BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2023-53089High confidence

ext4: fix task hung in ext4_xattr_delete_inode

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

6 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.25-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-13160

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix task hung in ext4_xattr_delete_inode Syzbot reported a hung task problem: ================================================================== INFO: task syz-executor232:5073 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc2-syzkaller-00024-g512dee0c00ad #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-exec232 state:D stack:21024 pid:5073 ppid:5072 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5244 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6555 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6631 __wait_on_freeing_inode fs/inode.c:2196 [inline] find_inode_fast+0x35a/0x4c0 fs/inode.c:950 iget_locked+0xb1/0x830 fs/inode.c:1273 __ext4_iget+0x22e/0x3ed0 fs/ext4/inode.c:4861 ext4_xattr_inode_iget+0x68/0x4e0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:389 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x1a7/0xe50 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1148 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xb04/0xcd0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2880 ext4_evict_inode+0xd7c/0x10b0 fs/ext4/inode.c:296 evict+0x2a4/0x620 fs/inode.c:664 ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474 __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5516 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x81cd/0x8700 fs/ext4/super.c:5644 get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1282 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1489 do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3145 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3674 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7fa5406fd5ea RSP: 002b:00007ffc7232f968 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fa5406fd5ea RDX: 0000000020000440 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 00007ffc7232f970 RBP: 00007ffc7232f970 R08: 00007ffc7232f9b0 R09: 0000000000000432 R10: 0000000000804a03 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 0000555556a7a2c0 R14: 00007ffc7232f9b0 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> ================================================================== The problem is that the inode contains an xattr entry with ea_inum of 15 when cleaning up an orphan inode <15>. When evict inode <15>, the reference counting of the corresponding EA inode is decreased. When EA inode <15> is found by find_inode_fast() in __ext4_iget(), it is found that the EA inode holds the I_FREEING flag and waits for the EA inode to complete deletion. As a result, when inode <15> is being deleted, we wait for inode <15> to complete the deletion, resulting in an infinite loop and triggering Hung Task. To solve this problem, we only need to check whether the ino of EA inode and parent is the same before getting EA inode.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix task hung in ext4_xattr_delete_inode Syzbot reported a hung task problem: ================================================================== INFO: task syz-executor232:5073 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc2-syzkaller-00024-g512dee0c00ad #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-exec232 state:D stack:21024 pid:5073 ppid:5072 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5244 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6555 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6631 __wait_on_freeing_inode fs/inode.c:2196 [inline] find_inode_fast+0x35a/0x4c0 fs/inode.c:950 iget_locked+0xb1/0x830 fs/inode.c:1273 __ext4_iget+0x22e/0x3ed0 fs/ext4/inode.c:4861 ext4_xattr_inode_iget+0x68/0x4e0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:389 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x1a7/0xe50 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1148 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xb04/0xcd0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2880 ext4_evict_inode+0xd7c/0x10b0 fs/ext4/inode.c:296 evict+0x2a4/0x620 fs/inode.c:664 ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474 __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5516 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x81cd/0x8700 fs/ext4/super.c:5644 get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1282 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1489 do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3145 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3674 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7fa5406fd5ea RSP: 002b:00007ffc7232f968 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fa5406fd5ea RDX: 0000000020000440 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 00007ffc7232f970 RBP: 00007ffc7232f970 R08: 00007ffc7232f9b0 R09: 0000000000000432 R10: 0000000000804a03 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 0000555556a7a2c0 R14: 00007ffc7232f9b0 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> ================================================================== The problem is that the inode contains an xattr entry with ea_inum of 15 when cleaning up an orphan inode <15>. When evict inode <15>, the reference counting of the corresponding EA inode is decreased. When EA inode <15> is found by find_inode_fast() in __ext4_iget(), it is found that the EA inode holds the I_FREEING flag and waits for the EA inode to complete deletion. As a result, when inode <15> is being deleted, we wait for inode <15> to complete the deletion, resulting in an infinite loop and triggering Hung Task. To solve this problem, we only need to check whether the ino of EA inode and parent is the same before getting EA inode.

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix task hung in ext4_xattr_delete_inode Syzbot reported a hung task problem: ================================================================== INFO: task syz-executor232:5073 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc2-syzkaller-00024-g512dee0c00ad #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-exec232 state:D stack:21024 pid:5073 ppid:5072 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5244 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6555 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6631 __wait_on_freeing_inode fs/inode.c:2196 [inline] find_inode_fast+0x35a/0x4c0 fs/inode.c:950 iget_locked+0xb1/0x830 fs/inode.c:1273 __ext4_iget+0x22e/0x3ed0 fs/ext4/inode.c:4861 ext4_xattr_inode_iget+0x68/0x4e0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:389 ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all+0x1a7/0xe50 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1148 ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xb04/0xcd0 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2880 ext4_evict_inode+0xd7c/0x10b0 fs/ext4/inode.c:296 evict+0x2a4/0x620 fs/inode.c:664 ext4_orphan_cleanup+0xb60/0x1340 fs/ext4/orphan.c:474 __ext4_fill_super fs/ext4/super.c:5516 [inline] ext4_fill_super+0x81cd/0x8700 fs/ext4/super.c:5644 get_tree_bdev+0x400/0x620 fs/super.c:1282 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x270 fs/super.c:1489 do_new_mount+0x289/0xad0 fs/namespace.c:3145 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3488 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3697 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2d3/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3674 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7fa5406fd5ea RSP: 002b:00007ffc7232f968 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fa5406fd5ea RDX: 0000000020000440 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 00007ffc7232f970 RBP: 00007ffc7232f970 R08: 00007ffc7232f9b0 R09: 0000000000000432 R10: 0000000000804a03 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 0000555556a7a2c0 R14: 00007ffc7232f9b0 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> ================================================================== The problem is that the inode contains an xattr entry with ea_inum of 15 when cleaning up an orphan inode <15>. When evict inode <15>, the reference counting of the corresponding EA inode is decreased. When EA inode <15> is found by find_inode_fast() in __ext4_iget(), it is found that the EA inode holds the I_FREEING flag and waits for the EA inode to complete deletion. As a result, when inode <15> is being deleted, we wait for inode <15> to complete the deletion, resulting in an infinite loop and triggering Hung Task. To solve this problem, we only need to check whether the ino of EA inode and parent is the same before getting EA inode.

Why

A malformed condition prevents a loop from making progress or terminating, allowing resource exhaustion.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-835 ↗

CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop'). The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-835
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250507Security Bulletin 07 May 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 May 2025, published on 7 May 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53078 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53079 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53098 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53078 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53079 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53082 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53095 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53078 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53079 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53098 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0560Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53078 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53079 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53082 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53095 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53098 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53078 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53079 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53080 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53082 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53082 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53094 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53095 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-53066 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53068 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53068 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53075 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53075 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53077 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53078 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53078 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53079 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53089 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53092 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53096 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53096 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53098 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53099 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-030000Linux の Linux Kernel における無限ループに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、無限ループに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: e50e5129f384ae282adebfb561189cdb19b81cee < efddc7e106fdf8d1f62d45e79de78f63b7c04fba, e50e5129f384ae282adebfb561189cdb19b81cee < 64b72f5e7574020dea62ab733d88a54d903c42a1, e50e5129f384ae282adebfb561189cdb19b81cee < 2c96c52aeaa6fd9163cfacdd98778b4a0398ef18, e50e5129f384ae282adebfb561189cdb19b81cee < a98160d8f3e6242ca9b7f443f26e7ef3a61ba684, e50e5129f384ae282adebfb561189cdb19b81cee < 1aec41c98cce61d19ce89650895e51b9f3cdef13, e50e5129f384ae282adebfb561189cdb19b81cee < 94fd091576b12540924f6316ebc0678e84cb2800, e50e5129f384ae282adebfb561189cdb19b81cee < 73f7987fe1b82596f1a380e85cd0097ebaae7e01, e50e5129f384ae282adebfb561189cdb19b81cee < 0f7bfd6f8164be32dbbdf36aa1e5d00485c53cd7, 4.13
Fixed
Linux: < 4.13, 4.14.311 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.279 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.238 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.176 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.104 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.21 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.2.8 ≤ 6.2.*, 6.3 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 May 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:38 UTC · CWE-835 · Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-13160
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-53089 · cve.blacktree.nl