BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2023-52507High confidence

nfc: nci: assert requested protocol is valid

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.5.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.64-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.5.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.5.8-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2023-52507 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 76 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2023-52507
239 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • reiserfs-kmp-default as component of SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: nci: assert requested protocol is valid The protocol is used in a bit mask to determine if the protocol is supported. Assert the provided protocol is less than the maximum defined so it doesn't potentially perform a shift-out-of-bounds and provide a clearer error for undefined protocols vs unsupported ones.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
SSA-613116 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-613116: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.1
3 known not affected

The vendor explicitly states that these products are not affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: nci: assert requested protocol is valid
Remediation
No remediation text is recorded.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-57132

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: nci: assert requested protocol is valid The protocol is used in a bit mask to determine if the protocol is supported. Assert the provided protocol is less than the maximum defined so it doesn't potentially perform a shift-out-of-bounds and provide a clearer error for undefined protocols vs unsupported ones.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: nci: assert requested protocol is valid The protocol is used in a bit mask to determine if the protocol is supported. Assert the provided protocol is less than the maximum defined so it doesn't potentially perform a shift-out-of-bounds and provide a clearer error for undefined protocols vs unsupported ones.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: nci: assert requested protocol is valid The protocol is used in a bit mask to determine if the protocol is supported. Assert the provided protocol is less than the maximum defined so it doesn't potentially perform a shift-out-of-bounds and provide a clearer error for undefined protocols vs unsupported ones.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240306Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 06 Mar 2024, published on 6 March 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0677Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

d?id=CVE-2023-52340 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52433 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52475 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52477 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52581 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52583 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52587 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52587 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52595 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52595 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0022Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

d?id=CVE-2022-48733 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48938 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48943 Référence CVE CVE-2023-35827 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35827 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52434 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52486 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52488 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52488 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52497 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52498 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52532 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52621 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52621 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52639 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2023-24023 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31315 Référence CVE CVE-2023-37453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37453 Référence CVE CVE-2023-38417 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-47210 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210 Référence CVE CVE-2023-51780 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51780 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52435 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52472 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52573 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52580 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52580 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52594 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52594 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52612 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52615 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52619 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0610Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ecord?id=CVE-2022-48760 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48761 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48772 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1829 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829 Référence CVE CVE-2023-24023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24023 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52622 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52622 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52675 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52683 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52683 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52693 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52693 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52737 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0363Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52492 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52493 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52494 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52497 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52500 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52501 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52503 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52511 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52515 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52517 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0329Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2023-52486 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52492 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52493 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52494 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52497 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52497 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52500 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52500 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52501 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52501 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52502 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52504 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52504 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52509 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52510 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52511 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52515 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52517 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-027857Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 3.2, 4.14.328 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.297 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.259 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.199 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.136 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.1.59 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.5.8 ≤ 6.5.*, 6.6 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 2 Mar 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:28 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-57132
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
CVE published
Fixed release or patch reference recorded
ENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-57132↗Vendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team↗CVE authority or vendor reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Patch or update reference↗Official CVE record (CNA and ADP data)↗NVD record↗
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-52507 · cve.blacktree.nl