BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2023-53097High confidence

powerpc/iommu: fix memory leak with using debugfs_lookup()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

6 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.20-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-13169

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/iommu: fix memory leak with using debugfs_lookup() When calling debugfs_lookup() the result must have dput() called on it, otherwise the memory will leak over time. To make things simpler, just call debugfs_lookup_and_remove() instead which handles all of the logic at once.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/iommu: fix memory leak with using debugfs_lookup() When calling debugfs_lookup() the result must have dput() called on it, otherwise the memory will leak over time. To make things simpler, just call debugfs_lookup_and_remove() instead which handles all of the logic at once.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/iommu: fix memory leak with using debugfs_lookup() When calling debugfs_lookup() the result must have dput() called on it, otherwise the memory will leak over time. To make things simpler, just call debugfs_lookup_and_remove() instead which handles all of the logic at once.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250507Security Bulletin 07 May 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 May 2025, published on 7 May 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53098 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53099 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53100 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53101 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53106 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53108 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53111 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53095 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53098 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53099 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53100 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53101 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53102 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53105 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53105 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53106 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2022-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50229 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50231 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3111 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35840 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36978 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53020 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53046 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53133 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53145 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53146 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53146 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26586 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26762 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26825 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53098 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53099 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53100 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53101 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53106 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53106 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53108 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53111 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53114 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-029997Linux の Linux Kernel における有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 691602aab9c3cce31d3ff9529c09b7922a5f6224 < e3a62a35f903fd8be5b44542fe3901ec45f16757, 691602aab9c3cce31d3ff9529c09b7922a5f6224 < 24c1bd1cd0d1ff821fd7d2f01a1e648c7882dfc2, 691602aab9c3cce31d3ff9529c09b7922a5f6224 < 4050498c0ae3946c223fc63e9dd7b878b76611e0, 691602aab9c3cce31d3ff9529c09b7922a5f6224 < b505063910c134778202dfad9332dfcecb76bab3, 5.12
Fixed
Linux: < 5.12, 5.15.103 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.20 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.2.7 ≤ 6.2.*, 6.3 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 May 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:38 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-13169
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-53097 · cve.blacktree.nl