BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-50100High confidence

sched/core: Do not requeue task on CPU excluded from cpus_mask

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

3 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-55366

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/core: Do not requeue task on CPU excluded from cpus_mask The following warning was triggered on a large machine early in boot on a distribution kernel but the same problem should also affect mainline. WARNING: CPU: 439 PID: 10 at ../kernel/workqueue.c:2231 process_one_work+0x4d/0x440 Call Trace: <TASK> rescuer_thread+0x1f6/0x360 kthread+0x156/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK> Commit c6e7bd7afaeb ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu") optimises ttwu by queueing a task that is descheduling on the wakelist, but does not check if the task descheduling is still allowed to run on that CPU. In this warning, the problematic task is a workqueue rescue thread which checks if the rescue is for a per-cpu workqueue and running on the wrong CPU. While this is early in boot and it should be possible to create workers, the rescue thread may still used if the MAYDAY_INITIAL_TIMEOUT is reached or MAYDAY_INTERVAL and on a sufficiently large machine, the rescue thread is being used frequently. Tracing confirmed that the task should have migrated properly using the stopper thread to handle the migration. However, a parallel wakeup from udev running on another CPU that does not share CPU cache observes p->on_cpu and uses task_cpu(p), queues the task on the old CPU and triggers the warning. Check that the wakee task that is descheduling is still allowed to run on its current CPU and if not, wait for the descheduling to complete and select an allowed CPU.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/core: Do not requeue task on CPU excluded from cpus_mask The following warning was triggered on a large machine early in boot on a distribution kernel but the same problem should also affect mainline. WARNING: CPU: 439 PID: 10 at ../kernel/workqueue.c:2231 process_one_work+0x4d/0x440 Call Trace: <TASK> rescuer_thread+0x1f6/0x360 kthread+0x156/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK> Commit c6e7bd7afaeb ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu") optimises ttwu by queueing a task that is descheduling on the wakelist, but does not check if the task descheduling is still allowed to run on that CPU. In this warning, the problematic task is a workqueue rescue thread which checks if the rescue is for a per-cpu workqueue and running on the wrong CPU. While this is early in boot and it should be possible to create workers, the rescue thread may still used if the MAYDAY_INITIAL_TIMEOUT is reached or MAYDAY_INTERVAL and on a sufficiently large machine, the rescue thread is being used frequently. Tracing confirmed that the task should have migrated properly using the stopper thread to handle the migration. However, a parallel wakeup from udev running on another CPU that does not share CPU cache observes p->on_cpu and uses task_cpu(p), queues the task on the old CPU and triggers the warning. Check that the wakee task that is descheduling is still allowed to run on its current CPU and if not, wait for the descheduling to complete and select an allowed CPU.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/core: Do not requeue task on CPU excluded from cpus_mask The following warning was triggered on a large machine early in boot on a distribution kernel but the same problem should also affect mainline. WARNING: CPU: 439 PID: 10 at ../kernel/workqueue.c:2231 process_one_work+0x4d/0x440 Call Trace: <TASK> rescuer_thread+0x1f6/0x360 kthread+0x156/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK> Commit c6e7bd7afaeb ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu") optimises ttwu by queueing a task that is descheduling on the wakelist, but does not check if the task descheduling is still allowed to run on that CPU. In this warning, the problematic task is a workqueue rescue thread which checks if the rescue is for a per-cpu workqueue and running on the wrong CPU. While this is early in boot and it should be possible to create workers, the rescue thread may still used if the MAYDAY_INITIAL_TIMEOUT is reached or MAYDAY_INTERVAL and on a sufficiently large machine, the rescue thread is being used frequently. Tracing confirmed that the task should have migrated properly using the stopper thread to handle the migration. However, a parallel wakeup from udev running on another CPU that does not share CPU cache observes p->on_cpu and uses task_cpu(p), queues the task on the old CPU and triggers the warning. Check that the wakee task that is descheduling is still allowed to run on its current CPU and if not, wait for the descheduling to complete and select an allowed CPU.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-1350Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50092 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50093 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50094 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50097 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50098 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50100 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50101 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50102 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50103 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50104 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50108 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50109 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50086 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50092 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50093 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50094 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50097 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50098 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50100 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50101 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50102 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50103 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50104 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50108 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50109 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50085 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50092 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50093 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50094 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50097 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50098 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50100 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50101 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50102 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50103 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50104 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50108 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50109 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50091 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50091 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50092 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50093 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50094 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50097 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50098 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50100 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50101 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50102 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50103 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50104 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50108 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50109 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-50086 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50092 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50092 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50093 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50093 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50094 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50097 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50098 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50098 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50099 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50099 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50100 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50100 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50101 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50101 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50102 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50103 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50103 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50104 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50104 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50108 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50108 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50109 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50109 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
c6e7bd7afaeb3af55ffac122828035f1c01d1d7b < 748d2e9585ae53cb6be48e84f93d2f082ae1d135; c6e7bd7afaeb3af55ffac122828035f1c01d1d7b < fde45283f4c8a91c367ea5f20f87036468755121; c6e7bd7afaeb3af55ffac122828035f1c01d1d7b < 302f7b0fc337746f41c69eb08522907f6a90c643; c6e7bd7afaeb3af55ffac122828035f1c01d1d7b < 751d4cbc43879229dbc124afefe240b70fd29a85; 5.8
Fixed
< 5.8; 5.15.61 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.18.18 ≤ 5.18.*; 5.19.2 ≤ 5.19.*; 6.0 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Jun 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:12 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-55366
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-50100 · cve.blacktree.nl