BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49928High confidence

SUNRPC: Fix null-ptr-deref when xps sysfs alloc failed

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

2 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-12840

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: SUNRPC: Fix null-ptr-deref when xps sysfs alloc failed There is a null-ptr-deref when xps sysfs alloc failed: BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x40/0xd0 Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000030 by task gssproxy/457 CPU: 5 PID: 457 Comm: gssproxy Not tainted 6.0.0-09040-g02357b27ee03 #9 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 kasan_report+0xa3/0x120 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x40/0xd0 rpc_sysfs_client_setup+0x161/0x1b0 rpc_new_client+0x3fc/0x6e0 rpc_create_xprt+0x71/0x220 rpc_create+0x1d4/0x350 gssp_rpc_create+0xc3/0x160 set_gssp_clnt+0xbc/0x140 write_gssp+0x116/0x1a0 proc_reg_write+0xd6/0x130 vfs_write+0x177/0x690 ksys_write+0xb9/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 When the xprt_switch sysfs alloc failed, should not add xprt and switch sysfs to it, otherwise, maybe null-ptr-deref; also initialize the 'xps_sysfs' to NULL to avoid oops when destroy it.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: SUNRPC: Fix null-ptr-deref when xps sysfs alloc failed There is a null-ptr-deref when xps sysfs alloc failed: BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x40/0xd0 Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000030 by task gssproxy/457 CPU: 5 PID: 457 Comm: gssproxy Not tainted 6.0.0-09040-g02357b27ee03 #9 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 kasan_report+0xa3/0x120 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x40/0xd0 rpc_sysfs_client_setup+0x161/0x1b0 rpc_new_client+0x3fc/0x6e0 rpc_create_xprt+0x71/0x220 rpc_create+0x1d4/0x350 gssp_rpc_create+0xc3/0x160 set_gssp_clnt+0xbc/0x140 write_gssp+0x116/0x1a0 proc_reg_write+0xd6/0x130 vfs_write+0x177/0x690 ksys_write+0xb9/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 When the xprt_switch sysfs alloc failed, should not add xprt and switch sysfs to it, otherwise, maybe null-ptr-deref; also initialize the 'xps_sysfs' to NULL to avoid oops when destroy it.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: SUNRPC: Fix null-ptr-deref when xps sysfs alloc failed There is a null-ptr-deref when xps sysfs alloc failed: BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x40/0xd0 Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000030 by task gssproxy/457 CPU: 5 PID: 457 Comm: gssproxy Not tainted 6.0.0-09040-g02357b27ee03 #9 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44 kasan_report+0xa3/0x120 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x40/0xd0 rpc_sysfs_client_setup+0x161/0x1b0 rpc_new_client+0x3fc/0x6e0 rpc_create_xprt+0x71/0x220 rpc_create+0x1d4/0x350 gssp_rpc_create+0xc3/0x160 set_gssp_clnt+0xbc/0x140 write_gssp+0x116/0x1a0 proc_reg_write+0xd6/0x130 vfs_write+0x177/0x690 ksys_write+0xb9/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 When the xprt_switch sysfs alloc failed, should not add xprt and switch sysfs to it, otherwise, maybe null-ptr-deref; also initialize the 'xps_sysfs' to NULL to avoid oops when destroy it.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticatedCWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-0922Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49922 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49931 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49934 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49936 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49937 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49940 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49942 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49917 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49921 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49922 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49929 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49931 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49934 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49935 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49936 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49937 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49922 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49931 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49934 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49935 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49936 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49936 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49937 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49937 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49938 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49940 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49940 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0560Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49917 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49921 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49922 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49929 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49931 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1990 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28866 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53036 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53036 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53038 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53039 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49917 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49921 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49922 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49929 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49931 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1074 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1074 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1989 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1989 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1990 Référence CVE CVE-2023-28866 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28866 Référence CVE CVE-2023-47233 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49922 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49931 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1990 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1990 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52926 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52927 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53035 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53038 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
baea99445dd4675a834e8a5987d2f368adb62e6c < d59722d088a9d86ce6d9d39979e5d1d669d249f7; baea99445dd4675a834e8a5987d2f368adb62e6c < 7b189b0aa8dab14b49c31c65af8a982e96e25b62; baea99445dd4675a834e8a5987d2f368adb62e6c < cbdeaee94a415800c65a8c3fa04d9664a8b8fb3a; 5.14
Fixed
< 5.14; 5.15.78 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.0.8 ≤ 6.0.*; 6.1 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-12840
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49928 · cve.blacktree.nl