BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2023-52737High confidence

btrfs: lock the inode in shared mode before starting fiemap

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 1 Jun 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2023-52737 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 59 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2023-52737
15 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP5 CHOST Images for Google
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Microsoft Azure
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: lock the inode in shared mode before starting fiemap Currently fiemap does not take the inode's lock (VFS lock), it only locks a file range in the inode's io tree. This however can lead to a deadlock if we have a concurrent fsync on the file and fiemap code triggers a fault when accessing the user space buffer with fiemap_fill_next_extent(). The deadlock happens on the inode's i_mmap_lock semaphore, which is taken both by fsync and btrfs_page_mkwrite(). This deadlock was recently reported by syzbot and triggers a trace like the following: task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:20264 pid:5668 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 wait_on_state fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:707 [inline] wait_extent_bit+0x577/0x6f0 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:751 lock_extent+0x1c2/0x280 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:1742 find_lock_delalloc_range+0x4e6/0x9c0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:488 writepage_delalloc+0x1ef/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1863 __extent_writepage+0x736/0x14e0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2174 extent_write_cache_pages+0x983/0x1220 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3091 extent_writepages+0x219/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3211 do_writepages+0x3c3/0x680 mm/page-writeback.c:2581 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x11e/0x170 mm/filemap.c:388 __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:421 [inline] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x175/0x200 mm/filemap.c:439 btrfs_fdatawrite_range fs/btrfs/file.c:3850 [inline] start_ordered_ops fs/btrfs/file.c:1737 [inline] btrfs_sync_file+0x4ff/0x1190 fs/btrfs/file.c:1839 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2885 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0xcd3/0x1280 fs/btrfs/file.c:1684 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2189 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline] vfs_write+0x7dc/0xc50 fs/read_write.c:584 ksys_write+0x177/0x2a0 fs/read_write.c:637 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f7d4054e9b9 RSP: 002b:00007f7d404fa2f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7d405d87a0 RCX: 00007f7d4054e9b9 RDX: 0000000000000090 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007f7d405a51d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 61635f65646f6e69 R13: 65646f7475616f6e R14: 7261637369646f6e R15: 00007f7d405d87a8 INFO: task syz-executor361:5697 blocked for more than 145 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-syzkaller-00376-g7c6984405241 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:21216 pid:5697 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x5f9/0x930 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1095 __down_read_common+0x54/0x2a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1260 btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x417/0xc80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8526 do_page_mkwrite+0x19e/0x5e0 mm/memory.c:2947 wp_page_shared+0x15e/0x380 mm/memory.c:3295 handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:4949 [inline] __handle_mm_fault mm/memory.c:5073 [inline] handle_mm_fault+0x1b79/0x26b0 mm/memory.c:5219 do_user_addr_fault+0x69b/0xcb0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1428 handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1519 [inline] exc_page_fault+0x7a/0x110 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1575 asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:570 RIP: 0010:copy_user_short_string+0xd/0x40 arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:233 Code: 74 0a 89 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc9000570f330 EFLAGS: 000502 ---truncated---
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-59456

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: lock the inode in shared mode before starting fiemap Currently fiemap does not take the inode's lock (VFS lock), it only locks a file range in the inode's io tree. This however can lead to a deadlock if we have a concurrent fsync on the file and fiemap code triggers a fault when accessing the user space buffer with fiemap_fill_next_extent(). The deadlock happens on the inode's i_mmap_lock semaphore, which is taken both by fsync and btrfs_page_mkwrite(). This deadlock was recently reported by syzbot and triggers a trace like the following: task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:20264 pid:5668 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 wait_on_state fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:707 [inline] wait_extent_bit+0x577/0x6f0 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:751 lock_extent+0x1c2/0x280 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:1742 find_lock_delalloc_range+0x4e6/0x9c0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:488 writepage_delalloc+0x1ef/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1863 __extent_writepage+0x736/0x14e0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2174 extent_write_cache_pages+0x983/0x1220 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3091 extent_writepages+0x219/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3211 do_writepages+0x3c3/0x680 mm/page-writeback.c:2581 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x11e/0x170 mm/filemap.c:388 __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:421 [inline] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x175/0x200 mm/filemap.c:439 btrfs_fdatawrite_range fs/btrfs/file.c:3850 [inline] start_ordered_ops fs/btrfs/file.c:1737 [inline] btrfs_sync_file+0x4ff/0x1190 fs/btrfs/file.c:1839 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2885 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0xcd3/0x1280 fs/btrfs/file.c:1684 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2189 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline] vfs_write+0x7dc/0xc50 fs/read_write.c:584 ksys_write+0x177/0x2a0 fs/read_write.c:637 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f7d4054e9b9 RSP: 002b:00007f7d404fa2f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7d405d87a0 RCX: 00007f7d4054e9b9 RDX: 0000000000000090 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007f7d405a51d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 61635f65646f6e69 R13: 65646f7475616f6e R14: 7261637369646f6e R15: 00007f7d405d87a8 </TASK> INFO: task syz-executor361:5697 blocked for more than 145 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-syzkaller-00376-g7c6984405241 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:21216 pid:5697 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x5f9/0x930 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1095 __down_read_common+0x54/0x2a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1260 btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x417/0xc80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8526 do_page_mkwrite+0x19e/0x5e0 mm/memory.c:2947 wp_page_shared+0x15e/0x380 mm/memory.c:3295 handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:4949 [inline] __handle_mm_fault mm/memory.c:5073 [inline] handle_mm_fault+0x1b79/0x26b0 mm/memory.c:5219 do_user_addr_fault+0x69b/0xcb0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1428 handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1519 [inline] exc_page_fault+0x7a/0x110 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1575 asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:570 RIP: 0010:copy_user_short_string+0xd/0x40 arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:233 Code: 74 0a 89 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc9000570f330 EFLAGS: 000502 ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: lock the inode in shared mode before starting fiemap Currently fiemap does not take the inode's lock (VFS lock), it only locks a file range in the inode's io tree. This however can lead to a deadlock if we have a concurrent fsync on the file and fiemap code triggers a fault when accessing the user space buffer with fiemap_fill_next_extent(). The deadlock happens on the inode's i_mmap_lock semaphore, which is taken both by fsync and btrfs_page_mkwrite(). This deadlock was recently reported by syzbot and triggers a trace like the following: task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:20264 pid:5668 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 wait_on_state fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:707 [inline] wait_extent_bit+0x577/0x6f0 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:751 lock_extent+0x1c2/0x280 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:1742 find_lock_delalloc_range+0x4e6/0x9c0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:488 writepage_delalloc+0x1ef/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1863 __extent_writepage+0x736/0x14e0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2174 extent_write_cache_pages+0x983/0x1220 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3091 extent_writepages+0x219/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3211 do_writepages+0x3c3/0x680 mm/page-writeback.c:2581 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x11e/0x170 mm/filemap.c:388 __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:421 [inline] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x175/0x200 mm/filemap.c:439 btrfs_fdatawrite_range fs/btrfs/file.c:3850 [inline] start_ordered_ops fs/btrfs/file.c:1737 [inline] btrfs_sync_file+0x4ff/0x1190 fs/btrfs/file.c:1839 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2885 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0xcd3/0x1280 fs/btrfs/file.c:1684 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2189 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline] vfs_write+0x7dc/0xc50 fs/read_write.c:584 ksys_write+0x177/0x2a0 fs/read_write.c:637 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f7d4054e9b9 RSP: 002b:00007f7d404fa2f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7d405d87a0 RCX: 00007f7d4054e9b9 RDX: 0000000000000090 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007f7d405a51d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 61635f65646f6e69 R13: 65646f7475616f6e R14: 7261637369646f6e R15: 00007f7d405d87a8 </TASK> INFO: task syz-executor361:5697 blocked for more than 145 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-syzkaller-00376-g7c6984405241 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:21216 pid:5697 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x5f9/0x930 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1095 __down_read_common+0x54/0x2a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1260 btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x417/0xc80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8526 do_page_mkwrite+0x19e/0x5e0 mm/memory.c:2947 wp_page_shared+0x15e/0x380 mm/memory.c:3295 handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:4949 [inline] __handle_mm_fault mm/memory.c:5073 [inline] handle_mm_fault+0x1b79/0x26b0 mm/memory.c:5219 do_user_addr_fault+0x69b/0xcb0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1428 handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1519 [inline] exc_page_fault+0x7a/0x110 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1575 asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:570 RIP: 0010:copy_user_short_string+0xd/0x40 arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:233 Code: 74 0a 89 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc9000570f330 EFLAGS: 000502 ---truncated---

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: lock the inode in shared mode before starting fiemap Currently fiemap does not take the inode's lock (VFS lock), it only locks a file range in the inode's io tree. This however can lead to a deadlock if we have a concurrent fsync on the file and fiemap code triggers a fault when accessing the user space buffer with fiemap_fill_next_extent(). The deadlock happens on the inode's i_mmap_lock semaphore, which is taken both by fsync and btrfs_page_mkwrite(). This deadlock was recently reported by syzbot and triggers a trace like the following: task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:20264 pid:5668 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 wait_on_state fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:707 [inline] wait_extent_bit+0x577/0x6f0 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:751 lock_extent+0x1c2/0x280 fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.c:1742 find_lock_delalloc_range+0x4e6/0x9c0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:488 writepage_delalloc+0x1ef/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1863 __extent_writepage+0x736/0x14e0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2174 extent_write_cache_pages+0x983/0x1220 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3091 extent_writepages+0x219/0x540 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3211 do_writepages+0x3c3/0x680 mm/page-writeback.c:2581 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x11e/0x170 mm/filemap.c:388 __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:421 [inline] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x175/0x200 mm/filemap.c:439 btrfs_fdatawrite_range fs/btrfs/file.c:3850 [inline] start_ordered_ops fs/btrfs/file.c:1737 [inline] btrfs_sync_file+0x4ff/0x1190 fs/btrfs/file.c:1839 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2885 [inline] btrfs_do_write_iter+0xcd3/0x1280 fs/btrfs/file.c:1684 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2189 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline] vfs_write+0x7dc/0xc50 fs/read_write.c:584 ksys_write+0x177/0x2a0 fs/read_write.c:637 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f7d4054e9b9 RSP: 002b:00007f7d404fa2f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f7d405d87a0 RCX: 00007f7d4054e9b9 RDX: 0000000000000090 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007f7d405a51d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 61635f65646f6e69 R13: 65646f7475616f6e R14: 7261637369646f6e R15: 00007f7d405d87a8 </TASK> INFO: task syz-executor361:5697 blocked for more than 145 seconds. Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-syzkaller-00376-g7c6984405241 #0 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor361 state:D stack:21216 pid:5697 ppid:5119 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: <TASK> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline] __schedule+0x995/0xe20 kernel/sched/core.c:6606 schedule+0xcb/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x5f9/0x930 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1095 __down_read_common+0x54/0x2a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1260 btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x417/0xc80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8526 do_page_mkwrite+0x19e/0x5e0 mm/memory.c:2947 wp_page_shared+0x15e/0x380 mm/memory.c:3295 handle_pte_fault mm/memory.c:4949 [inline] __handle_mm_fault mm/memory.c:5073 [inline] handle_mm_fault+0x1b79/0x26b0 mm/memory.c:5219 do_user_addr_fault+0x69b/0xcb0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1428 handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1519 [inline] exc_page_fault+0x7a/0x110 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1575 asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:570 RIP: 0010:copy_user_short_string+0xd/0x40 arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S:233 Code: 74 0a 89 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc9000570f330 EFLAGS: 000502 ---truncated---

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1197Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und unspezifische Angriffe

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder unspezifische Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1229Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

e sécurité Ubuntu USN-8818-1 du 24 septembre 2026 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8818-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-1093Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

/notices/USN-8666-3 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0985Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

de sécurité Ubuntu USN-8620-4 du 31 juillet 2026 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8620-4 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0954Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

/notices/USN-8623-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53673 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0926Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

de sécurité Ubuntu USN-8597-1 du 23 juillet 2026 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8597-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50073 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50116 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45896 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53596 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41079 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2023-52657 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52701 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52761 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2023-52657 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52701 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52761 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52669 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52672 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0610Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52753 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52808 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0578Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52502 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52658 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52658 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52667 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52667 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52672 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52672 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52735 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52754 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52762 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52764 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52784 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-027829Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 5.13, 5.15.209 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.13 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 May 2024 · Last source change 1 Jun 2026, 16:04 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-59456
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-59456↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-52737 · cve.blacktree.nl