BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2023-53622High confidence

gfs2: Fix possible data races in gfs2_show_options()

Linux · Linux

7.0HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

13 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 9 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.52-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.13-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2023-53622 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 52 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2023-53622
211 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: Fix possible data races in gfs2_show_options() Some fields such as gt_logd_secs of the struct gfs2_tune are accessed without holding the lock gt_spin in gfs2_show_options(): val = sdp->sd_tune.gt_logd_secs; if (val != 30) seq_printf(s, ",commit=%d", val); And thus can cause data races when gfs2_show_options() and other functions such as gfs2_reconfigure() are concurrently executed: spin_lock(&gt->gt_spin); gt->gt_logd_secs = newargs->ar_commit; To fix these possible data races, the lock sdp->sd_tune.gt_spin is acquired before accessing the fields of gfs2_tune and released after these accesses. Further changes by Andreas: - Don't hold the spin lock over the seq_printf operations.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-32008

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: Fix possible data races in gfs2_show_options() Some fields such as gt_logd_secs of the struct gfs2_tune are accessed without holding the lock gt_spin in gfs2_show_options(): val = sdp->sd_tune.gt_logd_secs; if (val != 30) seq_printf(s, ",commit=%d", val); And thus can cause data races when gfs2_show_options() and other functions such as gfs2_reconfigure() are concurrently executed: spin_lock(&gt->gt_spin); gt->gt_logd_secs = newargs->ar_commit; To fix these possible data races, the lock sdp->sd_tune.gt_spin is acquired before accessing the fields of gfs2_tune and released after these accesses. Further changes by Andreas: - Don't hold the spin lock over the seq_printf operations.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: Fix possible data races in gfs2_show_options() Some fields such as gt_logd_secs of the struct gfs2_tune are accessed without holding the lock gt_spin in gfs2_show_options(): val = sdp->sd_tune.gt_logd_secs; if (val != 30) seq_printf(s, ",commit=%d", val); And thus can cause data races when gfs2_show_options() and other functions such as gfs2_reconfigure() are concurrently executed: spin_lock(&gt->gt_spin); gt->gt_logd_secs = newargs->ar_commit; To fix these possible data races, the lock sdp->sd_tune.gt_spin is acquired before accessing the fields of gfs2_tune and released after these accesses. Further changes by Andreas: - Don't hold the spin lock over the seq_printf operations.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: Fix possible data races in gfs2_show_options() Some fields such as gt_logd_secs of the struct gfs2_tune are accessed without holding the lock gt_spin in gfs2_show_options(): val = sdp->sd_tune.gt_logd_secs; if (val != 30) seq_printf(s, ",commit=%d", val); And thus can cause data races when gfs2_show_options() and other functions such as gfs2_reconfigure() are concurrently executed: spin_lock(&gt->gt_spin); gt->gt_logd_secs = newargs->ar_commit; To fix these possible data races, the lock sdp->sd_tune.gt_spin is acquired before accessing the fields of gfs2_tune and released after these accesses. Further changes by Andreas: - Don't hold the spin lock over the seq_printf operations.

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0349Dell Avamar und NetWorker: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Avamar und Dell NetWorker ausnutzen, um Angriffe zu starten, die die Integrität, Vertraulichkeit und Verfügbarkeit von Systemen beeinträchtigen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2229Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251008Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025, published on 8 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53611 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53612 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53613 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53615 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53616 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53617 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53618 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53619 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53621 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53622 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53625 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53626 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53631 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53632 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53633 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53637 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53638 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53611 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53613 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53615 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53616 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53617 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53618 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53619 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53620 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53620 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53621 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53622 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53624 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53631 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53632 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53633 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53635 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53638 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53644 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53611 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53612 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53613 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53615 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53616 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53617 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53618 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53619 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53621 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53622 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53625 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53626 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53631 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53632 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53633 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53637 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53638 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53603 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53611 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53611 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53613 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53613 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53615 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53616 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53616 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53617 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53617 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53618 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53618 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53619 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53621 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53622 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53631 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53632 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53633 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53638 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53645 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53645 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53646 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53647 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53647 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53648 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025937LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。gfs2: gfs2_show_options()における可能性のあるデータ競合を修正しました。gfs2_show_options()内でstruct gfs2_tuneのフィールドであるgt_logd_secsなどが、gt_spinロックを保持せずにアクセスされていました。そのため、gfs2_show_options()とgfs2_reconfigure()などの他の関数が同時に実行される場合にデータ競合が発生していました。これを修正するために、gfs2_tuneのフィールドにアクセスする前にsdp-sd_tune.gt_spinロックを取得し、アクセス後に解放するようにしました。さらに、Andreasによる変更として、seq_printf操作中はスピンロックを保持しないようにしています。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.31, 4.14.324 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.293 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.255 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.192 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.128 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.47 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.4.12 ≤ 6.4.*, 6.5 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 7 Oct 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:48 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32008
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32008↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-53622 · cve.blacktree.nl