BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2023-52732High confidence

ceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace

Linux · Linux

9.8CriticalCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityCriticalOperational priority:Critical, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.53% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.15-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-59451

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Critical technical impact with a remotely reachable, unauthenticated path; no CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace When received corrupted snap trace we don't know what exactly has happened in MDS side. And we shouldn't continue IOs and metadatas access to MDS, which may corrupt or get incorrect contents. This patch will just block all the further IO/MDS requests immediately and then evict the kclient itself. The reason why we still need to evict the kclient just after blocking all the further IOs is that the MDS could revoke the caps faster.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace When received corrupted snap trace we don't know what exactly has happened in MDS side. And we shouldn't continue IOs and metadatas access to MDS, which may corrupt or get incorrect contents. This patch will just block all the further IO/MDS requests immediately and then evict the kclient itself. The reason why we still need to evict the kclient just after blocking all the further IOs is that the MDS could revoke the caps faster.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace When received corrupted snap trace we don't know what exactly has happened in MDS side. And we shouldn't continue IOs and metadatas access to MDS, which may corrupt or get incorrect contents. This patch will just block all the further IO/MDS requests immediately and then evict the kclient itself. The reason why we still need to evict the kclient just after blocking all the further IOs is that the MDS could revoke the caps faster.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-0225Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain ausnutzen, um erhöhte Rechte zu erlangen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1197Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und unspezifische Angriffe

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder unspezifische Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240522Security Bulletin 22 May 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 22 May 2024, published on 22 May 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2023-52653 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52701 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52761 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2023-52653 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52657 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52660 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52673 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52676 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52682 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52700 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52701 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52749 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52761 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52837 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0526Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52698 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52702 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52705 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52708 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52731 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52733 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52736 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52738 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52739 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52740 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52741 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52742 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0496Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52698 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52699 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52699 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52702 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52702 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52703 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52705 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52705 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52707 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52707 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52708 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52730 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52731 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52732 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52733 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52736 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52736 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52738 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52739 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52740 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52740 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52741 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52742 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-029833Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 9030aaf9bf0a1eee47a154c316c789e959638b0f < 66ec619e4591f8350f99c5269a7ce160cccc7a7c, 9030aaf9bf0a1eee47a154c316c789e959638b0f < a68e564adcaa69b0930809fb64d9d5f7d9c32ba9, 2.6.34
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.34, 6.1.13 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 May 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-59451
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-52732 · cve.blacktree.nl