BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2023-52513High confidence

RDMA/siw: Fix connection failure handling

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 0.66% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.5.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.64-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.5.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.5.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-57138

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/siw: Fix connection failure handling In case immediate MPA request processing fails, the newly created endpoint unlinks the listening endpoint and is ready to be dropped. This special case was not handled correctly by the code handling the later TCP socket close, causing a NULL dereference crash in siw_cm_work_handler() when dereferencing a NULL listener. We now also cancel the useless MPA timeout, if immediate MPA request processing fails. This patch furthermore simplifies MPA processing in general: Scheduling a useless TCP socket read in sk_data_ready() upcall is now surpressed, if the socket is already moved out of TCP_ESTABLISHED state.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/siw: Fix connection failure handling In case immediate MPA request processing fails, the newly created endpoint unlinks the listening endpoint and is ready to be dropped. This special case was not handled correctly by the code handling the later TCP socket close, causing a NULL dereference crash in siw_cm_work_handler() when dereferencing a NULL listener. We now also cancel the useless MPA timeout, if immediate MPA request processing fails. This patch furthermore simplifies MPA processing in general: Scheduling a useless TCP socket read in sk_data_ready() upcall is now surpressed, if the socket is already moved out of TCP_ESTABLISHED state.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/siw: Fix connection failure handling In case immediate MPA request processing fails, the newly created endpoint unlinks the listening endpoint and is ready to be dropped. This special case was not handled correctly by the code handling the later TCP socket close, causing a NULL dereference crash in siw_cm_work_handler() when dereferencing a NULL listener. We now also cancel the useless MPA timeout, if immediate MPA request processing fails. This patch furthermore simplifies MPA processing in general: Scheduling a useless TCP socket read in sk_data_ready() upcall is now surpressed, if the socket is already moved out of TCP_ESTABLISHED state.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240306Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024, published on 6 March 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0017Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

n de code arbitraire, un contournement de la politique de sécurité et un déni de service. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:23463 du 17 décembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:23463 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:0173 du 07 janvier 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0173 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2026:0271 du 08 janvier 2026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:0271 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50406 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53226 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53297 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53322 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53365 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53365 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53393 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35868 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46679 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46679 Référence CVE CVE-2025-38718 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2023-52470 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52473 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52473 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52487 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52490 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52490 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52501 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52516 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52519 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52520 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52523 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52528 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52532 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52560 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0741Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Secure Analytics

Record?id=CVE-2023-4692 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4693 Référence CVE CVE-2023-48795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48795 Référence CVE CVE-2023-5090 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5090 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52425 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52439 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52445 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52464 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52520 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52528 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52560 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52565 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52578 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0646Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d?id=CVE-2023-45290 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45803 Référence CVE CVE-2023-46604 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46604 Référence CVE CVE-2023-48795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48795 Référence CVE CVE-2023-51767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51767 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52425 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52425 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52439 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52445 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52520 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52528 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52565 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52578 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52598 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0471Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

ecord?id=CVE-2021-47171 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47185 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48627 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48669 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2166 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2166 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2176 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52439 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52445 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52445 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52520 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52528 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52528 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52565 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52578 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52598 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52598 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52606 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0363Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52501 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52503 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52511 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52515 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52517 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52518 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52519 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52520 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52523 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52524 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52500 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52501 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52511 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52515 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52517 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52518 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52519 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52520 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52523 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52524 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-027615Linux の Linux Kernel における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 6c52fdc244b5ccc468006fd65a504d4ee33743c7 < 6e26812e289b374c17677d238164a5a8f5770594, 6c52fdc244b5ccc468006fd65a504d4ee33743c7 < 0d520cdb0cd095eac5d00078dfd318408c9b5eed, 6c52fdc244b5ccc468006fd65a504d4ee33743c7 < 81b7bf367eea795d259d0261710c6a89f548844d, 6c52fdc244b5ccc468006fd65a504d4ee33743c7 < 5cf38e638e5d01b68f9133968a85e8b3fd1ecf2f, 6c52fdc244b5ccc468006fd65a504d4ee33743c7 < eeafc50a77f6a783c2c44e7ec3674a7b693e06f8, 6c52fdc244b5ccc468006fd65a504d4ee33743c7 < 53a3f777049771496f791504e7dc8ef017cba590, 5.3
Fixed
Linux: < 5.3, 5.4.258 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.198 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.135 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.57 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.5.7 ≤ 6.5.*, 6.6 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Mar 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-57138
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-52513 · cve.blacktree.nl