BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2023-53660High confidence

bpf, cpumap: Handle skb as well when clean up ptr_ring

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

13 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 9 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.52-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-31944

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, cpumap: Handle skb as well when clean up ptr_ring The following warning was reported when running xdp_redirect_cpu with both skb-mode and stress-mode enabled: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Incorrect XDP memory type (-2128176192) usage WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1442 at net/core/xdp.c:405 Modules linked in: CPU: 7 PID: 1442 Comm: kworker/7:0 Tainted: G 6.5.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Workqueue: events __cpu_map_entry_free RIP: 0010:__xdp_return+0x1e4/0x4a0 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x65/0x70 ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ? __xdp_return+0x1e4/0x4a0 ...... xdp_return_frame+0x4d/0x150 __cpu_map_entry_free+0xf9/0x230 process_one_work+0x6b0/0xb80 worker_thread+0x96/0x720 kthread+0x1a5/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> The reason for the warning is twofold. One is due to the kthread cpu_map_kthread_run() is stopped prematurely. Another one is __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() doesn't handle skb mode and treats skbs in ptr_ring as XDP frames. Prematurely-stopped kthread will be fixed by the preceding patch and ptr_ring will be empty when __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() is called. But as the comments in __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() said, handling and freeing skbs in ptr_ring as well to "catch any broken behaviour gracefully".

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, cpumap: Handle skb as well when clean up ptr_ring The following warning was reported when running xdp_redirect_cpu with both skb-mode and stress-mode enabled: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Incorrect XDP memory type (-2128176192) usage WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1442 at net/core/xdp.c:405 Modules linked in: CPU: 7 PID: 1442 Comm: kworker/7:0 Tainted: G 6.5.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Workqueue: events __cpu_map_entry_free RIP: 0010:__xdp_return+0x1e4/0x4a0 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x65/0x70 ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ? __xdp_return+0x1e4/0x4a0 ...... xdp_return_frame+0x4d/0x150 __cpu_map_entry_free+0xf9/0x230 process_one_work+0x6b0/0xb80 worker_thread+0x96/0x720 kthread+0x1a5/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> The reason for the warning is twofold. One is due to the kthread cpu_map_kthread_run() is stopped prematurely. Another one is __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() doesn't handle skb mode and treats skbs in ptr_ring as XDP frames. Prematurely-stopped kthread will be fixed by the preceding patch and ptr_ring will be empty when __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() is called. But as the comments in __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() said, handling and freeing skbs in ptr_ring as well to "catch any broken behaviour gracefully".

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, cpumap: Handle skb as well when clean up ptr_ring The following warning was reported when running xdp_redirect_cpu with both skb-mode and stress-mode enabled: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Incorrect XDP memory type (-2128176192) usage WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1442 at net/core/xdp.c:405 Modules linked in: CPU: 7 PID: 1442 Comm: kworker/7:0 Tainted: G 6.5.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Workqueue: events __cpu_map_entry_free RIP: 0010:__xdp_return+0x1e4/0x4a0 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x65/0x70 ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ? __xdp_return+0x1e4/0x4a0 ...... xdp_return_frame+0x4d/0x150 __cpu_map_entry_free+0xf9/0x230 process_one_work+0x6b0/0xb80 worker_thread+0x96/0x720 kthread+0x1a5/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> The reason for the warning is twofold. One is due to the kthread cpu_map_kthread_run() is stopped prematurely. Another one is __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() doesn't handle skb mode and treats skbs in ptr_ring as XDP frames. Prematurely-stopped kthread will be fixed by the preceding patch and ptr_ring will be empty when __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() is called. But as the comments in __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() said, handling and freeing skbs in ptr_ring as well to "catch any broken behaviour gracefully".

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2229Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251008Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025, published on 8 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53650 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53651 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53652 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53653 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53654 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53656 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53657 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53658 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53659 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53660 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53663 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53665 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53666 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53667 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53668 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53649 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53650 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53652 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53653 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53654 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53656 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53657 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53658 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53659 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53660 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53663 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53665 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53666 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53667 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53668 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53650 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53651 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53651 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53652 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53653 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53654 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53656 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53657 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53658 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53659 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53660 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53663 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53665 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53666 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53667 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53668 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53649 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53650 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53652 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53652 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53653 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53654 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53654 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53656 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53657 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53658 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53659 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53659 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53660 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53663 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53665 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53665 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53666 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53666 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53668 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53668 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53672 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025753LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける不特定の脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。bpfとcpumapにおいて、ptr_ringのクリーンアップ時にskbも適切に処理するようになりました。skbモードとストレスモードの両方を有効にしてxdp_redirect_cpuを実行した際に、以下の警告が報告されました。---------[ cut here ]------------不正なXDPメモリタイプ(-2128176192)の使用 警告:CPU: 7 PID: 1442 at net/core/xdp.c:405 モジュール:なし CPU: 7 PID: 1442 実行中のプロセスはkworker/7:0であり、システムはTainted: G 6.5.0-rc2+ #1の状態です。ハードウェア名はQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)で、ワークキューはeventsです。__cpu_map_entry_free関数が呼ばれ、RIPは0010:__xdp_return+0x1e4/0x4a0にあります。呼び出しトレースは以下の通りです:TASK ? show_regs+0x65/0x70 ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ? __xdp_return+0x1e4/0x4a0 …… xdp_return_frame+0x4d/0x150 __cpu_map_entry_free+0xf9/0x230 process_one_work+0x6b0/0xb80 worker_thread+0x96/0x720 kthread+0x1a5/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 /TASK 警告の原因は2点あります。1つ目はkthreadのcpu_map_kthread_run()が早期に停止してしまうこと、2つ目は__cpu_map_ring_cleanup()がskbモードを処理せず、ptr_ring内のskbをXDPフレームとして誤って扱っていたことです。早期に停止したkthreadは先行するパッチで修正され、__cpu_map_ring_cleanup()が呼ばれる際にはptr_ringは空の状態になります。しかし、__cpu_map_ring_cleanup()のコメントにもある通り、ptr_ring内のskbも適切に処理および解放し、「不具合があっても優雅に処理する」必要があります。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 11941f8a85362f612df61f4aaab0e41b64d2111d < b58d34068fd9f96bfc7d389988dfaf9a92a8fe00, 11941f8a85362f612df61f4aaab0e41b64d2111d < cbd000451885801e9bbfd9cf7a7946806a85cb5e, 11941f8a85362f612df61f4aaab0e41b64d2111d < 937345720d18f1ad006ba3d5dcb3fa121037b8a2, 11941f8a85362f612df61f4aaab0e41b64d2111d < 7c62b75cd1a792e14b037fa4f61f9b18914e7de1, 5.15
Fixed
Linux: < 5.15, 5.15.126 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.45 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.4.10 ≤ 6.4.*, 6.5 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 7 Oct 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-31944
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-53660 · cve.blacktree.nl