BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2023
CVE-2023-23383High confidence

Service Fabric Explorer Spoofing Vulnerability

Microsoft · Azure Service Fabric 9.0 for Linux

8.2HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 11.69% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Microsoft Azure Service Fabric 9.0 for Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-27483

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

Service Fabric Explorer Spoofing Vulnerability

What

Service Fabric Explorer Spoofing Vulnerability

Why

Attacker-controlled content can reach a browser as executable script without sufficient output encoding or sanitisation.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

Service Fabric Explorer Spoofing Vulnerability

Why

Attacker-controlled content can reach a browser as executable script without sufficient output encoding or sanitisation.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Changed: exploitation can affect a different security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-79 ↗

CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'). The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SChangedScope: The attack can affect a component governed by a different security authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-79
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20230315Security Bulletin 15 Mar 2023

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 15 Mar 2023, published on 15 March 2023. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-0233Multiples vulnérabilités dans Microsoft Azure

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été corrigées dans Microsoft Azure . Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une usurpation d'identité.

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-001383Azure Service Fabric におけるなりすまされる脆弱性

Azure Service Fabric には、Service Fabric Explorer に不備があるため、なりすまされる脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5951MS 7월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

4896 | Dynamics 365 Finance 스푸핑 취약성 | | .NET and Visual Studio | CVE-2023-24895 | .NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | | Windows SmartScreen | CVE-2023-24880 | Windows SmartScreen 보안 기능 우회 취약성 | | Microsoft PostScript Printer Driver | CVE-2023-24856 | Microsoft PostScript 및 PCL6 Class 프린터 드라이버 정보 공개 취약성 | | Windows Cryptographic Services | CVE-2023-23416 | Windows 암호화 서비스 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Azure | CVE-2023-23408 | Azure Apache Ambari 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2023-23398 | Microsoft Excel 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2023-23396 | Microsoft Excel 서비스 거부 취약성 | | Service Fabric | CVE-2023-23383 | Service Fabric Explorer 스푸핑 취약성 | | Visual Studio | CVE-2023-23381 | Visual Studio 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Visual Studio | CVE-2023-21815 | Visual Studio 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | .NET and Visual Studio | CVE-2023-21808 | .NET 및 Visual Studio 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Graphics Component | CVE-2023-21756 | Windows Win32k 권한 상승 취약성 | | Azure DevOps | CVE-2023-21569 | Azure DevOps Server 스푸핑 취약성 | | Azure DevOps | CVE-2023-21565 | Azure DevOps Server 스푸핑 취약성 | | Windows Netlogon | CVE-2023-21526 | Windows Netlogon 정보 유출 취약성 | | .NET Framework | CVE-2022-41089 | .NET Framework 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows Netlogon | CVE-2022-38023 | Netlogon RPC 권한 상승 취약성 | | Wi

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5936MS 6월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

nerability | | .NET and Visual Studio | CVE-2023-24895 | .NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2023-24892 | Microsoft Edge(Chromium 기반) Webview2 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Teams | CVE-2023-24881 | Microsoft Teams 정보 공개 취약성 | | Windows SmartScreen | CVE-2023-24880 | Windows SmartScreen 보안 기능 우회 취약성 | | Microsoft PostScript Printer Driver | CVE-2023-24858 | Microsoft PostScript 및 PCL6 Class 프린터 드라이버 정보 공개 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2023-23398 | Microsoft Excel 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2023-23396 | Microsoft Excel 서비스 거부 취약성 | | Service Fabric | CVE-2023-23383 | Service Fabric Explorer 스푸핑 취약성 | | SQL Server | CVE-2023-23375 | Microsoft ODBC 및 OLE DB 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Visual Studio Code | CVE-2023-21779 | Visual Studio Code 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Visio | CVE-2023-21738 | Microsoft Office Visio 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Azure DevOps | CVE-2023-21569 | Azure DevOps Server 스푸핑 취약성 | | Azure DevOps | CVE-2023-21565 | Azure DevOps Server 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Graphics Component | CVE-2022-41121 | Windows 그래픽 구성 요소 권한 상승 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2022-41104 | Microsoft Excel 보안 기능 우회 취약성 | | Windows Netlogon | CVE-2022-38023 | Netlogon RPC 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Kerberos | CVE-2022-37967 | Wi

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5917MS 5월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

m-based) | CVE-2023-2464 | Chromium: CVE-2023-2464 PictureInPicture에서 부적절한 구현 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2023-2463 | Chromium: CVE-2023-2463 전체 화면 모드에서 부적절한 구현 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2023-2462 | Chromium: CVE-2023-2462 Prompts에서 부적절한 구현 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2023-2460 | Chromium: CVE-2023-2460 Extensions에서 신뢰할 수 없는 입력에 대한 불충분한 유효성 검사 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2023-2459 | Chromium: CVE-2023-2459 Prompts에서 부적절한 구현 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2023-23398 | Microsoft Excel 스푸핑 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Excel | CVE-2023-23396 | Microsoft Excel 서비스 거부 취약성 | | Service Fabric | CVE-2023-23383 | Service Fabric Explorer 스푸핑 취약성 | | Azure Machine Learning | CVE-2023-23382 | Azure Machine Learning 컴퓨팅 인스턴스 정보 공개 취약성 | | Microsoft Defender for IoT | CVE-2023-23379 | IoT용 Microsoft Defender 권한 상승 취약성 | | Microsoft Dynamics | CVE-2023-21807 | Microsoft Dynamics 365(온-프레미스) 교차-사이트 스크립팅 취약성 | | Visual Studio Code | CVE-2023-21779 | Visual Studio Code 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Dynamics | CVE-2023-21778 | Microsoft Dynamics Unified Service Desk 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Visio | CVE-2023-21738 | Microsoft Office Visio 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows RPC API | CVE-2023-21727 | 원격 프로시저 호출 런타임 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Office Publisher | CVE

Official advisory ↗
KISA KrCERT/CC · Korean · KNVD-5884MS 3월 보안 위협에 따른 정기 보안 업데이트 권고

ime Subsystem (CSRSS) | CVE-2023-23394 | CSRSS(Client Server Run-Time Subsystem) 정보 공개 취약성 | | Windows Central Resource Manager | CVE-2023-23393 | Windows BrokerInfrastructure Service 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows HTTP Protocol Stack | CVE-2023-23392 | HTTP 프로토콜 스택 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Office for Android | CVE-2023-23391 | Android용 Office 스푸핑 취약성 | | Windows Defender | CVE-2023-23389 | Microsoft Defender 권한 상승 취약성 | | Microsoft Bluetooth Driver | CVE-2023-23388 | Windows Bluetooth 드라이버 권한 상승 취약성 | | Windows Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet (PPPoE) | CVE-2023-23385 | Windows PPPoE(Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet) 권한 상승 취약성 | | Service Fabric | CVE-2023-23383 | Service Fabric Explorer 스푸핑 취약성 | | Visual Studio | CVE-2023-22743 | GitHub: CVE-2023-22743 - Git for Windows Installer 권한 상승 취약성 | | Visual Studio | CVE-2023-22490 | GitHub: CVE-2023-22490 비로컬 전송을 통한 로컬 클론 기반 데이터 반출 | | Power BI | CVE-2023-21806 | Power BI 보고 서버 스푸핑 취약성 | | Windows MSHTML Platform | CVE-2023-21805 | Windows MSHTML 플랫폼 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Windows Remote Procedure Call | CVE-2023-21708 | 원격 프로시저 호출 런타임 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Exchange Server | CVE-2023-21707 | Microsoft Exchange Server 원격 코드 실행 취약성 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) | CVE-2023-1236 | Chromium: CVE-2023-1236 Internals에서 부적절한 구현 | | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 14 Mar 2023 · Last source change 1 Jan 2025, 00:47 UTC · CWE-79 · Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-27483
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceOther authority
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-23383 · cve.blacktree.nl