BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2023
CVE-2023-1972High confidence

A potential heap based buffer overflow was found in _bfd_elf_slurp_version_tables() in bfd/elf.c

Unknown · binutils

6.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.90% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict the affected network interface to trusted sources where business-safe.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Unknown binutils and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Alpine, Debian findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Alpine v3.23v3.23 · mainbinutilsVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.40-r10Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.22v3.22 · mainbinutilsVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.40-r10Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Alpine v3.21v3.21 · mainbinutilsVendor fix publishedAlpine records a security fix at this version. An absent entry does not mean the package is unaffected.2.40-r10Alpine Security Database ↗Source updated 3 Oct 2026
Debian trixietrixie · sourcebinutilsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.41-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcebinutilsAffected, no fix publishedDebian currently tracks this release as open.Not published in this feedDebian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcebinutilsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.41-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcebinutilsVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.2.41-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-24156

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A potential heap based buffer overflow was found in _bfd_elf_slurp_version_tables() in bfd/elf.c. This may lead to loss of availability.

What

A potential heap based buffer overflow was found in _bfd_elf_slurp_version_tables() in bfd/elf.c. This may lead to loss of availability.

Why

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

A potential heap based buffer overflow was found in _bfd_elf_slurp_version_tables() in bfd/elf.c. This may lead to loss of availability.

Why

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-119 ↗

CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-119
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0900binutils: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Denial of Service

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in binutils ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Zustand herbeizuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20230524Security Bulletin 24 May 2023

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 24 May 2023, published on 24 May 2023. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0798 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0799 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0800 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0801 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0802 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0803 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0803 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0804 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1579 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1916 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1972 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1999 Référence CVE CVE-2023-23916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23916 Référence CVE CVE-2023-24056 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24056 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25433 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25434 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25435 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25584 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans VMware Tanzu

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0054 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0288 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0288 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0433 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0512 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1127 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1127 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1170 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1170 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1175 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1264 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1579 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1972 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2222 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2222 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2609 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2609 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2610 Référence CVE CVE-2023-46246 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46246 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4734 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4734 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4735 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4735 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4738 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4738 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4751

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0337Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

ord?id=CVE-2019-12972 Référence CVE CVE-2019-16163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16163 Référence CVE CVE-2020-15250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15250 Référence CVE CVE-2020-35493 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35493 Référence CVE CVE-2020-35494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35494 Référence CVE CVE-2020-35495 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35495 Référence CVE CVE-2020-35496 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35496 Référence CVE CVE-2020-35507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35507 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1370 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1972 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25584 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25585 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25585 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25588 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25588 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45133 Référence CVE CVE-2023-51775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-51775 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52428 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52428 Référence CVE CVE-2024-0450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0450 Référence CVE CVE-2024-10041 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-010877GNU Project の GNU Binutils における境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性

GNU Project の GNU Binutils には、境界外書き込みに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
binutils: affected at least binutils 2.40
Fixed
An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 17 May 2023 · Last source change 22 Jan 2025, 19:45 UTC · CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-24156
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: affected product. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-1972 · cve.blacktree.nl