BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2023-53471High confidence

drm/amdgpu/gfx: disable gfx9 cp_ecc_error_irq only when enabling legacy gfx ras

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

9 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-32778

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu/gfx: disable gfx9 cp_ecc_error_irq only when enabling legacy gfx ras gfx9 cp_ecc_error_irq is only enabled when legacy gfx ras is assert. So in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini, interrupt disablement for cp_ecc_error_irq should be executed under such condition, otherwise, an amdgpu_irq_put calltrace will occur. [ 7283.170322] RIP: 0010:amdgpu_irq_put+0x45/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 7283.170964] RSP: 0018:ffff9a5fc3967d00 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 7283.170967] RAX: ffff98d88afd3040 RBX: ffff98d89da20000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 7283.170969] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff98d89da2bef8 RDI: ffff98d89da20000 [ 7283.170971] RBP: ffff98d89da20000 R08: ffff98d89da2ca18 R09: 0000000000000006 [ 7283.170973] R10: ffffd5764243c008 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000001050 [ 7283.170975] R13: ffff98d89da38978 R14: ffffffff999ae15a R15: ffff98d880130105 [ 7283.170978] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98d996f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 7283.170981] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 7283.170983] CR2: 00000000f7a9d178 CR3: 00000001c42ea000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 [ 7283.170986] Call Trace: [ 7283.170988] <TASK> [ 7283.170989] gfx_v9_0_hw_fini+0x1c/0x6d0 [amdgpu] [ 7283.171655] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2+0x101/0x1a0 [amdgpu] [ 7283.172245] amdgpu_device_suspend+0x103/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 7283.172823] amdgpu_pmops_freeze+0x21/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 7283.173412] pci_pm_freeze+0x54/0xc0 [ 7283.173419] ? __pfx_pci_pm_freeze+0x10/0x10 [ 7283.173425] dpm_run_callback+0x98/0x200 [ 7283.173430] __device_suspend+0x164/0x5f0 v2: drop gfx11 as it's fixed in a different solution by retiring cp_ecc_irq funcs(Hawking)

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu/gfx: disable gfx9 cp_ecc_error_irq only when enabling legacy gfx ras gfx9 cp_ecc_error_irq is only enabled when legacy gfx ras is assert. So in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini, interrupt disablement for cp_ecc_error_irq should be executed under such condition, otherwise, an amdgpu_irq_put calltrace will occur. [ 7283.170322] RIP: 0010:amdgpu_irq_put+0x45/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 7283.170964] RSP: 0018:ffff9a5fc3967d00 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 7283.170967] RAX: ffff98d88afd3040 RBX: ffff98d89da20000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 7283.170969] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff98d89da2bef8 RDI: ffff98d89da20000 [ 7283.170971] RBP: ffff98d89da20000 R08: ffff98d89da2ca18 R09: 0000000000000006 [ 7283.170973] R10: ffffd5764243c008 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000001050 [ 7283.170975] R13: ffff98d89da38978 R14: ffffffff999ae15a R15: ffff98d880130105 [ 7283.170978] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98d996f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 7283.170981] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 7283.170983] CR2: 00000000f7a9d178 CR3: 00000001c42ea000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 [ 7283.170986] Call Trace: [ 7283.170988] <TASK> [ 7283.170989] gfx_v9_0_hw_fini+0x1c/0x6d0 [amdgpu] [ 7283.171655] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2+0x101/0x1a0 [amdgpu] [ 7283.172245] amdgpu_device_suspend+0x103/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 7283.172823] amdgpu_pmops_freeze+0x21/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 7283.173412] pci_pm_freeze+0x54/0xc0 [ 7283.173419] ? __pfx_pci_pm_freeze+0x10/0x10 [ 7283.173425] dpm_run_callback+0x98/0x200 [ 7283.173430] __device_suspend+0x164/0x5f0 v2: drop gfx11 as it's fixed in a different solution by retiring cp_ecc_irq funcs(Hawking)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu/gfx: disable gfx9 cp_ecc_error_irq only when enabling legacy gfx ras gfx9 cp_ecc_error_irq is only enabled when legacy gfx ras is assert. So in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini, interrupt disablement for cp_ecc_error_irq should be executed under such condition, otherwise, an amdgpu_irq_put calltrace will occur. [ 7283.170322] RIP: 0010:amdgpu_irq_put+0x45/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 7283.170964] RSP: 0018:ffff9a5fc3967d00 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 7283.170967] RAX: ffff98d88afd3040 RBX: ffff98d89da20000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 7283.170969] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff98d89da2bef8 RDI: ffff98d89da20000 [ 7283.170971] RBP: ffff98d89da20000 R08: ffff98d89da2ca18 R09: 0000000000000006 [ 7283.170973] R10: ffffd5764243c008 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000001050 [ 7283.170975] R13: ffff98d89da38978 R14: ffffffff999ae15a R15: ffff98d880130105 [ 7283.170978] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98d996f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 7283.170981] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 7283.170983] CR2: 00000000f7a9d178 CR3: 00000001c42ea000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 [ 7283.170986] Call Trace: [ 7283.170988] <TASK> [ 7283.170989] gfx_v9_0_hw_fini+0x1c/0x6d0 [amdgpu] [ 7283.171655] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase2+0x101/0x1a0 [amdgpu] [ 7283.172245] amdgpu_device_suspend+0x103/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 7283.172823] amdgpu_pmops_freeze+0x21/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 7283.173412] pci_pm_freeze+0x54/0xc0 [ 7283.173419] ? __pfx_pci_pm_freeze+0x10/0x10 [ 7283.173425] dpm_run_callback+0x98/0x200 [ 7283.173430] __device_suspend+0x164/0x5f0 v2: drop gfx11 as it's fixed in a different solution by retiring cp_ecc_irq funcs(Hawking)

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2187Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht nähere beschriebene Effekte zu verursachen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53456 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53457 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53457 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53458 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53461 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53462 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53463 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53464 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53465 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53468 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53471 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53472 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53473 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53474 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53475 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53476 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53479 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53480 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53485 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53457 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53458 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53461 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53461 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53462 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53463 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53463 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53464 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53465 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53466 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53468 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53471 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53471 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53472 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53473 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53474 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53474 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53475 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53476 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53479 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53480 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53480 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53482 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 < 625d4112ea25dbad7ddf749fd5c1287ceffb2339, d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 < 20ca90ceda71ed90a4d6960acbe7d5e120b40c0d, d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 < cd3c0f7013c37cd24fc40b601319007f136c1201, d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 < f661ad53658a1ea35c004af1f5fbe25c4d1cdb08, d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 < 3d28af21a874c5123d1681c2d686627f7ff7e488, d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 < efce310db74fdc6d2acd959f3582972ae4a8d7d5, d38ceaf99ed015f2a0b9af3499791bd3a3daae21 < 4a76680311330aefe5074bed8f06afa354b85c48, 4.2
Fixed
Linux: < 4.2, 5.4.243 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.180 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.112 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.29 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.2.16 ≤ 6.2.*, 6.3.3 ≤ 6.3.*, 6.4 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Oct 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:45 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32778
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32778↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-53471 · cve.blacktree.nl