BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2023-53847High confidence

usb-storage: alauda: Fix uninit-value in alauda_check_media()

Linux · Linux

…UnscoredAssess manually
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityUnscoredOperational priority:Needs assessment, manual assessment needed.unscored

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Manual assessmentRemediation target: Manual assessment

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

13 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 9 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.52-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-nvidia-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2023-53847 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 41 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2023-53847
215 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • cluster-md-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • dlm-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • gfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • ocfs2-kmp-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb-storage: alauda: Fix uninit-value in alauda_check_media() Syzbot got KMSAN to complain about access to an uninitialized value in the alauda subdriver of usb-storage: BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in alauda_transport+0x462/0x57f0 drivers/usb/storage/alauda.c:1137 CPU: 0 PID: 12279 Comm: usb-storage Not tainted 5.3.0-rc7+ #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x191/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 kmsan_report+0x13a/0x2b0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_report.c:108 __msan_warning+0x73/0xe0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:250 alauda_check_media+0x344/0x3310 drivers/usb/storage/alauda.c:460 The problem is that alauda_check_media() doesn't verify that its USB transfer succeeded before trying to use the received data. What should happen if the transfer fails isn't entirely clear, but a reasonably conservative approach is to pretend that no media is present. A similar problem exists in a usb_stor_dbg() call in alauda_get_media_status(). In this case, when an error occurs the call is redundant, because usb_stor_ctrl_transfer() already will print a debugging message. Finally, unrelated to the uninitialized memory access, is the fact that alauda_check_media() performs DMA to a buffer on the stack. Fortunately usb-storage provides a general purpose DMA-able buffer for uses like this. We'll use it instead.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-60149

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

No CVSS base score is available from the CNA, CISA ADP or NIST. Absence of a score is not evidence of low risk; review the vendor advisory, affected exposure and exploit evidence. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb-storage: alauda: Fix uninit-value in alauda_check_media() Syzbot got KMSAN to complain about access to an uninitialized value in the alauda subdriver of usb-storage: BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in alauda_transport+0x462/0x57f0 drivers/usb/storage/alauda.c:1137 CPU: 0 PID: 12279 Comm: usb-storage Not tainted 5.3.0-rc7+ #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x191/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 kmsan_report+0x13a/0x2b0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_report.c:108 __msan_warning+0x73/0xe0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:250 alauda_check_media+0x344/0x3310 drivers/usb/storage/alauda.c:460 The problem is that alauda_check_media() doesn't verify that its USB transfer succeeded before trying to use the received data. What should happen if the transfer fails isn't entirely clear, but a reasonably conservative approach is to pretend that no media is present. A similar problem exists in a usb_stor_dbg() call in alauda_get_media_status(). In this case, when an error occurs the call is redundant, because usb_stor_ctrl_transfer() already will print a debugging message. Finally, unrelated to the uninitialized memory access, is the fact that alauda_check_media() performs DMA to a buffer on the stack. Fortunately usb-storage provides a general purpose DMA-able buffer for uses like this. We'll use it instead.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb-storage: alauda: Fix uninit-value in alauda_check_media() Syzbot got KMSAN to complain about access to an uninitialized value in the alauda subdriver of usb-storage: BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in alauda_transport+0x462/0x57f0 drivers/usb/storage/alauda.c:1137 CPU: 0 PID: 12279 Comm: usb-storage Not tainted 5.3.0-rc7+ #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x191/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 kmsan_report+0x13a/0x2b0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_report.c:108 __msan_warning+0x73/0xe0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:250 alauda_check_media+0x344/0x3310 drivers/usb/storage/alauda.c:460 The problem is that alauda_check_media() doesn't verify that its USB transfer succeeded before trying to use the received data. What should happen if the transfer fails isn't entirely clear, but a reasonably conservative approach is to pretend that no media is present. A similar problem exists in a usb_stor_dbg() call in alauda_get_media_status(). In this case, when an error occurs the call is redundant, because usb_stor_ctrl_transfer() already will print a debugging message. Finally, unrelated to the uninitialized memory access, is the fact that alauda_check_media() performs DMA to a buffer on the stack. Fortunately usb-storage provides a general purpose DMA-able buffer for uses like this. We'll use it instead.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb-storage: alauda: Fix uninit-value in alauda_check_media() Syzbot got KMSAN to complain about access to an uninitialized value in the alauda subdriver of usb-storage: BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in alauda_transport+0x462/0x57f0 drivers/usb/storage/alauda.c:1137 CPU: 0 PID: 12279 Comm: usb-storage Not tainted 5.3.0-rc7+ #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x191/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 kmsan_report+0x13a/0x2b0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_report.c:108 __msan_warning+0x73/0xe0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:250 alauda_check_media+0x344/0x3310 drivers/usb/storage/alauda.c:460 The problem is that alauda_check_media() doesn't verify that its USB transfer succeeded before trying to use the received data. What should happen if the transfer fails isn't entirely clear, but a reasonably conservative approach is to pretend that no media is present. A similar problem exists in a usb_stor_dbg() call in alauda_get_media_status(). In this case, when an error occurs the call is redundant, because usb_stor_ctrl_transfer() already will print a debugging message. Finally, unrelated to the uninitialized memory access, is the fact that alauda_check_media() performs DMA to a buffer on the stack. Fortunately usb-storage provides a general purpose DMA-able buffer for uses like this. We'll use it instead.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through the affected interface may attempt exploitation when the stated preconditions are met. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
the affected interface → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Unspecified
Privileges required
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
User interaction
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Attack complexity
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Security boundary
Not stated in the selected CVSS metric
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
Not available from the selected scoring authority.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2765Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251210Security Bulletin 10 Dec 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 10 Dec 2025, published on 10 December 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53831 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53834 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53836 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53839 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53841 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53842 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53844 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53846 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53847 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53848 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53851 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53852 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53855 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53856 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53857 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0247Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53831 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53834 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53836 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53839 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53841 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53842 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53844 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53846 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53847 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53848 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53851 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53852 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53855 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53856 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53857 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0225Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53839 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53840 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53841 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53842 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53844 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53845 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53846 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53847 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53848 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53851 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53852 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53855 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53856 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53857 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0170Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53827 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53830 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53832 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53834 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53840 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53842 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53844 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53845 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53847 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53852 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53853 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53858 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53862 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53862 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53863 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53866 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0108Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53839 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53839 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53840 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53841 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53842 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53844 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53845 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53846 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53847 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53848 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53848 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53849 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53851 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53852 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53852 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53855 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53856 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53856 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.16, 4.14.323 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.292 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.254 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.191 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.127 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.46 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.4.11 ≤ 6.4.*, 6.5 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 9 Dec 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:52 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceUnavailable
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-60149
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD not scheduled

Missing structured fields: CVSS base score, CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-60149↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-53847 · cve.blacktree.nl