BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2023
CVE-2023-0687High confidence

A vulnerability was found in GNU C Library 2.38

GNU · C Library

Official source article: Siemens SSA-398330 ↗. Check the applicable product and release in the original source.

4.6MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Medium, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 1.09% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs GNU C Library and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
SSA-398330 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 18 · interimSiemens ProductCERTSSA-398330: Vulnerabilities in the additional GNU/Linux subsystem of the SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518(F)-4 PN/DP MFP >= V3.1.0 and < V3.1.5
5 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4AX00-1AC0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AB0)
  • SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP (6ES7518-4FX00-1AC0)
  • SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP (6AG1518-4AX00-4AC0)
Summary
A vulnerability was found in GNU C Library 2.38. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects the function __monstartup of the file gmon.c of the component Call Graph Monitor. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-220246 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The inputs that induce this vulnerability are basically addresses of the running application that is built with gmon enabled. It's basically trusted input or input that needs an actual security flaw to be compromised or controlled.
Remediation
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2023-12716

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 5 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

A vulnerability was found in GNU C Library 2.38. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects the function __monstartup of the file gmon.c of the component Call Graph Monitor. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-220246 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The inputs that induce this vulnerability are basically addresses of the running application that is built with gmon enabled. It's basically trusted input or input that needs an actual security flaw to be compromised or controlled.

What

A vulnerability was found in GNU C Library 2.38. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects the function __monstartup of the file gmon.c of the component Call Graph Monitor. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-220246 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The inputs that induce this vulnerability are basically addresses of the running application that is built with gmon enabled. It's basically trusted input or input that needs an actual security flaw to be compromised or controlled.

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

A vulnerability was found in GNU C Library 2.38. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects the function __monstartup of the file gmon.c of the component Call Graph Monitor. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. VDB-220246 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The inputs that induce this vulnerability are basically addresses of the running application that is built with gmon enabled. It's basically trusted input or input that needs an actual security flaw to be compromised or controlled.

Why

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-120 ↗

CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'). The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CLowConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ILowIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.ALowAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a limited loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
CWE-120
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2023-0295GNU libc: Schwachstelle ermöglicht nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in GNU libc ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20230208Security Bulletin 08 Feb 2023

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Feb 2023, published on 8 February 2023. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0218Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-48554 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49043 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49063 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49920 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50247 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50247 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50249 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50249 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50250 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50250 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50444 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50458 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0687 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0767 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0795 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0796 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0797 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0798 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0799 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0800 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0801 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0969Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0216 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0217 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0361 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0401 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0614 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0614 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0687 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0767 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0795 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0796 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0797 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0798 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0798 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0799 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0800 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0801 Ré

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49535 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49728 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0215 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0216 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0217 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0401 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0687 Référence CVE CVE-2023-20873 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20873 Référence CVE CVE-2023-20883 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-20883 Référence CVE CVE-2023-21836 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21836 Référence CVE CVE-2023-21840 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21840 Référence CVE CVE-2023-21863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21863 Référence CVE CVE-2023-21865 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21865 Référence CVE CVE-2023-21866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-21866 Référence CVE CVE-2023-21867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2023-AVI-1015Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits Siemens

org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48303 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48522 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48560 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0215 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0361 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0361 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0687 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1077 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1077 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1206 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1206 Référence CVE CVE-2023-23914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23914 Référence CVE CVE-2023-23915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23915 Référence CVE CVE-2023-23916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23916 Référence CVE CVE-2023-24329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24329 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25136 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25136 Référence CVE CVE-2023-25139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2023-003286GNU C Library における古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性

** 未確定 ** 本件は、脆弱性として確定していません。 GNU C Library には、古典的バッファオーバーフローの脆弱性が存在します。 ベンダは、本脆弱性に対して異議を唱えています。 詳細については、以下の NVD の Current Description を確認してください。 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0687

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Update to V3.1.5 or later version
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 6 Feb 2023 · Last source change 25 Nov 2024, 15:41 UTC · CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.1
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2023-12716
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Siemens ProductCERT
CWE sourceCNA
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    2.38 · Fixed: An authoritative update reference is available, but the fixed version is not recorded in the structured CVE fields. Check the linked vendor advisory for the applicable release.
    After
    2.38 · Fixed: Update to V3.1.5 or later version
    Siemens ProductCERT ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2023-0687 · cve.blacktree.nl