BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-50545High confidence

r6040: Fix kmemleak in probe and remove

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

9 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-32019

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: r6040: Fix kmemleak in probe and remove There is a memory leaks reported by kmemleak: unreferenced object 0xffff888116111000 (size 2048): comm "modprobe", pid 817, jiffies 4294759745 (age 76.502s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 c4 0a 04 81 88 ff ff 08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff ................ 08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff815bcd82>] kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x60 [<ffffffff827e20ee>] phy_device_create+0x4e/0x90 [<ffffffff827e6072>] get_phy_device+0xd2/0x220 [<ffffffff827e7844>] mdiobus_scan+0xa4/0x2e0 [<ffffffff827e8be2>] __mdiobus_register+0x482/0x8b0 [<ffffffffa01f5d24>] r6040_init_one+0x714/0xd2c [r6040] ... The problem occurs in probe process as follows: r6040_init_one: mdiobus_register mdiobus_scan <- alloc and register phy_device, the reference count of phy_device is 3 r6040_mii_probe phy_connect <- connect to the first phy_device, so the reference count of the first phy_device is 4, others are 3 register_netdev <- fault inject succeeded, goto error handling path // error handling path err_out_mdio_unregister: mdiobus_unregister(lp->mii_bus); err_out_mdio: mdiobus_free(lp->mii_bus); <- the reference count of the first phy_device is 1, it is not released and other phy_devices are released // similarly, the remove process also has the same problem The root cause is traced to the phy_device is not disconnected when removes one r6040 device in r6040_remove_one() or on error handling path after r6040_mii probed successfully. In r6040_mii_probe(), a net ethernet device is connected to the first PHY device of mii_bus, in order to notify the connected driver when the link status changes, which is the default behavior of the PHY infrastructure to handle everything. Therefore the phy_device should be disconnected when removes one r6040 device or on error handling path. Fix it by adding phy_disconnect() when removes one r6040 device or on error handling path after r6040_mii probed successfully.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: r6040: Fix kmemleak in probe and remove There is a memory leaks reported by kmemleak: unreferenced object 0xffff888116111000 (size 2048): comm "modprobe", pid 817, jiffies 4294759745 (age 76.502s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 c4 0a 04 81 88 ff ff 08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff ................ 08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff815bcd82>] kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x60 [<ffffffff827e20ee>] phy_device_create+0x4e/0x90 [<ffffffff827e6072>] get_phy_device+0xd2/0x220 [<ffffffff827e7844>] mdiobus_scan+0xa4/0x2e0 [<ffffffff827e8be2>] __mdiobus_register+0x482/0x8b0 [<ffffffffa01f5d24>] r6040_init_one+0x714/0xd2c [r6040] ... The problem occurs in probe process as follows: r6040_init_one: mdiobus_register mdiobus_scan <- alloc and register phy_device, the reference count of phy_device is 3 r6040_mii_probe phy_connect <- connect to the first phy_device, so the reference count of the first phy_device is 4, others are 3 register_netdev <- fault inject succeeded, goto error handling path // error handling path err_out_mdio_unregister: mdiobus_unregister(lp->mii_bus); err_out_mdio: mdiobus_free(lp->mii_bus); <- the reference count of the first phy_device is 1, it is not released and other phy_devices are released // similarly, the remove process also has the same problem The root cause is traced to the phy_device is not disconnected when removes one r6040 device in r6040_remove_one() or on error handling path after r6040_mii probed successfully. In r6040_mii_probe(), a net ethernet device is connected to the first PHY device of mii_bus, in order to notify the connected driver when the link status changes, which is the default behavior of the PHY infrastructure to handle everything. Therefore the phy_device should be disconnected when removes one r6040 device or on error handling path. Fix it by adding phy_disconnect() when removes one r6040 device or on error handling path after r6040_mii probed successfully.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: r6040: Fix kmemleak in probe and remove There is a memory leaks reported by kmemleak: unreferenced object 0xffff888116111000 (size 2048): comm "modprobe", pid 817, jiffies 4294759745 (age 76.502s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 c4 0a 04 81 88 ff ff 08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff ................ 08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff815bcd82>] kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x60 [<ffffffff827e20ee>] phy_device_create+0x4e/0x90 [<ffffffff827e6072>] get_phy_device+0xd2/0x220 [<ffffffff827e7844>] mdiobus_scan+0xa4/0x2e0 [<ffffffff827e8be2>] __mdiobus_register+0x482/0x8b0 [<ffffffffa01f5d24>] r6040_init_one+0x714/0xd2c [r6040] ... The problem occurs in probe process as follows: r6040_init_one: mdiobus_register mdiobus_scan <- alloc and register phy_device, the reference count of phy_device is 3 r6040_mii_probe phy_connect <- connect to the first phy_device, so the reference count of the first phy_device is 4, others are 3 register_netdev <- fault inject succeeded, goto error handling path // error handling path err_out_mdio_unregister: mdiobus_unregister(lp->mii_bus); err_out_mdio: mdiobus_free(lp->mii_bus); <- the reference count of the first phy_device is 1, it is not released and other phy_devices are released // similarly, the remove process also has the same problem The root cause is traced to the phy_device is not disconnected when removes one r6040 device in r6040_remove_one() or on error handling path after r6040_mii probed successfully. In r6040_mii_probe(), a net ethernet device is connected to the first PHY device of mii_bus, in order to notify the connected driver when the link status changes, which is the default behavior of the PHY infrastructure to handle everything. Therefore the phy_device should be disconnected when removes one r6040 device or on error handling path. Fix it by adding phy_disconnect() when removes one r6040 device or on error handling path after r6040_mii probed successfully.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2026-0349Dell Avamar und NetWorker: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell Avamar und Dell NetWorker ausnutzen, um Angriffe zu starten, die die Integrität, Vertraulichkeit und Verfügbarkeit von Systemen beeinträchtigen.

Official advisory ↗
BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2229Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und andere nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251008Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025, published on 8 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1140Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

USE-SU-2025:4517-1 du 23 décembre 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20254517-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:4521-1 du 24 décembre 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20254521-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50253 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50253 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50280 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50364 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50364 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50368 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50368 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50494 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50494 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50545 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50551 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50569 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50578 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53229 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53369 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53369 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53431 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53542 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1073Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50530 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50532 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50534 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50534 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50535 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50537 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50541 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50542 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50543 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50544 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50545 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50546 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50549 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50551 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50553 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50556 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50559 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50560 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1032Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50530 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50532 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50534 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50534 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50535 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50537 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50537 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50541 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50541 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50542 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50542 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50543 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50543 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50544 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50544 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50545 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50546 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50549 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50551 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50553 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50553 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50556 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50559 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50560 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50561 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-025812LinuxのLinux Kernelにおける有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、以下の脆弱性が修正されました。r6040のprobeおよびremoveにおけるkmemleakの問題を修正しました。kmemleakによって、参照されていないオブジェクト0xffff888116111000(サイズ2048)のメモリリークが報告されています。問題はprobeプロセスで発生しており、具体的にはr6040_init_one内でmdiobus_registerにてmdiobus_scanがphy_deviceの割り当てと登録を行い、その参照カウントが3になります。r6040_mii_probeではphy_connectが最初のphy_deviceに接続し、そのため最初のphy_deviceの参照カウントは4となり、他のphy_deviceの参照カウントは3のままです。register_netdevで障害が注入され、エラーハンドリングパスへ遷移します。エラーハンドリングパス内のmdiobus_free呼び出し時に、最初のphy_deviceの参照カウントが1のまま解放されず、他のphy_deviceは解放される問題がありました。removeプロセスも同様の問題を抱えています。根本原因はr6040_remove_one()やr6040_mii_probe成功後のエラーハンドリングパスでphy_deviceが切断されないことにあります。r6040_mii_probeでは、リンク状態変化を接続ドライバに通知するため、mii_busの最初のPHYデバイスにネットワークイーサネットデバイスが接続されています。これはPHYインフラの標準的な挙動です。したがって、r6040デバイスの削除時またはエラーハンドリングパスでphy_deviceは切断される必要があります。この問題を修正するために、r6040_mii_probe成功後のr6040デバイス削除時およびエラーハンドリングパスにphy_disconnect()を追加しました。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 3831861b4ad8fd0ad7110048eb3e155628799d2b < a04707f4596952049da05756c27398c34d9a1d36, 3831861b4ad8fd0ad7110048eb3e155628799d2b < b4448816e6a565e08236a6009c6bf48c6836cdfd, 3831861b4ad8fd0ad7110048eb3e155628799d2b < 2ce242e1b9ad31c1f68496b3548e407a8cb2c07d, 3831861b4ad8fd0ad7110048eb3e155628799d2b < b0a61359026b57a287a48fbb4ba1d097023eca3e, 3831861b4ad8fd0ad7110048eb3e155628799d2b < 3d5f83a62e8235d235534b3dc6f197d8a822c269, 3831861b4ad8fd0ad7110048eb3e155628799d2b < 9b5b50329e2e966831a7237dd6949e7b5362a49a, 3831861b4ad8fd0ad7110048eb3e155628799d2b < ad2c8f25457ca9a81e7e958148cbc26600ce3071, 3831861b4ad8fd0ad7110048eb3e155628799d2b < 5944c25c67de54e0aa53623e1e1af3bf8b16ed44, 3831861b4ad8fd0ad7110048eb3e155628799d2b < 7e43039a49c2da45edc1d9d7c9ede4003ab45a5f, 2.6.36
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.36, 4.9.337 ≤ 4.9.*, 4.14.303 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.270 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.229 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.163 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.86 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.0.16 ≤ 6.0.*, 6.1.2 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.2 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 7 Oct 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:21 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32019
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-50545 · cve.blacktree.nl