BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-50070High confidence

mptcp: do not queue data on closed subflows

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.26% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 3 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.19.6-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-55216

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: do not queue data on closed subflows Dipanjan reported a syzbot splat at close time: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10818 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153 inet_sock_destruct+0x6d0/0x8e0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153 Modules linked in: uio_ivshmem(OE) uio(E) CPU: 1 PID: 10818 Comm: kworker/1:16 Tainted: G OE 5.19.0-rc6-g2eae0556bb9d #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x6d0/0x8e0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153 Code: 21 02 00 00 41 8b 9c 24 28 02 00 00 e9 07 ff ff ff e8 34 4d 91 f9 89 ee 4c 89 e7 e8 4a 47 60 ff e9 a6 fc ff ff e8 20 4d 91 f9 <0f> 0b e9 84 fe ff ff e8 14 4d 91 f9 0f 0b e9 d4 fd ff ff e8 08 4d RSP: 0018:ffffc9001b35fa78 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000002879d0 RCX: ffff8881326f3b00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8881326f3b00 RDI: 0000000000000002 RBP: ffff888179662674 R08: ffffffff87e983a0 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 00000000000004ea R12: ffff888179662400 R13: ffff888179662428 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88817e38e258 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f5f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020007bc0 CR3: 0000000179592000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> __sk_destruct+0x4f/0x8e0 net/core/sock.c:2067 sk_destruct+0xbd/0xe0 net/core/sock.c:2112 __sk_free+0xef/0x3d0 net/core/sock.c:2123 sk_free+0x78/0xa0 net/core/sock.c:2134 sock_put include/net/sock.h:1927 [inline] __mptcp_close_ssk+0x50f/0x780 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2351 __mptcp_destroy_sock+0x332/0x760 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2828 mptcp_worker+0x5d2/0xc90 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2586 process_one_work+0x9cc/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0x623/0x1070 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:302 </TASK> The root cause of the problem is that an mptcp-level (re)transmit can race with mptcp_close() and the packet scheduler checks the subflow state before acquiring the socket lock: we can try to (re)transmit on an already closed ssk. Fix the issue checking again the subflow socket status under the subflow socket lock protection. Additionally add the missing check for the fallback-to-tcp case.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: do not queue data on closed subflows Dipanjan reported a syzbot splat at close time: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10818 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153 inet_sock_destruct+0x6d0/0x8e0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153 Modules linked in: uio_ivshmem(OE) uio(E) CPU: 1 PID: 10818 Comm: kworker/1:16 Tainted: G OE 5.19.0-rc6-g2eae0556bb9d #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x6d0/0x8e0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153 Code: 21 02 00 00 41 8b 9c 24 28 02 00 00 e9 07 ff ff ff e8 34 4d 91 f9 89 ee 4c 89 e7 e8 4a 47 60 ff e9 a6 fc ff ff e8 20 4d 91 f9 <0f> 0b e9 84 fe ff ff e8 14 4d 91 f9 0f 0b e9 d4 fd ff ff e8 08 4d RSP: 0018:ffffc9001b35fa78 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000002879d0 RCX: ffff8881326f3b00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8881326f3b00 RDI: 0000000000000002 RBP: ffff888179662674 R08: ffffffff87e983a0 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 00000000000004ea R12: ffff888179662400 R13: ffff888179662428 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88817e38e258 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f5f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020007bc0 CR3: 0000000179592000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> __sk_destruct+0x4f/0x8e0 net/core/sock.c:2067 sk_destruct+0xbd/0xe0 net/core/sock.c:2112 __sk_free+0xef/0x3d0 net/core/sock.c:2123 sk_free+0x78/0xa0 net/core/sock.c:2134 sock_put include/net/sock.h:1927 [inline] __mptcp_close_ssk+0x50f/0x780 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2351 __mptcp_destroy_sock+0x332/0x760 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2828 mptcp_worker+0x5d2/0xc90 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2586 process_one_work+0x9cc/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0x623/0x1070 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:302 </TASK> The root cause of the problem is that an mptcp-level (re)transmit can race with mptcp_close() and the packet scheduler checks the subflow state before acquiring the socket lock: we can try to (re)transmit on an already closed ssk. Fix the issue checking again the subflow socket status under the subflow socket lock protection. Additionally add the missing check for the fallback-to-tcp case.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: do not queue data on closed subflows Dipanjan reported a syzbot splat at close time: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10818 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153 inet_sock_destruct+0x6d0/0x8e0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153 Modules linked in: uio_ivshmem(OE) uio(E) CPU: 1 PID: 10818 Comm: kworker/1:16 Tainted: G OE 5.19.0-rc6-g2eae0556bb9d #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x6d0/0x8e0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153 Code: 21 02 00 00 41 8b 9c 24 28 02 00 00 e9 07 ff ff ff e8 34 4d 91 f9 89 ee 4c 89 e7 e8 4a 47 60 ff e9 a6 fc ff ff e8 20 4d 91 f9 <0f> 0b e9 84 fe ff ff e8 14 4d 91 f9 0f 0b e9 d4 fd ff ff e8 08 4d RSP: 0018:ffffc9001b35fa78 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000002879d0 RCX: ffff8881326f3b00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8881326f3b00 RDI: 0000000000000002 RBP: ffff888179662674 R08: ffffffff87e983a0 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 00000000000004ea R12: ffff888179662400 R13: ffff888179662428 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88817e38e258 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f5f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020007bc0 CR3: 0000000179592000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> __sk_destruct+0x4f/0x8e0 net/core/sock.c:2067 sk_destruct+0xbd/0xe0 net/core/sock.c:2112 __sk_free+0xef/0x3d0 net/core/sock.c:2123 sk_free+0x78/0xa0 net/core/sock.c:2134 sock_put include/net/sock.h:1927 [inline] __mptcp_close_ssk+0x50f/0x780 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2351 __mptcp_destroy_sock+0x332/0x760 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2828 mptcp_worker+0x5d2/0xc90 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2586 process_one_work+0x9cc/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:2289 worker_thread+0x623/0x1070 kernel/workqueue.c:2436 kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:302 </TASK> The root cause of the problem is that an mptcp-level (re)transmit can race with mptcp_close() and the packet scheduler checks the subflow state before acquiring the socket lock: we can try to (re)transmit on an already closed ssk. Fix the issue checking again the subflow socket status under the subflow socket lock protection. Additionally add the missing check for the fallback-to-tcp case.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1350Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250625Security Bulletin 25 Jun 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 25 Jun 2025, published on 25 June 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1135Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

é Ubuntu USN-7938-1 du 16 décembre 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7938-1 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7939-1 du 16 décembre 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7939-1 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7939-2 du 16 décembre 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7939-2 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7940-1 du 17 décembre 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7940-1 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47385 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49026 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49390 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50070 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50327 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52574 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52574 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52593 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52593 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52650 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52935 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1074Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

curité Red Hat RHSA-2025:22405 du 01 décembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:22405 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:22661 du 03 décembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:22661 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:22752 du 04 décembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:22752 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50050 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50070 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50211 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50229 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50356 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50367 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50386 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1075Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

é Ubuntu USN-7889-5 du 05 décembre 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7889-5 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7906-2 du 05 décembre 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7906-2 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7909-4 du 05 décembre 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7909-4 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7910-2 du 05 décembre 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7910-2 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47385 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49026 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49390 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50070 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50327 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52854 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52935 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52975 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53074 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35867 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36331 Référence CVE CVE-2024-49935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0978Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19440 du 03 novembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19440 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19447 du 03 novembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19447 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19469 du 03 novembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19469 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19492 du 03 novembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19492 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19886 du 06 novembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19886 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50050 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50070 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50137 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50367 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53178 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53226 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53226 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53257 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0950Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

in de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19104 du 27 octobre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19104 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19222 du 29 octobre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19222 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19223 du 29 octobre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19223 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19224 du 29 octobre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19224 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:19268 du 29 octobre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:19268 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50050 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50070 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50137 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50386 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53297 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53305 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53373 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-026875Linux の Linux Kernel における脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、不特定の脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: d5f49190def61c47b2faff170ba8fbc48bac4371 < fb9c73ef2ac2ec816efdc8b9267bc04e1369c20b, d5f49190def61c47b2faff170ba8fbc48bac4371 < 8caf5c15b5288d52d9c89374d6c10fa32ee84ec5, d5f49190def61c47b2faff170ba8fbc48bac4371 < c886d70286bf3ad411eb3d689328a67f7102c6ae, 5.10
Fixed
Linux: < 5.10, 5.15.190 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.19.4 ≤ 5.19.*, 6.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Jun 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-55216
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-50070 · cve.blacktree.nl