BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2023
CVE-2023-32559High confidence

A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x

NodeJS · Node

Official source article: Siemens SSA-915275 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 4 Nov 2025

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • EPSS is 1.80% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs NodeJS Node and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainnodejsVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.18.17.1-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainnodejsVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.18.17.1-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainnodejsVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.18.17.1-r0Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcenodejsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.18.13.0+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcenodejsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.18.19.0+dfsg-6~deb12u1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcenodejsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.18.13.0+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcenodejsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.18.13.0+dfsg1-1.1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
SSA-915275 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 1 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-915275: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SINEC INS Before V1.0 SP2 Update 3
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SINEC INS
Summary
A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x. The use of the deprecated API `process.binding()` can bypass the policy mechanism by requiring internal modules and eventually take advantage of `process.binding('spawn_sync')` run arbitrary code, outside of the limits defined in a `policy.json` file. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js.
Remediation
Update to V1.0 SP2 Update 3 or later version
SSA-943925 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 2 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-943925: Multiple Vulnerabilities in SINEC NMS before V2.0 SP1
1 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SINEC NMS
Summary
A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x. The use of the deprecated API `process.binding()` can bypass the policy mechanism by requiring internal modules and eventually take advantage of `process.binding('spawn_sync')` run arbitrary code, outside of the limits defined in a `policy.json` file. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js.
Remediation
Update to V2.0 SP1 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-36803

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x. The use of the deprecated API `process.binding()` can bypass the policy mechanism by requiring internal modules and eventually take advantage of `process.binding('spawn_sync')` run arbitrary code, outside of the limits defined in a `policy.json` file. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js.

What

A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x. The use of the deprecated API `process.binding()` can bypass the policy mechanism by requiring internal modules and eventually take advantage of `process.binding('spawn_sync')` run arbitrary code, outside of the limits defined in a `policy.json` file. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js.

Why

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

What

A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x. The use of the deprecated API `process.binding()` can bypass the policy mechanism by requiring internal modules and eventually take advantage of `process.binding('spawn_sync')` run arbitrary code, outside of the limits defined in a `policy.json` file. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js.

Why

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may execute code or commands in the affected security context.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Privilege Management → execute code or commands in the affected security context
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-269 ↗

CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
After compromise, an attacker may use built-in shells, scripting engines, scheduled tasks and native network utilities for discovery, persistence or movement. This is a plausible LoTL path, not evidence that it has occurred for every attack.
NetworkRemote code executionPrivilege escalationCWE-269Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-2917Xerox FreeFlow Print Server: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Xerox FreeFlow Print Server ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Verfügbarkeit und Integrität des Systems zu gefährden.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-2024Node.js: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Umgehen von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen

Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Node.js ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20230830Security Bulletin 30 Aug 2023

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 30 Aug 2023, published on 30 August 2023. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0145Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2023-29405 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29406 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29409 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2976 Référence CVE CVE-2023-30987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30987 Référence CVE CVE-2023-30991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30991 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32002 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32006 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32360 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32360 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32559 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32681 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32681 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32731 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32731 Référence CVE CVE-2023-33850 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33850 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34053 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34053 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34054 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34054 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34055 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34062 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34062 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0119Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

ecord?id=CVE-2023-32003 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32004 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32004 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32005 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32006 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32067 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3212 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32233 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3247 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32558 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32558 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32559 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32573 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32573 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3268 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3301 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3301 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3316 Référence CVE CVE-2023-33203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33203 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3390 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34035 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0113Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

d=CVE-2010-3300 Référence CVE CVE-2016-1000027 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-1000027 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25883 Référence CVE CVE-2022-40609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40609 Référence CVE CVE-2023-20883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20883 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22067 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22067 Référence CVE CVE-2023-22081 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-22081 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32002 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32006 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32559 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34149 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34149 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34396 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34453 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34454 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34455 Référence CVE CVE-2023-34462 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34462 Référence CVE CVE-2023-36478 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36478 Référence CVE CVE-2023-36479 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-011863Node.js Foundation の Node.js における脆弱性

Node.js Foundation の Node.js には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
NCSC-NL · Dutch · NCSC-2024-0433Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Siemens producten

De kwetsbaarheden stellen een kwaadwillende mogelijk in staat aanvallen uit te voeren die kunnen leiden tot de volgende categorieën schade: - Denial-of-Service (DoS) - Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) - Manipulatie van gegevens - Omzeilen van een beveiligingsmaatregel - Omzeilen van authenticatie - (Remote) code execution (Administrator/Root rechten) - (Remote) code execution (Gebruikersrechten) - Toegang tot systeemgegevens - Verhoogde gebruikersrechten De kwaadwillende heeft hiervoor toegang nodig tot de productieomgeving. Het is goed gebruik een dergelijke omgeving niet publiek toegankelijk te hebben.

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
SINEC INS
Fixed
No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 24 Aug 2023 · Last source change 4 Nov 2025, 16:10 UTC · CWE-269 · Improper Privilege Management

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-36803
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Mitigation available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Mitigation available
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-32559 · cve.blacktree.nl