BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2023-53513High confidence

nbd: fix incomplete validation of ioctl arg

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.14% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

13 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 9 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.3.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.37-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.3.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.3.7-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-32743

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nbd: fix incomplete validation of ioctl arg We tested and found an alarm caused by nbd_ioctl arg without verification. The UBSAN warning calltrace like below: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/buffer.c:1709:35 signed integer overflow: -9223372036854775808 - 1 cannot be represented in type 'long long int' CPU: 3 PID: 2523 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.90 #1 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3f0 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:78 show_stack+0x28/0x38 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:158 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x170/0x1dc lib/dump_stack.c:118 ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0xb4 lib/ubsan.c:161 handle_overflow+0x188/0x1dc lib/ubsan.c:192 __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow+0x34/0x44 lib/ubsan.c:206 __block_write_full_page+0x94c/0xa20 fs/buffer.c:1709 block_write_full_page+0x1f0/0x280 fs/buffer.c:2934 blkdev_writepage+0x34/0x40 fs/block_dev.c:607 __writepage+0x68/0xe8 mm/page-writeback.c:2305 write_cache_pages+0x44c/0xc70 mm/page-writeback.c:2240 generic_writepages+0xdc/0x148 mm/page-writeback.c:2329 blkdev_writepages+0x2c/0x38 fs/block_dev.c:2114 do_writepages+0xd4/0x250 mm/page-writeback.c:2344 The reason for triggering this warning is __block_write_full_page() -> i_size_read(inode) - 1 overflow. inode->i_size is assigned in __nbd_ioctl() -> nbd_set_size() -> bytesize. We think it is necessary to limit the size of arg to prevent errors. Moreover, __nbd_ioctl() -> nbd_add_socket(), arg will be cast to int. Assuming the value of arg is 0x80000000000000001) (on a 64-bit machine), it will become 1 after the coercion, which will return unexpected results. Fix it by adding checks to prevent passing in too large numbers.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nbd: fix incomplete validation of ioctl arg We tested and found an alarm caused by nbd_ioctl arg without verification. The UBSAN warning calltrace like below: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/buffer.c:1709:35 signed integer overflow: -9223372036854775808 - 1 cannot be represented in type 'long long int' CPU: 3 PID: 2523 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.90 #1 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3f0 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:78 show_stack+0x28/0x38 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:158 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x170/0x1dc lib/dump_stack.c:118 ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0xb4 lib/ubsan.c:161 handle_overflow+0x188/0x1dc lib/ubsan.c:192 __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow+0x34/0x44 lib/ubsan.c:206 __block_write_full_page+0x94c/0xa20 fs/buffer.c:1709 block_write_full_page+0x1f0/0x280 fs/buffer.c:2934 blkdev_writepage+0x34/0x40 fs/block_dev.c:607 __writepage+0x68/0xe8 mm/page-writeback.c:2305 write_cache_pages+0x44c/0xc70 mm/page-writeback.c:2240 generic_writepages+0xdc/0x148 mm/page-writeback.c:2329 blkdev_writepages+0x2c/0x38 fs/block_dev.c:2114 do_writepages+0xd4/0x250 mm/page-writeback.c:2344 The reason for triggering this warning is __block_write_full_page() -> i_size_read(inode) - 1 overflow. inode->i_size is assigned in __nbd_ioctl() -> nbd_set_size() -> bytesize. We think it is necessary to limit the size of arg to prevent errors. Moreover, __nbd_ioctl() -> nbd_add_socket(), arg will be cast to int. Assuming the value of arg is 0x80000000000000001) (on a 64-bit machine), it will become 1 after the coercion, which will return unexpected results. Fix it by adding checks to prevent passing in too large numbers.

Why

The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nbd: fix incomplete validation of ioctl arg We tested and found an alarm caused by nbd_ioctl arg without verification. The UBSAN warning calltrace like below: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/buffer.c:1709:35 signed integer overflow: -9223372036854775808 - 1 cannot be represented in type 'long long int' CPU: 3 PID: 2523 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.90 #1 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3f0 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:78 show_stack+0x28/0x38 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:158 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x170/0x1dc lib/dump_stack.c:118 ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0xb4 lib/ubsan.c:161 handle_overflow+0x188/0x1dc lib/ubsan.c:192 __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow+0x34/0x44 lib/ubsan.c:206 __block_write_full_page+0x94c/0xa20 fs/buffer.c:1709 block_write_full_page+0x1f0/0x280 fs/buffer.c:2934 blkdev_writepage+0x34/0x40 fs/block_dev.c:607 __writepage+0x68/0xe8 mm/page-writeback.c:2305 write_cache_pages+0x44c/0xc70 mm/page-writeback.c:2240 generic_writepages+0xdc/0x148 mm/page-writeback.c:2329 blkdev_writepages+0x2c/0x38 fs/block_dev.c:2114 do_writepages+0xd4/0x250 mm/page-writeback.c:2344 The reason for triggering this warning is __block_write_full_page() -> i_size_read(inode) - 1 overflow. inode->i_size is assigned in __nbd_ioctl() -> nbd_set_size() -> bytesize. We think it is necessary to limit the size of arg to prevent errors. Moreover, __nbd_ioctl() -> nbd_add_socket(), arg will be cast to int. Assuming the value of arg is 0x80000000000000001) (on a 64-bit machine), it will become 1 after the coercion, which will return unexpected results. Fix it by adding checks to prevent passing in too large numbers.

Why

The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Uncontrolled Recursion → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-674 ↗

CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion. The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-674
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2187Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht nähere beschriebene Effekte zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251008Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025, published on 8 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0226Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

3358 du 25 février 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3358 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:3360 du 25 février 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3360 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:3375 du 25 février 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3375 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:3388 du 26 février 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3388 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50673 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50865 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53192 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53539 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53581 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53673 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53762 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53821 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53827 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53833 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53833 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37861 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0056Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

at.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0537 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:0576 du 14 janvier 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0576 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:0643 du 15 janvier 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0643 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50447 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50543 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52638 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53322 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53401 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53539 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53581 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53675 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53680 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53705 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23142 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23142 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38051 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1132Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2023-53226 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53297 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53305 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53322 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53354 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53365 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53373 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53393 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53401 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53680 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53680 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38499 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38499 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38724 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1131Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

VERecord?id=CVE-2022-3510 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3697 Référence CVE CVE-2022-45061 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45061 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50543 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1370 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2976 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34055 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39804 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53401 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53539 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53539 Référence CVE CVE-2024-12797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797 Référence CVE CVE-2024-22354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22354 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23454 Référence CVE CVE-2024-25710 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25710 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26308 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34155 Référence CVE CVE-2024-34156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1074Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2022-50410 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53185 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53213 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53213 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53305 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53354 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53373 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53386 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53513 Référence CVE CVE-2024-58240 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58240 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37797 Référence CVE CVE-2025-37914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37914 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38200 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38200 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38211 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1049Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

d?id=CVE-2023-52610 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53232 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53232 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53257 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53297 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53322 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53354 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53354 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53365 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53386 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53393 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53513 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38718 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38729 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39697 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39702 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39730 Référence CVE CVE-2025-39757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53501 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53504 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53505 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53505 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53506 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53508 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53509 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53510 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53512 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53515 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53516 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53518 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53519 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53521 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53523 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025448LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける再帰制御に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました:nbdのioctl引数の不完全な検証を修正しました。我々は検証されていないnbd_ioctl引数によるアラームをテストで確認しました。UBSANの警告コールトレースは以下の通りです:UBSAN: fs/buffer.c:1709:35で未定義動作が発生しました。符号付き整数オーバーフロー:-9223372036854775808 - 1は'long long int'型で表現できません。CPUは3で、PIDは2523、実行中のプロセスはsyz-executor.0です。汚染はありません。カーネルバージョンは4.19.90 #1で、ハードウェア名はlinux,dummy-virt (DT)です。コールトレースの詳細は省略します。警告が発生する理由は、__block_write_full_page()内でのi_size_read(inode) - 1のオーバーフローにあります。inode-i_sizeは__nbd_ioctl()からnbd_set_size()を経てbytesizeに割り当てられています。誤動作を防ぐために引数のサイズ制限が必要だと考えられます。さらに、__nbd_ioctl()からnbd_add_socket()内で引数がint型にキャストされるため、64ビットマシン上で0x8000000000000001のような値を想定すると、キャスト後は1となり、予期しない結果を返します。大きすぎる数値が渡されることを防ぐチェックを追加して修正しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: b9c495bb6d8edc719fd23af2ac67de8303cfc1e8 < 52851d0c3354b397c11d31dfeb8b2a2fc85a0002, b9c495bb6d8edc719fd23af2ac67de8303cfc1e8 < fab766c8a1aff715bce7075aab40e780266f8e1a, b9c495bb6d8edc719fd23af2ac67de8303cfc1e8 < ffb75ffaa68723276365d0f9d00b03362b750657, b9c495bb6d8edc719fd23af2ac67de8303cfc1e8 < 55793ea54d77719a071b1ccc05a05056e3b5e009, 4.1
Fixed
Linux: < 4.1, 5.15.113 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.30 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.3.4 ≤ 6.3.*, 6.4 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Oct 2025 · Last source change 11 Jun 2026, 18:44 UTC · CWE-674 · Uncontrolled Recursion

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32743
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-53513 · cve.blacktree.nl