BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-50453High confidence

gpiolib: cdev: fix NULL-pointer dereferences

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.16% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

13 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 9 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-azure-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-gcp-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-intelAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-lowlatency-hwe-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-oem-6.11Affected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-32849

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 9 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gpiolib: cdev: fix NULL-pointer dereferences There are several places where we can crash the kernel by requesting lines, unbinding the GPIO device, then calling any of the system calls relevant to the GPIO character device's annonymous file descriptors: ioctl(), read(), poll(). While I observed it with the GPIO simulator, it will also happen for any of the GPIO devices that can be hot-unplugged - for instance any HID GPIO expander (e.g. CP2112). This affects both v1 and v2 uAPI. This fixes it partially by checking if gdev->chip is not NULL but it doesn't entirely remedy the situation as we still have a race condition in which another thread can remove the device after the check.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gpiolib: cdev: fix NULL-pointer dereferences There are several places where we can crash the kernel by requesting lines, unbinding the GPIO device, then calling any of the system calls relevant to the GPIO character device's annonymous file descriptors: ioctl(), read(), poll(). While I observed it with the GPIO simulator, it will also happen for any of the GPIO devices that can be hot-unplugged - for instance any HID GPIO expander (e.g. CP2112). This affects both v1 and v2 uAPI. This fixes it partially by checking if gdev->chip is not NULL but it doesn't entirely remedy the situation as we still have a race condition in which another thread can remove the device after the check.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gpiolib: cdev: fix NULL-pointer dereferences There are several places where we can crash the kernel by requesting lines, unbinding the GPIO device, then calling any of the system calls relevant to the GPIO character device's annonymous file descriptors: ioctl(), read(), poll(). While I observed it with the GPIO simulator, it will also happen for any of the GPIO devices that can be hot-unplugged - for instance any HID GPIO expander (e.g. CP2112). This affects both v1 and v2 uAPI. This fixes it partially by checking if gdev->chip is not NULL but it doesn't entirely remedy the situation as we still have a race condition in which another thread can remove the device after the check.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
Denial of serviceCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-2187Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen und um nicht nähere beschriebene Effekte zu verursachen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20251008Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 08 Oct 2025, published on 8 October 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0369Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

suse-su-20261078-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:1081-1 du 26 mars 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261081-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:1083-1 du 26 mars 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261083-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:1088-1 du 26 mars 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261088-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2026:1089-1 du 26 mars 2026 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20261089-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50423 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50423 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50453 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50697 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50697 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50756 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50756 Référence CVE CVE-2023-42752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42752 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53257 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53714 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53714 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53743 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53743 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53750 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53750 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0921Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50435 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50436 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50437 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50439 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50440 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50443 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50444 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50449 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50453 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50454 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50456 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50458 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50459 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50460 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50465 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50466 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50467 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0895Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50437 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50439 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50439 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50440 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50441 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50443 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50444 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50444 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50447 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50449 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50449 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50452 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50452 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50453 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50453 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50454 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50454 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50456 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50456 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50458 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50458 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50459 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50459 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50460 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50460 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50464 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50465 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50466 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2025-024865LinuxのLinux KernelにおけるNULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linuxカーネルにおいて、次の脆弱性が修正されました:gpiolib: cdevのNULLポインタ参照を修正しました。GPIOデバイスのラインを要求し、その後にGPIOデバイスのバインドを解除してから、GPIOキャラクタデバイスの匿名ファイルディスクリプタに関連するシステムコール(ioctl()、read()、poll())を呼び出すと、カーネルがクラッシュする問題が複数存在します。これはGPIOシミュレータで確認されましたが、ホットアンプラグ可能な任意のGPIOデバイス(例えばCP2112のようなHID GPIOエキスパンダー)でも同様の問題が発生します。この脆弱性はv1およびv2のuAPIの両方に影響を与えます。修正はgdev->chipがNULLでないことを確認することで部分的に対応されていますが、チェック後に別スレッドがデバイスを削除する競合状態が依然として存在するため、完全な対策とはなっていません。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: d7c51b47ac11e66f547b55640405c1c474642d72 < 6d79546622baab843172b52c3af035f83c1b21df, d7c51b47ac11e66f547b55640405c1c474642d72 < 7c755a2d6df511eeb5afba966ac28140f9ea5063, d7c51b47ac11e66f547b55640405c1c474642d72 < d66f68ac9e7ba46b6b90fbe25155723f2126088a, d7c51b47ac11e66f547b55640405c1c474642d72 < ac6ce3cd7a3e10a2e37b8970bab81b4d33d5cfc3, d7c51b47ac11e66f547b55640405c1c474642d72 < 533aae7c94dbc2b14301cfd68ae7e0e90f0c8438, 4.8
Fixed
Linux: < 4.8, 5.10.163 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.86 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.0.16 ≤ 6.0.*, 6.1.2 ≤ 6.1.*, 6.2 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 Oct 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:19 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-32849
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-50453 · cve.blacktree.nl