BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2023
CVE-2023-4039High confidence

GCC's-fstack-protector fails to guard dynamically-sized local variables on AArch64

Arm Ltd · Arm GNU Toolchain

4.8MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

13 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-10Vendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.10.5.0-4ubuntu2Canonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-10-crossVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.23ubuntu2Canonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-10-cross-portsUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-11Vendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.11.4.0-4ubuntu1Canonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-11-crossVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.21ubuntu2Canonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-11-cross-portsUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-12-crossVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.19ubuntu2Canonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-12-cross-portsUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-9Vendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.9.5.0-6ubuntu2Canonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-9-crossVendor fix publishedCanonical reports that a fixed source package version has been published. Repository candidate availability is not checked by BlackTree.29ubuntu2Canonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-9-cross-portsUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-optUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivegcc-snapshotUnder evaluationCanonical reports that the package might be affected and still needs evaluation or fixing.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-355557 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-355557: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Third-Party Components in SINEC OS before V3.2
3 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)
  • SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family
  • SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Summary
A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity.
Remediation
Update to V3.2 or later version
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-53931

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

Medium technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

**DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself.

What

**DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself.

Why

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

**DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself.

Why

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Protection Mechanism Failure → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-693

CWE-693: Protection Mechanism Failure. The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ANoneAvailability impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-693Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2023-2679Oracle Communications: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Official advisory
BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2023-2351gcc: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehen von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in gcc ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2023-31085 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446 Référence CVE CVE-2023-36054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36054 Référence CVE CVE-2023-36632 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36632 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817 Référence CVE CVE-2023-38545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38545 Référence CVE CVE-2023-38546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38546 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39615 Référence CVE CVE-2023-40217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40217 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4039 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4387 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4387 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45322 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853 Référence CVE CVE-2023-46218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46218 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4641 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4807 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4813 Référence CVE CVE-2023-48795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2023-39326 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39327 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39328 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39593 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39615 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3978 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39978 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4016 Référence CVE CVE-2023-40217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40217 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4039 Référence CVE CVE-2023-40403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40403 Référence CVE CVE-2023-40745 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40745 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4091 Référence CVE CVE-2023-41175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-41175 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4154 Référence CVE CVE-2023-42669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42669 Référence CVE CVE-2023-42670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42670 Référence CVE CVE-2023-43887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0864Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

ecord?id=CVE-2023-36054 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817 Référence CVE CVE-2023-38546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38546 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39323 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39325 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39326 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39804 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4016 Référence CVE CVE-2023-40217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40217 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4039 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45285 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45288 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45289 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45290 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45918 Référence CVE CVE-2023-46218 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46218 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ecord?id=CVE-2023-37769 Référence CVE CVE-2023-38546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38546 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39017 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39017 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39325 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39615 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3978 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39810 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4016 Référence CVE CVE-2023-40217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40217 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4039 Référence CVE CVE-2023-40403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40403 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4156 Référence CVE CVE-2023-42366 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42366 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4320 Référence CVE CVE-2023-43785 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43785 Référence CVE CVE-2023-43786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43786 Référence CVE CVE-2023-43787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43787 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0524Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

ecord?id=CVE-2023-37920 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39318 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39319 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39323 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39326 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39328 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39329 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4016 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4039 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45285 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45285 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45287 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45288 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45289 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45289 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45290 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-1015Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

ord?id=CVE-2023-38546 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39128 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39128 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39189 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39189 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39192 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39192 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39193 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39194 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39194 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39615 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39615 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4016 Référence CVE CVE-2023-40283 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40283 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4039 Référence CVE CVE-2023-42754 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42754 Référence CVE CVE-2023-42755 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42755 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44317 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44317 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44318 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44319 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44320 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44321 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00); SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family; SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Update to V3.2 or later version
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 13 Sept 2023 · Last source change 23 Jun 2026, 17:19 UTC · CWE-693 · Protection Mechanism Failure

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-53931
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-4039 · cve.blacktree.nl