BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2023-29483High confidence

n/a — DEPRECATED: Trusting Self-reported DNS Name

Unknown · Unknown

7.0HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Critical, raised one band.upgradedsince 4 Nov 2025

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • A structured source references public exploit or proof-of-concept material.
  • The selected CVSS metric records a network-reachable, unauthenticated path with no user interaction.
  • EPSS is 1.86% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Increase monitoring for the attack path and post-exploitation behaviour described in the report.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown Unknown and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 3 daysRemediation target: Within 90 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

4 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcednspythonVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.6.0-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcednspythonAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcednspythonVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.6.0-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcednspythonVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.6.0-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 7 Oct 2026
Open-source package ranges2 source-attributed ranges

These OSV and GitHub advisory ranges apply only to the named package and ecosystem. A listed fixed version is not a universal product patch or proof that an update is installed.

Ecosystem and packageAffected rangeFirst fixed versionEvidence
PyPIdnspythonECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 2.6.12.6.1OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
PyPIeventletECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 0.35.20.35.2OSV record ↗aggregator derived · 10 Sep 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

2 current
CVE-2023-29483 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 67 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2023-29483
23 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • python-dnspython as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • python3-dnspython as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1
  • python-dnspython as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-LTSS
  • python3-dnspython as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-LTSS
  • python-dnspython as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1
  • python3-dnspython as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1
  • python-dnspython as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP1
  • python3-dnspython as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP1
  • SLES 15 SP1 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP2 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP3 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
  • SLES 15 SP4 CHOST Images for Amazon EC2
Summary
eventlet before 0.35.2, as used in dnspython before 2.6.0, allows remote attackers to interfere with DNS name resolution by quickly sending an invalid packet from the expected IP address and source port, aka a "TuDoor" attack. In other words, dnspython does not have the preferred behavior in which the DNS name resolution algorithm would proceed, within the full time window, in order to wait for a valid packet. NOTE: dnspython 2.6.0 is unusable for a different reason that was addressed in 2.6.1.
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
CVE-2023-29483 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitydnspython: denial of service in stub resolver
6 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • aap-cloud-metrics-collector-container as a component of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2
  • python-dns.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • python-dns.src (python27:2.7) as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • python3-dns (python27:2.7) as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • python-eventlet.src as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1
  • python3-eventlet as a component of Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1
Summary
The dnspython stub resolver is vulnerable to a denial of service (DoS) risk if an attacker sends a malicious response forged with the correct address and port before a legitimate one arrives on the UDP port used by dnspython for the query. In such cases, dnspython could either switch to another resolver or abandon the query altogether, potentially leading to service denial for that resolution.
Remediation
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2024-1084

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity with public exploit material referenced by a structured source; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

eventlet before 0.35.2, as used in dnspython before 2.6.0, allows remote attackers to interfere with DNS name resolution by quickly sending an invalid packet from the expected IP address and source port, aka a "TuDoor" attack. In other words, dnspython does not have the preferred behavior in which the DNS name resolution algorithm would proceed, within the full time window, in order to wait for a valid packet. NOTE: dnspython 2.6.0 is unusable for a different reason that was addressed in 2.6.1.

What

eventlet before 0.35.2, as used in dnspython before 2.6.0, allows remote attackers to interfere with DNS name resolution by quickly sending an invalid packet from the expected IP address and source port, aka a "TuDoor" attack. In other words, dnspython does not have the preferred behavior in which the DNS name resolution algorithm would proceed, within the full time window, in order to wait for a valid packet. NOTE: dnspython 2.6.0 is unusable for a different reason that was addressed in 2.6.1.

Why

This entry has been deprecated because it was a duplicate of CWE-350. All content has been transferred to CWE-350.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

eventlet before 0.35.2, as used in dnspython before 2.6.0, allows remote attackers to interfere with DNS name resolution by quickly sending an invalid packet from the expected IP address and source port, aka a "TuDoor" attack. In other words, dnspython does not have the preferred behavior in which the DNS name resolution algorithm would proceed, within the full time window, in order to wait for a valid packet. NOTE: dnspython 2.6.0 is unusable for a different reason that was addressed in 2.6.1.

Why

This entry has been deprecated because it was a duplicate of CWE-350. All content has been transferred to CWE-350.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
Reference recorded

A structured CVE source labels at least one public reference as exploit material. BlackTree has not independently validated that it is safe, reliable or weaponised.

Likely attack path
a network path → DEPRECATED: Trusting Self-reported DNS Name → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-292 ↗

CWE-292: DEPRECATED: Trusting Self-reported DNS Name. This entry has been deprecated because it was a duplicate of CWE-350. All content has been transferred to CWE-350.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-292Public exploit reference
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1696SolarWinds Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in SolarWinds Platform ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, Daten zu manipulieren und vertrauliche Informationen preiszugeben.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1474Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Red Hat OpenShift ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder Daten zu manipulieren.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1213Red Hat Enterprise Linux: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein entfernter anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in verschiedenen Komponenten von Red Hat Enterprise Linux ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code auszuführen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240417Security Bulletin 17 Apr 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 17 Apr 2024, published on 17 April 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0538Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité VMware 35866 du 25 juin 2025 https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/35866 Bulletin de sécurité VMware 35867 du 25 juin 2025 https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/35867 Référence CVE CVE-2019-20916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20916 Référence CVE CVE-2021-3572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3572 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42969 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29483 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45288 Référence CVE CVE-2023-47248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47248 Référence CVE CVE-2023-48795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48795 Référence CVE CVE-2023-50447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50447 Référence CVE CVE-2024-0243 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0243 Référence CVE CVE-2024-11392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11392 Référence CVE CVE-2024-11393 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11393 Référence CVE CVE-2024-11394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0512Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ERecord?id=CVE-2021-37404 Référence CVE CVE-2022-25168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25168 Référence CVE CVE-2022-26612 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26612 Référence CVE CVE-2022-30635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30635 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3171 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3509 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3510 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42969 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29267 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29267 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29483 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39410 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39410 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39663 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39663 Référence CVE CVE-2023-42282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42282 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44981 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45178 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45288 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853 Référence CVE CVE-2023-50298 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0106Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2022-42004 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49003 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49003 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49016 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49016 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2454 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2455 Référence CVE CVE-2023-26136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26136 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28154 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29483 Référence CVE CVE-2023-37920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37920 Référence CVE CVE-2023-42282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42282 Référence CVE CVE-2023-50314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50314 Référence CVE CVE-2023-51714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51714 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52492 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52917 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52921 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0741Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Secure Analytics

cord?id=CVE-2022-2880 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3287 Référence CVE CVE-2022-39253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-39253 Référence CVE CVE-2022-41715 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41715 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48627 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48669 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25193 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29409 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29483 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2953 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31122 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31484 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3635 Référence CVE CVE-2023-38264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38264 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39318 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39318 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39319 Référence CVE CVE-2023-39321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0579Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2020-11022 Référence CVE CVE-2020-11023 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11023 Référence CVE CVE-2020-13936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13936 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15778 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15778 Référence CVE CVE-2020-23064 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-23064 Référence CVE CVE-2021-40153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-40153 Référence CVE CVE-2021-41072 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-41072 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3287 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25193 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29483 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31122 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31122 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31484 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31484 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3635 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3635 Référence CVE CVE-2023-43804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43804 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44483 Référence CVE CVE-2023-44487 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45802 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0385Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ecord?id=CVE-2023-23455 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2513 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25193 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25193 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2597 Référence CVE CVE-2023-26545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26545 Référence CVE CVE-2023-27043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27043 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28322 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28328 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28772 Référence CVE CVE-2023-29483 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29483 Référence CVE CVE-2023-30456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30456 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31084 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31084 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3138 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3138 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3141 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3141 Référence CVE CVE-2023-31436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31436 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3161 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3161 Référence CVE CVE-2023-3212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3212 Référence CVE CVE-2023-32324 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-029231Eventlet の eventlet 等複数ベンダの製品における信頼された自己申告の DNS 名に関する脆弱性

Eventlet の eventlet 等複数ベンダの製品には、信頼された自己申告の DNS 名に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 11 Apr 2024 · Last source change 4 Nov 2025, 17:12 UTC · CWE-292 · DEPRECATED: Trusting Self-reported DNS Name

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCISA ADP
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2024-1084
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    n/a · Fixed: No fixed version is explicitly recorded in the structured CVE data.
    After
    n/a · Fixed: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
  2. Remediation statusRemediation status changed from Awaiting fix to Patch available.
    Before
    Awaiting fix
    After
    Patch available
    Red Hat Product Security ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-29483 · cve.blacktree.nl