BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2023-53577High confidence

bpf, cpumap: Make sure kthread is running before map update returns

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.15% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

13 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 9 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.52-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.4.11-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-32313

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, cpumap: Make sure kthread is running before map update returns The following warning was reported when running stress-mode enabled xdp_redirect_cpu with some RT threads: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 65 at kernel/bpf/cpumap.c:135 CPU: 4 PID: 65 Comm: kworker/4:1 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Workqueue: events cpu_map_kthread_stop RIP: 0010:put_cpu_map_entry+0xda/0x220 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x65/0x70 ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ...... ? put_cpu_map_entry+0xda/0x220 cpu_map_kthread_stop+0x41/0x60 process_one_work+0x6b0/0xb80 worker_thread+0x96/0x720 kthread+0x1a5/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> The root cause is the same as commit 436901649731 ("bpf: cpumap: Fix memory leak in cpu_map_update_elem"). The kthread is stopped prematurely by kthread_stop() in cpu_map_kthread_stop(), and kthread() doesn't call cpu_map_kthread_run() at all but XDP program has already queued some frames or skbs into ptr_ring. So when __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() checks the ptr_ring, it will find it was not emptied and report a warning. An alternative fix is to use __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() to drop these pending frames or skbs when kthread_stop() returns -EINTR, but it may confuse the user, because these frames or skbs have been handled correctly by XDP program. So instead of dropping these frames or skbs, just make sure the per-cpu kthread is running before __cpu_map_entry_alloc() returns. After apply the fix, the error handle for kthread_stop() will be unnecessary because it will always return 0, so just remove it.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, cpumap: Make sure kthread is running before map update returns The following warning was reported when running stress-mode enabled xdp_redirect_cpu with some RT threads: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 65 at kernel/bpf/cpumap.c:135 CPU: 4 PID: 65 Comm: kworker/4:1 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Workqueue: events cpu_map_kthread_stop RIP: 0010:put_cpu_map_entry+0xda/0x220 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x65/0x70 ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ...... ? put_cpu_map_entry+0xda/0x220 cpu_map_kthread_stop+0x41/0x60 process_one_work+0x6b0/0xb80 worker_thread+0x96/0x720 kthread+0x1a5/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> The root cause is the same as commit 436901649731 ("bpf: cpumap: Fix memory leak in cpu_map_update_elem"). The kthread is stopped prematurely by kthread_stop() in cpu_map_kthread_stop(), and kthread() doesn't call cpu_map_kthread_run() at all but XDP program has already queued some frames or skbs into ptr_ring. So when __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() checks the ptr_ring, it will find it was not emptied and report a warning. An alternative fix is to use __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() to drop these pending frames or skbs when kthread_stop() returns -EINTR, but it may confuse the user, because these frames or skbs have been handled correctly by XDP program. So instead of dropping these frames or skbs, just make sure the per-cpu kthread is running before __cpu_map_entry_alloc() returns. After apply the fix, the error handle for kthread_stop() will be unnecessary because it will always return 0, so just remove it.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, cpumap: Make sure kthread is running before map update returns The following warning was reported when running stress-mode enabled xdp_redirect_cpu with some RT threads: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 65 at kernel/bpf/cpumap.c:135 CPU: 4 PID: 65 Comm: kworker/4:1 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Workqueue: events cpu_map_kthread_stop RIP: 0010:put_cpu_map_entry+0xda/0x220 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x65/0x70 ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ...... ? put_cpu_map_entry+0xda/0x220 cpu_map_kthread_stop+0x41/0x60 process_one_work+0x6b0/0xb80 worker_thread+0x96/0x720 kthread+0x1a5/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> The root cause is the same as commit 436901649731 ("bpf: cpumap: Fix memory leak in cpu_map_update_elem"). The kthread is stopped prematurely by kthread_stop() in cpu_map_kthread_stop(), and kthread() doesn't call cpu_map_kthread_run() at all but XDP program has already queued some frames or skbs into ptr_ring. So when __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() checks the ptr_ring, it will find it was not emptied and report a warning. An alternative fix is to use __cpu_map_ring_cleanup() to drop these pending frames or skbs when kthread_stop() returns -EINTR, but it may confuse the user, because these frames or skbs have been handled correctly by XDP program. So instead of dropping these frames or skbs, just make sure the per-cpu kthread is running before __cpu_map_entry_alloc() returns. After apply the fix, the error handle for kthread_stop() will be unnecessary because it will always return 0, so just remove it.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2194Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251008Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025, published on 8 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53564 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53566 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53567 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53568 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53570 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53571 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53575 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53577 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53578 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53579 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53580 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53581 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53582 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53583 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53585 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1047Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53560 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53563 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53564 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53566 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53568 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53570 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53575 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53577 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53579 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53580 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53581 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53582 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53583 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53585 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53587 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53566 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53567 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53568 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53570 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53571 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53571 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53575 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53576 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53577 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53578 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53579 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53580 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53581 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53582 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53583 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53585 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53558 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53559 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53560 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53563 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53568 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53570 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53575 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53577 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53577 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53579 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53580 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53581 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53583 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53585 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53588 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53593 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-026017LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。bpfのcpumapに関して、mapの更新が返る前にkthreadが実行中であることを確認します。stressモードを有効にした状態でxdp_redirect_cpuを一部のRTスレッドで実行すると、以下の警告が報告されました。------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 65 at kernel/bpf/cpumap.c:135 CPU: 4 PID: 65 Comm: kworker/4:1 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Workqueue: events cpu_map_kthread_stop RIP: 0010:put_cpu_map_entry+0xda/0x220 ...... Call Trace: TASK ? show_regs+0x65/0x70 ? __warn+0xa5/0x240 ...... ? put_cpu_map_entry+0xda/0x220 cpu_map_kthread_stop+0x41/0x60 process_one_work+0x6b0/0xb80 worker_thread+0x96/0x720 kthread+0x1a5/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 /TASK 根本原因はコミット436901649731("bpf: cpumap: Fix memory leak in cpu_map_update_elem")と同じです。kthreadはcpu_map_kthread_stop()内のkthread_stop()によって早期に停止され、kthread()はcpu_map_kthread_run()を全く呼び出しませんでしたが、XDPプログラムはすでにいくつかのフレームまたはskbをptr_ringにキューイングしていました。したがって、__cpu_map_ring_cleanup()がptr_ringをチェックしたところ空ではないことが判明し、警告を報告しました。代替の修正方法として、kthread_stop()が-EINTRを返したときにこれらの保留中のフレームやskbを__cpu_map_ring_cleanup()で破棄する方法もありますが、これらのフレームやskbはXDPプログラムによって正しく処理されているため、ユーザーが混乱する可能性があります。したがって、これらのフレームやskbを破棄せずに、__cpu_map_entry_alloc()が返る前に各CPUのkthreadが実行されていることを保証します。修正を適用した後は、kthread_stop()のエラーハンドリングは不要です。なぜなら常に0を返すため、単に削除すればよいためです。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 6710e1126934d8b4372b4d2f9ae1646cd3f151bf < b44d28b98f185d2f2348aa3c3636838c316f889e, 6710e1126934d8b4372b4d2f9ae1646cd3f151bf < 7a1178a3671b40746830d355836b72e47ceb2490, 6710e1126934d8b4372b4d2f9ae1646cd3f151bf < ecb45b852af5e88257020b88bea5ff0798d72aca, 6710e1126934d8b4372b4d2f9ae1646cd3f151bf < 640a604585aa30f93e39b17d4d6ba69fcb1e66c9, 4.15
Fixed
Linux: < 4.15, 5.15.126 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.45 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.4.10 ≤ 6.4.*, 6.5 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 4 Oct 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32313
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-53577 · cve.blacktree.nl