BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2023-52925High confidence

netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-59444

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired nftables selftests fail: run-tests.sh testcases/sets/0044interval_overlap_0 Expected: 0-2 . 0-3, got: W: [FAILED] ./testcases/sets/0044interval_overlap_0: got 1 Insertion must ignore duplicate but expired entries. Moreover, there is a strange asymmetry in nft_pipapo_activate: It refetches the current element, whereas the other ->activate callbacks (bitmap, hash, rhash, rbtree) use elem->priv. Same for .remove: other set implementations take elem->priv, nft_pipapo_remove fetches elem->priv, then does a relookup, remove this. I suspect this was the reason for the change that prompted the removal of the expired check in pipapo_get() in the first place, but skipping exired elements there makes no sense to me, this helper is used for normal get requests, insertions (duplicate check) and deactivate callback. In first two cases expired elements must be skipped. For ->deactivate(), this gets called for DELSETELEM, so it seems to me that expired elements should be skipped as well, i.e. delete request should fail with -ENOENT error.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired nftables selftests fail: run-tests.sh testcases/sets/0044interval_overlap_0 Expected: 0-2 . 0-3, got: W: [FAILED] ./testcases/sets/0044interval_overlap_0: got 1 Insertion must ignore duplicate but expired entries. Moreover, there is a strange asymmetry in nft_pipapo_activate: It refetches the current element, whereas the other ->activate callbacks (bitmap, hash, rhash, rbtree) use elem->priv. Same for .remove: other set implementations take elem->priv, nft_pipapo_remove fetches elem->priv, then does a relookup, remove this. I suspect this was the reason for the change that prompted the removal of the expired check in pipapo_get() in the first place, but skipping exired elements there makes no sense to me, this helper is used for normal get requests, insertions (duplicate check) and deactivate callback. In first two cases expired elements must be skipped. For ->deactivate(), this gets called for DELSETELEM, so it seems to me that expired elements should be skipped as well, i.e. delete request should fail with -ENOENT error.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: don't fail inserts if duplicate has expired nftables selftests fail: run-tests.sh testcases/sets/0044interval_overlap_0 Expected: 0-2 . 0-3, got: W: [FAILED] ./testcases/sets/0044interval_overlap_0: got 1 Insertion must ignore duplicate but expired entries. Moreover, there is a strange asymmetry in nft_pipapo_activate: It refetches the current element, whereas the other ->activate callbacks (bitmap, hash, rhash, rbtree) use elem->priv. Same for .remove: other set implementations take elem->priv, nft_pipapo_remove fetches elem->priv, then does a relookup, remove this. I suspect this was the reason for the change that prompted the removal of the expired check in pipapo_get() in the first place, but skipping exired elements there makes no sense to me, this helper is used for normal get requests, insertions (duplicate check) and deactivate callback. In first two cases expired elements must be skipped. For ->deactivate(), this gets called for DELSETELEM, so it seems to me that expired elements should be skipped as well, i.e. delete request should fail with -ENOENT error.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-1439Dell Secure Connect Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Secure Connect Gateway ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-0265Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Daten zu manipulieren und um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu verursachen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ecord?id=CVE-2022-50231 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50233 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50327 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50367 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50409 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50490 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1990 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3111 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53044 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ERecord?id=CVE-2022-50252 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1990 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28866 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3111 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31248 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3772 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39197 Référence CVE CVE-2023-42753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42753 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53042 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53042 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2022-50220 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50222 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50226 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50229 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50231 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3111 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53097 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26808 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26935 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ecord?id=CVE-2022-50226 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50229 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50231 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1989 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3111 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52500 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52927 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53020 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53020 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53032 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53032 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53046 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53048 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53063 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53076 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ecord?id=CVE-2022-50222 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50226 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50229 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50231 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1990 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3111 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53039 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53040 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53040 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53041 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53044 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53045 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53045 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0234Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ecord?id=CVE-2021-47633 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48911 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1192 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26708 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40980 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42159 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-33951 Référence CVE CVE-2023-33952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33952 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52646 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24860 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24860 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26708 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26758 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0183Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

es. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0771-1 du 03 mars 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250771-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0784-1 du 05 mars 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250784-1 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26708 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41055 Référence CVE CVE-2024-44974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44974 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45009 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45009 Référence CVE CVE-2024-45010 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
b15ea4017af82011dd55225ce77cce3d4dfc169c < 891ca5dfe3b718b441fc786014a7ba8f517da188; 7c7e658a36f8b1522bd3586d8137e5f93a25ddc5 < af78b0489e8898a8c9449ffc0fdd2e181916f0d4; 59dab3bf0b8fc08eb802721c0532f13dd89209b8 < 59ee68c437c562170265194a99698c805a686bb3; bd156ce9553dcaf2d6ee2c825d1a5a1718e86524 < 156369a702c33ad5434a19c3a689bfb836d4e0b8; 24138933b97b055d486e8064b4a1721702442a9b < 7845914f45f066497ac75b30c50dbc735e84e884; 94313a196b44184b5b52c1876da6a537701b425a; 1da4874d05da1526b11b82fc7f3c7ac38749ddf8; 4.19.316 < 4.20
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 5 Feb 2025 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:27 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-59444
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-52925 · cve.blacktree.nl