BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2023-52843High confidence

llc: verify mac len before reading mac header

Linux · Linux

Official source article: Siemens SSA-613116 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.6.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.64-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.6.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.6.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-613116 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-613116: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.1
3 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: llc: verify mac len before reading mac header
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-59556

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: llc: verify mac len before reading mac header LLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb has an Ethernet header. Syzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert packets without mac len and with user configurable skb->protocol (passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI). BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline] llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline] netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782 tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555 tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 Add a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc. There are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are protected by a test skb->protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not protect against this tun scenario. But the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will indirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any other LLC code. It is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but not sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume an Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3 protocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used to, on top of Token Ring. At least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start of git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in this commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all stable kernels should receive this.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: llc: verify mac len before reading mac header LLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb has an Ethernet header. Syzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert packets without mac len and with user configurable skb->protocol (passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI). BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline] llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline] netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782 tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555 tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 Add a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc. There are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are protected by a test skb->protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not protect against this tun scenario. But the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will indirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any other LLC code. It is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but not sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume an Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3 protocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used to, on top of Token Ring. At least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start of git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in this commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all stable kernels should receive this.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: llc: verify mac len before reading mac header LLC reads the mac header with eth_hdr without verifying that the skb has an Ethernet header. Syzbot was able to enter llc_rcv on a tun device. Tun can insert packets without mac len and with user configurable skb->protocol (passing a tun_pi header when not configuring IFF_NO_PI). BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_station_ac_send_test_r net/llc/llc_station.c:81 [inline] llc_station_rcv+0x6fb/0x1290 net/llc/llc_station.c:111 llc_rcv+0xc5d/0x14a0 net/llc/llc_input.c:218 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5523 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x1a6/0x5a0 net/core/dev.c:5637 netif_receive_skb_internal net/core/dev.c:5723 [inline] netif_receive_skb+0x58/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5782 tun_rx_batched+0x3ee/0x980 drivers/net/tun.c:1555 tun_get_user+0x54c5/0x69c0 drivers/net/tun.c:2002 Add a mac_len test before all three eth_hdr(skb) calls under net/llc. There are further uses in include/net/llc_pdu.h. All these are protected by a test skb->protocol == ETH_P_802_2. Which does not protect against this tun scenario. But the mac_len test added in this patch in llc_fixup_skb will indirectly protect those too. That is called from llc_rcv before any other LLC code. It is tempting to just add a blanket mac_len check in llc_rcv, but not sure whether that could break valid LLC paths that do not assume an Ethernet header. 802.2 LLC may be used on top of non-802.3 protocols in principle. The below referenced commit shows that used to, on top of Token Ring. At least one of the three eth_hdr uses goes back to before the start of git history. But the one that syzbot exercises is introduced in this commit. That commit is old enough (2008), that effectively all stable kernels should receive this.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use of Uninitialized Resource → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-908 ↗

CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource. The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
Stolen credentials, tokens and legitimate administration functions may provide continued access without deploying a large custom toolset.
CWE-908
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1197Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und unspezifische Angriffe

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder unspezifische Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2023-52813 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52858 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52858 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52864 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52864 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52865 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52833 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52833 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0632Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52833 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52836 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52838 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52838 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52841 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52842 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52844 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52847 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52847 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52849 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52850 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52851 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0610Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-52809 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5281 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52819 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0578Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-52787 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52808 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52809 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5281 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5281 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52832 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52834 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52835 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52843 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52843 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52845 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52846 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52855 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52869 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52869 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52882 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52882 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52884 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52884 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-029796Linux の Linux Kernel における初期化されていないリソースの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、初期化されていないリソースの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 < 900a4418e3f66a32db6baaf23f92b99c20ae6535, f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 < 9a3f9054a5227d7567cba1fb821df48ccecad10c, f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 < cbdcdf42d15dac74c7287679fb2a9d955f8feb1f, f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 < 3a2653828ffc6101aef80bf58d5b77484239f779, f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 < 352887b3edd007cf9b0abc30fe9d98622acd859b, f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 < f980e9a57dfb9530f1f4ee41a2420f2a256d7b29, f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 < 0a720d0259ad3521ec6c9e4199f9f6fc75bac77a, f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 < ff5cb6a4f0c6d7fbdc84858323fb4b7af32cfd79, f83f1768f833cb45bc93429fdc552252a4f55ac3 < 7b3ba18703a63f6fd487183b9262b08e5632da1b, 2.6.25
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.25, 4.14.330 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.299 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.261 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.201 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.139 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.63 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.5.12 ≤ 6.5.*, 6.6.2 ≤ 6.6.*, 6.7 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 May 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:34 UTC · CWE-908 · Use of Uninitialized Resource

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-59556
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-52843 · cve.blacktree.nl