BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49900High confidence

i2c: piix4: Fix adapter not be removed in piix4_remove()

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

2 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-12869

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: piix4: Fix adapter not be removed in piix4_remove() In piix4_probe(), the piix4 adapter will be registered in: piix4_probe() piix4_add_adapters_sb800() / piix4_add_adapter() i2c_add_adapter() Based on the probed device type, piix4_add_adapters_sb800() or single piix4_add_adapter() will be called. For the former case, piix4_adapter_count is set as the number of adapters, while for antoher case it is not set and kept default *zero*. When piix4 is removed, piix4_remove() removes the adapters added in piix4_probe(), basing on the piix4_adapter_count value. Because the count is zero for the single adapter case, the adapter won't be removed and makes the sources allocated for adapter leaked, such as the i2c client and device. These sources can still be accessed by i2c or bus and cause problems. An easily reproduced case is that if a new adapter is registered, i2c will get the leaked adapter and try to call smbus_algorithm, which was already freed: Triggered by: rmmod i2c_piix4 && modprobe max31730 BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc053d860 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 3752 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) RIP: 0010:i2c_default_probe (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:2259) i2c_core RSP: 0018:ffff888107477710 EFLAGS: 00000246 ... <TASK> i2c_detect (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:2302) i2c_core __process_new_driver (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1336) i2c_core bus_for_each_dev (drivers/base/bus.c:301) i2c_for_each_dev (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1823) i2c_core i2c_register_driver (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1861) i2c_core do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1296) do_init_module (kernel/module/main.c:2455) ... </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix this problem by correctly set piix4_adapter_count as 1 for the single adapter so it can be normally removed.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: piix4: Fix adapter not be removed in piix4_remove() In piix4_probe(), the piix4 adapter will be registered in: piix4_probe() piix4_add_adapters_sb800() / piix4_add_adapter() i2c_add_adapter() Based on the probed device type, piix4_add_adapters_sb800() or single piix4_add_adapter() will be called. For the former case, piix4_adapter_count is set as the number of adapters, while for antoher case it is not set and kept default *zero*. When piix4 is removed, piix4_remove() removes the adapters added in piix4_probe(), basing on the piix4_adapter_count value. Because the count is zero for the single adapter case, the adapter won't be removed and makes the sources allocated for adapter leaked, such as the i2c client and device. These sources can still be accessed by i2c or bus and cause problems. An easily reproduced case is that if a new adapter is registered, i2c will get the leaked adapter and try to call smbus_algorithm, which was already freed: Triggered by: rmmod i2c_piix4 && modprobe max31730 BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc053d860 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 3752 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) RIP: 0010:i2c_default_probe (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:2259) i2c_core RSP: 0018:ffff888107477710 EFLAGS: 00000246 ... <TASK> i2c_detect (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:2302) i2c_core __process_new_driver (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1336) i2c_core bus_for_each_dev (drivers/base/bus.c:301) i2c_for_each_dev (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1823) i2c_core i2c_register_driver (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1861) i2c_core do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1296) do_init_module (kernel/module/main.c:2455) ... </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix this problem by correctly set piix4_adapter_count as 1 for the single adapter so it can be normally removed.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i2c: piix4: Fix adapter not be removed in piix4_remove() In piix4_probe(), the piix4 adapter will be registered in: piix4_probe() piix4_add_adapters_sb800() / piix4_add_adapter() i2c_add_adapter() Based on the probed device type, piix4_add_adapters_sb800() or single piix4_add_adapter() will be called. For the former case, piix4_adapter_count is set as the number of adapters, while for antoher case it is not set and kept default *zero*. When piix4 is removed, piix4_remove() removes the adapters added in piix4_probe(), basing on the piix4_adapter_count value. Because the count is zero for the single adapter case, the adapter won't be removed and makes the sources allocated for adapter leaked, such as the i2c client and device. These sources can still be accessed by i2c or bus and cause problems. An easily reproduced case is that if a new adapter is registered, i2c will get the leaked adapter and try to call smbus_algorithm, which was already freed: Triggered by: rmmod i2c_piix4 && modprobe max31730 BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc053d860 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 3752 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) RIP: 0010:i2c_default_probe (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:2259) i2c_core RSP: 0018:ffff888107477710 EFLAGS: 00000246 ... <TASK> i2c_detect (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:2302) i2c_core __process_new_driver (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1336) i2c_core bus_for_each_dev (drivers/base/bus.c:301) i2c_for_each_dev (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1823) i2c_core i2c_register_driver (drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c:1861) i2c_core do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1296) do_init_module (kernel/module/main.c:2455) ... </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fix this problem by correctly set piix4_adapter_count as 1 for the single adapter so it can be normally removed.

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Double Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-415

CWE-415: Double Free. The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-415
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-0922Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff und nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49880 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49887 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49888 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49890 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49891 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49892 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49900 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49905 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49906 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49908 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49887 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49888 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49890 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49891 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49892 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49900 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49901 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49902 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49905 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49906 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49908 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49880 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49887 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49888 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49890 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49891 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49892 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49900 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49905 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49906 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49908 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0560Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49887 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49888 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49890 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49891 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49892 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49900 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49901 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49902 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49905 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49906 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49908 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49886 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49886 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49887 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49888 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49890 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49891 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49892 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49898 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49898 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49900 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49901 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49902 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49902 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49905 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49906 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49907 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49907 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49908 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49880 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49881 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49881 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49885 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49885 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49887 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49887 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49888 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49888 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49889 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49889 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49890 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49890 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49891 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49891 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49892 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49892 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49900 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49900 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49905 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49906 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49906 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49908 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49908 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49922 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
528d53a1592b0e27c423f7cafc1df85f77fc1163 < bfd5e62f9a7ee214661cb6f143a3b40ccc63317f; 528d53a1592b0e27c423f7cafc1df85f77fc1163 < d78ccdce662e88f41e87e90cf2bee63c1715d2a5; 528d53a1592b0e27c423f7cafc1df85f77fc1163 < fe51636fffc8108c7c4da6aa393010e786530ad9; 528d53a1592b0e27c423f7cafc1df85f77fc1163 < 569bea74c94d37785682b11bab76f557520477cd; 5.4
Fixed
< 5.4; 5.10.154 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.78 ≤ 5.15.*; 6.0.8 ≤ 6.0.*; 6.1 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:08 UTC · CWE-415 · Double Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-12869
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49900 · cve.blacktree.nl