f7a93ed642feb808dc1_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/code-rhel8@sha256:7d8ade3bd7749389768efe998e8abb926e711863709366b4cb272f9139426cb3_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/dashboard-rhel8@sha256:20428bc20147f9c7f0f99aa5f2f8e711e36e82a080df2701e7c7cdd247e839ad_ppc64le as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/dashboard-rhel8@sha256:95302249f869bd80308548a63683bb892ca40e876561fea204169f405bb220e7_amd64 as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; devspaces/dashboard-rhel8@sha256:adddc36181deb1e31265d234ae6c79da78960dd153e086b0a7f7a0284243676c_s390x as a component of Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3; registry.redhat.io/rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9@sha256:b6bf7ded5e146f60141840bb2e42e72125c61af0f3d3c3fbf48b35bc670675fe_amd64 as a component of Red Hat Developer Hub 1.6
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.