BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49968High confidence

ieee802154/adf7242: defer destroy_workqueue call

Linux · Linux

8.0HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.25% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

7 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 3 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.2-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-riscvAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-55249

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 3 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ieee802154/adf7242: defer destroy_workqueue call There is a possible race condition (use-after-free) like below (FREE) | (USE) adf7242_remove | adf7242_channel cancel_delayed_work_sync | destroy_workqueue (1) | adf7242_cmd_rx | mod_delayed_work (2) | The root cause for this race is that the upper layer (ieee802154) is unaware of this detaching event and the function adf7242_channel can be called without any checks. To fix this, we can add a flag write at the beginning of adf7242_remove and add flag check in adf7242_channel. Or we can just defer the destructive operation like other commit 3e0588c291d6 ("hamradio: defer ax25 kfree after unregister_netdev") which let the ieee802154_unregister_hw() to handle the synchronization. This patch takes the second option. runs")

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ieee802154/adf7242: defer destroy_workqueue call There is a possible race condition (use-after-free) like below (FREE) | (USE) adf7242_remove | adf7242_channel cancel_delayed_work_sync | destroy_workqueue (1) | adf7242_cmd_rx | mod_delayed_work (2) | The root cause for this race is that the upper layer (ieee802154) is unaware of this detaching event and the function adf7242_channel can be called without any checks. To fix this, we can add a flag write at the beginning of adf7242_remove and add flag check in adf7242_channel. Or we can just defer the destructive operation like other commit 3e0588c291d6 ("hamradio: defer ax25 kfree after unregister_netdev") which let the ieee802154_unregister_hw() to handle the synchronization. This patch takes the second option. runs")

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ieee802154/adf7242: defer destroy_workqueue call There is a possible race condition (use-after-free) like below (FREE) | (USE) adf7242_remove | adf7242_channel cancel_delayed_work_sync | destroy_workqueue (1) | adf7242_cmd_rx | mod_delayed_work (2) | The root cause for this race is that the upper layer (ieee802154) is unaware of this detaching event and the function adf7242_channel can be called without any checks. To fix this, we can add a flag write at the beginning of adf7242_remove and add flag check in adf7242_channel. Or we can just defer the destructive operation like other commit 3e0588c291d6 ("hamradio: defer ax25 kfree after unregister_netdev") which let the ieee802154_unregister_hw() to handle the synchronization. This patch takes the second option. runs")

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362 ↗

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
UnauthenticatedCWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2025-1350Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250625Security Bulletin 25 Jun 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 25 Jun 2025, published on 25 June 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49964 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49982 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49983 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49984 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49964 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49972 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0649Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49950 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49952 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49952 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49954 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49964 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49982 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49983 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49983 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49984 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49984 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49985 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0607Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49964 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49972 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49956 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49957 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49958 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49960 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49962 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49963 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49964 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49964 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49965 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49965 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49966 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49966 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49968 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49968 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49972 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49977 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49977 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49980 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49981 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-026733Linux の Linux Kernel における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、競合状態に関する脆弱性、解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 58e9683d14752debc6f22daf6b23e031787df31f < dede80aaf01f4b6e8657d23726cb4a3da226ec4c, 58e9683d14752debc6f22daf6b23e031787df31f < bed12d7531df1417fc92c691999ff95e03835008, 58e9683d14752debc6f22daf6b23e031787df31f < 23a29932715ca43bceb2eae1bdb770995afe7271, 58e9683d14752debc6f22daf6b23e031787df31f < 9f8558c5c642c62c450c98c99b7d18a709fff485, 58e9683d14752debc6f22daf6b23e031787df31f < 15f3b89bd521d5770d36a61fc04a77c293138ba6, 58e9683d14752debc6f22daf6b23e031787df31f < afe7116f6d3b888778ed6d95e3cf724767b9aedf, a2363e2d88bf50022ee643c49ee5d4f7e8c915ea, 4.17.19 < 4.18, 4.18
Fixed
Linux: < 4.18, 4.19.258 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.213 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.142 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.66 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.19.8 ≤ 5.19.*, 6.0 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 18 Jun 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-55249
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49968 · cve.blacktree.nl