BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49985High confidence

bpf: Don't use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

3 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-55264

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Don't use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors Hsin-Wei reported a KASAN splat triggered by their BPF runtime fuzzer which is based on a customized syzkaller: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004e90b58 by task syz-executor.0/1489 CPU: 1 PID: 1489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xc9 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1f0 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 kasan_report.cold+0xeb/0x197 ? kvmalloc_node+0x170/0x200 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 ? arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher+0xd0/0xd0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x70 bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x3e8/0x640 ? bpf_obj_name_cpy+0x149/0x1b0 bpf_prog_load+0x102f/0x2220 ? __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x220/0x220 ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 ? __might_fault+0xd6/0x180 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa6/0x120 ? __might_fault+0x147/0x180 __sys_bpf+0x137b/0x6070 ? bpf_perf_link_attach+0x530/0x530 ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600 ? __fget_files+0x255/0x450 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? fput+0x30/0x1a0 ? ksys_write+0x1a8/0x260 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7a/0xc0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f917c4e2c2d The problem here is that a range of tnum_range(0, map->max_entries - 1) has limited ability to represent the concrete tight range with the tnum as the set of resulting states from value + mask can result in a superset of the actual intended range, and as such a tnum_in(range, reg->var_off) check may yield true when it shouldn't, for example tnum_range(0, 2) would result in 00XX -> v = 0000, m = 0011 such that the intended set of {0, 1, 2} is here represented by a less precise superset of {0, 1, 2, 3}. As the register is known const scalar, really just use the concrete reg->var_off.value for the upper index check.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Don't use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors Hsin-Wei reported a KASAN splat triggered by their BPF runtime fuzzer which is based on a customized syzkaller: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004e90b58 by task syz-executor.0/1489 CPU: 1 PID: 1489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xc9 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1f0 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 kasan_report.cold+0xeb/0x197 ? kvmalloc_node+0x170/0x200 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 ? arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher+0xd0/0xd0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x70 bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x3e8/0x640 ? bpf_obj_name_cpy+0x149/0x1b0 bpf_prog_load+0x102f/0x2220 ? __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x220/0x220 ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 ? __might_fault+0xd6/0x180 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa6/0x120 ? __might_fault+0x147/0x180 __sys_bpf+0x137b/0x6070 ? bpf_perf_link_attach+0x530/0x530 ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600 ? __fget_files+0x255/0x450 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? fput+0x30/0x1a0 ? ksys_write+0x1a8/0x260 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7a/0xc0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f917c4e2c2d The problem here is that a range of tnum_range(0, map->max_entries - 1) has limited ability to represent the concrete tight range with the tnum as the set of resulting states from value + mask can result in a superset of the actual intended range, and as such a tnum_in(range, reg->var_off) check may yield true when it shouldn't, for example tnum_range(0, 2) would result in 00XX -> v = 0000, m = 0011 such that the intended set of {0, 1, 2} is here represented by a less precise superset of {0, 1, 2, 3}. As the register is known const scalar, really just use the concrete reg->var_off.value for the upper index check.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Don't use tnum_range on array range checking for poke descriptors Hsin-Wei reported a KASAN splat triggered by their BPF runtime fuzzer which is based on a customized syzkaller: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888004e90b58 by task syz-executor.0/1489 CPU: 1 PID: 1489 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xc9 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x1f0 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 kasan_report.cold+0xeb/0x197 ? kvmalloc_node+0x170/0x200 ? bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 bpf_int_jit_compile+0x1257/0x13f0 ? arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher+0xd0/0xd0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x43/0x70 bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x3e8/0x640 ? bpf_obj_name_cpy+0x149/0x1b0 bpf_prog_load+0x102f/0x2220 ? __bpf_prog_put.constprop.0+0x220/0x220 ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110 ? __might_fault+0xd6/0x180 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa6/0x120 ? __might_fault+0x147/0x180 __sys_bpf+0x137b/0x6070 ? bpf_perf_link_attach+0x530/0x530 ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600 ? __fget_files+0x255/0x450 ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? fput+0x30/0x1a0 ? ksys_write+0x1a8/0x260 __x64_sys_bpf+0x7a/0xc0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x21/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f917c4e2c2d The problem here is that a range of tnum_range(0, map->max_entries - 1) has limited ability to represent the concrete tight range with the tnum as the set of resulting states from value + mask can result in a superset of the actual intended range, and as such a tnum_in(range, reg->var_off) check may yield true when it shouldn't, for example tnum_range(0, 2) would result in 00XX -> v = 0000, m = 0011 such that the intended set of {0, 1, 2} is here represented by a less precise superset of {0, 1, 2, 3}. As the register is known const scalar, really just use the concrete reg->var_off.value for the upper index check.

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-1350Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0370Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0162Multiples vulnérabilités dans Juniper Networks Secure Analytics

e provoquer une élévation de privilèges, un déni de service à distance et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données. Solutions Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation). Documentation Bulletin de sécurité Juniper Networks On-Demand-JSA-Series-Multiple-vulnerabilities-resolved-in-Juniper-Secure-Analytics-in-7-5-0-UP14-IF01 du 12 février 2026 https://supportportal.juniper.net/s/article/On-Demand-JSA-Series-Multiple-vulnerabilities-resolved-in-Juniper-Secure-Analytics-in-7-5-0-UP14-IF01 Référence CVE CVE-2020-16971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-16971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53373 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47252 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47252 Référence CVE CVE-2024-47619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47619 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22026 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026 Référence CVE CVE-2025-23048 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23048 Référence CVE CVE-2025-32988 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49982 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49983 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49984 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49986 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49987 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49989 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49990 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49993 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49995 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49999 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1074Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

om/errata/RHSA-2025:22388 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:22392 du 01 décembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:22392 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:22405 du 01 décembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:22405 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:22661 du 03 décembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:22661 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:22752 du 04 décembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:22752 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48701 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50050 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50050 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50070 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50211 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50229 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50356 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50367 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1013Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBM

IBM 7251173 du 13 novembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7251173 Bulletin de sécurité IBM 7250474 du 26 novembre 2025 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7250474 Référence CVE CVE-2020-16971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-16971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-31197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-31197 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3171 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3509 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3510 Référence CVE CVE-2022-41946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41946 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1370 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1370 Référence CVE CVE-2023-26133 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26133 Référence CVE CVE-2023-45287 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45287 Référence CVE CVE-2023-46308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46308 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53373 Référence CVE CVE-2024-1597 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49972 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49982 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49983 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49984 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49986 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49987 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49989 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49990 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49993 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49995 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49999 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0893Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

at.com/errata/RHSA-2025:17812 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:17958 du 14 octobre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:17958 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:18043 du 15 octobre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:18043 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:18054 du 15 octobre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:18054 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:18098 du 15 octobre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:18098 Référence CVE CVE-2021-22555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22555 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50087 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50087 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50229 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53125 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53125 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53186 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53186 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53305 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53305 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53373 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53373 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0858Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de service à distance, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0788Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de Red Hat

tembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15660 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:15661 du 11 septembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15661 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:15662 du 11 septembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15662 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:15668 du 11 septembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15668 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:15669 du 11 septembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15669 Bulletin de sécurité Red Hat RHSA-2025:15670 du 11 septembre 2025 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:15670 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50000 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50000 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50211 Référence CVE CVE-2023-2513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2513 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42094 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42094 Référence CVE CVE-2024-50102 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50102 Référence CVE CVE-2025-21759 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22058 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22058 Référence CVE CVE-2025-22097 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49982 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49983 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49984 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49986 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49987 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49989 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49990 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49993 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49995 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49999 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50005 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49972 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49982 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49983 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49984 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49986 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49987 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49989 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49990 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49993 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49995 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49999 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49972 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49982 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49983 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49984 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49985 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49986 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49986 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49987 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49987 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49989 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49990 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49993 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49993 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49995 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49995 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49999 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49999 Référence CVE CVE-2022-50002 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
d2e4c1e6c2947269346054ac8937ccfe9e0bcc6b < e8979807178434db8ceaa84dfcd44363e71e50bb; d2e4c1e6c2947269346054ac8937ccfe9e0bcc6b < 4f672112f8665102a5842c170be1713f8ff95919; d2e4c1e6c2947269346054ac8937ccfe9e0bcc6b < a36df92c7ff7ecde2fb362241d0ab024dddd0597; d2e4c1e6c2947269346054ac8937ccfe9e0bcc6b < a657182a5c5150cdfacb6640aad1d2712571a409; 5.5
Fixed
< 5.5; 5.10.140 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.64 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.19.6 ≤ 5.19.*; 6.0 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Jun 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-55264
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49985 · cve.blacktree.nl