BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2023-52572High confidence

cifs: Fix UAF in cifs_demultiplex_thread()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 43 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.23% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 43 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.5.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.64-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.5.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.5.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2023-52572 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: cifs: use-after-free in cifs_demultiplex_thread()
42 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A use-after-free flaw was found in cifs_demultiplex_thread() in the Linux kernel. This may lead to a crash.
Remediation
Out of support scope
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-57196

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 43 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cifs: Fix UAF in cifs_demultiplex_thread() There is a UAF when xfstests on cifs: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in smb2_is_network_name_deleted+0x27/0x160 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88810103fc08 by task cifsd/923 CPU: 1 PID: 923 Comm: cifsd Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4+ #45 ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 print_report+0x171/0x472 kasan_report+0xad/0x130 kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0 smb2_is_network_name_deleted+0x27/0x160 cifs_demultiplex_thread.cold+0x172/0x5a4 kthread+0x165/0x1a0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> Allocated by task 923: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x54/0x60 kmem_cache_alloc+0x147/0x320 mempool_alloc+0xe1/0x260 cifs_small_buf_get+0x24/0x60 allocate_buffers+0xa1/0x1c0 cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x199/0x10d0 kthread+0x165/0x1a0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Freed by task 921: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x40 ____kasan_slab_free+0x143/0x1b0 kmem_cache_free+0xe3/0x4d0 cifs_small_buf_release+0x29/0x90 SMB2_negotiate+0x8b7/0x1c60 smb2_negotiate+0x51/0x70 cifs_negotiate_protocol+0xf0/0x160 cifs_get_smb_ses+0x5fa/0x13c0 mount_get_conns+0x7a/0x750 cifs_mount+0x103/0xd00 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x1dd/0xcb0 smb3_get_tree+0x1d5/0x300 vfs_get_tree+0x41/0xf0 path_mount+0x9b3/0xdd0 __x64_sys_mount+0x190/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 The UAF is because: mount(pid: 921) | cifsd(pid: 923) -------------------------------|------------------------------- | cifs_demultiplex_thread SMB2_negotiate | cifs_send_recv | compound_send_recv | smb_send_rqst | wait_for_response | wait_event_state [1] | | standard_receive3 | cifs_handle_standard | handle_mid | mid->resp_buf = buf; [2] | dequeue_mid [3] KILL the process [4] | resp_iov[i].iov_base = buf | free_rsp_buf [5] | | is_network_name_deleted [6] | callback 1. After send request to server, wait the response until mid->mid_state != SUBMITTED; 2. Receive response from server, and set it to mid; 3. Set the mid state to RECEIVED; 4. Kill the process, the mid state already RECEIVED, get 0; 5. Handle and release the negotiate response; 6. UAF. It can be easily reproduce with add some delay in [3] - [6]. Only sync call has the problem since async call's callback is executed in cifsd process. Add an extra state to mark the mid state to READY before wakeup the waitter, then it can get the resp safely.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cifs: Fix UAF in cifs_demultiplex_thread() There is a UAF when xfstests on cifs: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in smb2_is_network_name_deleted+0x27/0x160 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88810103fc08 by task cifsd/923 CPU: 1 PID: 923 Comm: cifsd Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4+ #45 ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 print_report+0x171/0x472 kasan_report+0xad/0x130 kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0 smb2_is_network_name_deleted+0x27/0x160 cifs_demultiplex_thread.cold+0x172/0x5a4 kthread+0x165/0x1a0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> Allocated by task 923: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x54/0x60 kmem_cache_alloc+0x147/0x320 mempool_alloc+0xe1/0x260 cifs_small_buf_get+0x24/0x60 allocate_buffers+0xa1/0x1c0 cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x199/0x10d0 kthread+0x165/0x1a0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Freed by task 921: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x40 ____kasan_slab_free+0x143/0x1b0 kmem_cache_free+0xe3/0x4d0 cifs_small_buf_release+0x29/0x90 SMB2_negotiate+0x8b7/0x1c60 smb2_negotiate+0x51/0x70 cifs_negotiate_protocol+0xf0/0x160 cifs_get_smb_ses+0x5fa/0x13c0 mount_get_conns+0x7a/0x750 cifs_mount+0x103/0xd00 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x1dd/0xcb0 smb3_get_tree+0x1d5/0x300 vfs_get_tree+0x41/0xf0 path_mount+0x9b3/0xdd0 __x64_sys_mount+0x190/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 The UAF is because: mount(pid: 921) | cifsd(pid: 923) -------------------------------|------------------------------- | cifs_demultiplex_thread SMB2_negotiate | cifs_send_recv | compound_send_recv | smb_send_rqst | wait_for_response | wait_event_state [1] | | standard_receive3 | cifs_handle_standard | handle_mid | mid->resp_buf = buf; [2] | dequeue_mid [3] KILL the process [4] | resp_iov[i].iov_base = buf | free_rsp_buf [5] | | is_network_name_deleted [6] | callback 1. After send request to server, wait the response until mid->mid_state != SUBMITTED; 2. Receive response from server, and set it to mid; 3. Set the mid state to RECEIVED; 4. Kill the process, the mid state already RECEIVED, get 0; 5. Handle and release the negotiate response; 6. UAF. It can be easily reproduce with add some delay in [3] - [6]. Only sync call has the problem since async call's callback is executed in cifsd process. Add an extra state to mark the mid state to READY before wakeup the waitter, then it can get the resp safely.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cifs: Fix UAF in cifs_demultiplex_thread() There is a UAF when xfstests on cifs: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in smb2_is_network_name_deleted+0x27/0x160 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88810103fc08 by task cifsd/923 CPU: 1 PID: 923 Comm: cifsd Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4+ #45 ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 print_report+0x171/0x472 kasan_report+0xad/0x130 kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0 smb2_is_network_name_deleted+0x27/0x160 cifs_demultiplex_thread.cold+0x172/0x5a4 kthread+0x165/0x1a0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> Allocated by task 923: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x54/0x60 kmem_cache_alloc+0x147/0x320 mempool_alloc+0xe1/0x260 cifs_small_buf_get+0x24/0x60 allocate_buffers+0xa1/0x1c0 cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x199/0x10d0 kthread+0x165/0x1a0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Freed by task 921: kasan_save_stack+0x1e/0x40 kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x2a/0x40 ____kasan_slab_free+0x143/0x1b0 kmem_cache_free+0xe3/0x4d0 cifs_small_buf_release+0x29/0x90 SMB2_negotiate+0x8b7/0x1c60 smb2_negotiate+0x51/0x70 cifs_negotiate_protocol+0xf0/0x160 cifs_get_smb_ses+0x5fa/0x13c0 mount_get_conns+0x7a/0x750 cifs_mount+0x103/0xd00 cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x1dd/0xcb0 smb3_get_tree+0x1d5/0x300 vfs_get_tree+0x41/0xf0 path_mount+0x9b3/0xdd0 __x64_sys_mount+0x190/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 The UAF is because: mount(pid: 921) | cifsd(pid: 923) -------------------------------|------------------------------- | cifs_demultiplex_thread SMB2_negotiate | cifs_send_recv | compound_send_recv | smb_send_rqst | wait_for_response | wait_event_state [1] | | standard_receive3 | cifs_handle_standard | handle_mid | mid->resp_buf = buf; [2] | dequeue_mid [3] KILL the process [4] | resp_iov[i].iov_base = buf | free_rsp_buf [5] | | is_network_name_deleted [6] | callback 1. After send request to server, wait the response until mid->mid_state != SUBMITTED; 2. Receive response from server, and set it to mid; 3. Set the mid state to RECEIVED; 4. Kill the process, the mid state already RECEIVED, get 0; 5. Handle and release the negotiate response; 6. UAF. It can be easily reproduce with add some delay in [3] - [6]. Only sync call has the problem since async call's callback is executed in cifsd process. Add an extra state to mark the mid state to READY before wakeup the waitter, then it can get the resp safely.

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-0534Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder einen nicht spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240306Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024, published on 6 March 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47100 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4806 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4807 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4813 Référence CVE CVE-2023-48795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48795 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4911 Référence CVE CVE-2023-51074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51074 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5156 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5189 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5363 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5678 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5841 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5841 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5981 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6129 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-62

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0670Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7685-3 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7685-4 du 05 août 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7685-4 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7686-1 du 05 août 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7686-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21546 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48893 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49063 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49168 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49535 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52975 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0650Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

//ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7608-7 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7681-1 du 30 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7681-1 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7682-1 du 30 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7682-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21546 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48893 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49063 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49168 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49535 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7665-2 du 24 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7665-2 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21546 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48893 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49063 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49168 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49535 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49728 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35790 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35866 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0463Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS

d?id=CVE-2021-47247 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47489 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48893 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49046 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49046 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49190 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49219 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49219 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49309 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49309 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49546 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49728 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52621 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52857 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52927 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-24855 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24855 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26656 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0234Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

2025/suse-su-20250962-1 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47261 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47496 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47633 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48911 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1192 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26708 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26708 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949 Référence CVE CVE-2024-40980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49490 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49626 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49626 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49661 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49661 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0394 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1192 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1382 Référence CVE CVE-2023-33951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33951 Référence CVE CVE-2023-33952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33952 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52646 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52653 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52853 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52924 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52925 Référence CVE CVE-2023-6606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6606 Référence CVE CVE-2024-23307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2023-35827 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52434 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52488 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52497 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52498 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52532 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52621 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52639 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52821 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52889 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52904 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1013Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2022-48666 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48733 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48733 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48938 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48943 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52434 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52531 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52531 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52578 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52599 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52599 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52612 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52614 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52639 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0363Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52531 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52532 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52559 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52561 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52563 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52564 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52566 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52567 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52567 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52569 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52574 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52575 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52575 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52576 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52582 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52583 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52587 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52590 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52590 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-027588Linux の Linux Kernel における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.16, 5.4.297 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.237 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.181 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.56 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.5.6 ≤ 6.5.*, 6.6 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Mar 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-57196
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-52572 · cve.blacktree.nl