BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49799High confidence

tracing: Fix wild-memory-access in register_synth_event()

Linux · Linux

7.1HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

6 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-12979

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix wild-memory-access in register_synth_event() In register_synth_event(), if set_synth_event_print_fmt() failed, then both trace_remove_event_call() and unregister_trace_event() will be called, which means the trace_event_call will call __unregister_trace_event() twice. As the result, the second unregister will causes the wild-memory-access. register_synth_event set_synth_event_print_fmt failed trace_remove_event_call event_remove if call->event.funcs then __unregister_trace_event (first call) unregister_trace_event __unregister_trace_event (second call) Fix the bug by avoiding to call the second __unregister_trace_event() by checking if the first one is called. general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xfbd59c0000000024: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000120-0xdead000000000127] CPU: 0 PID: 3807 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1-00186-g76f33a7eedb4 #299 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:unregister_trace_event+0x6e/0x280 Code: 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 0e 02 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 63 08 4c 89 e2 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 e2 01 00 00 49 89 2c 24 48 85 ed 74 28 e8 7a 9b RSP: 0018:ffff88810413f370 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888105d050b0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 1bd5a00000000024 RSI: ffff888119e276e0 RDI: ffffffff835a8b20 RBP: dead000000000100 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff0913481 R10: ffffffff8489a407 R11: fffffbfff0913480 R12: dead000000000122 R13: ffff888105d050b8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888105d05028 FS: 00007f7823e8d540(0000) GS:ffff888119e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f7823e7ebec CR3: 000000010a058002 CR4: 0000000000330ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __create_synth_event+0x1e37/0x1eb0 create_or_delete_synth_event+0x110/0x250 synth_event_run_command+0x2f/0x110 test_gen_synth_cmd+0x170/0x2eb [synth_event_gen_test] synth_event_gen_test_init+0x76/0x9bc [synth_event_gen_test] do_one_initcall+0xdb/0x480 do_init_module+0x1cf/0x680 load_module+0x6a50/0x70a0 __do_sys_finit_module+0x12f/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix wild-memory-access in register_synth_event() In register_synth_event(), if set_synth_event_print_fmt() failed, then both trace_remove_event_call() and unregister_trace_event() will be called, which means the trace_event_call will call __unregister_trace_event() twice. As the result, the second unregister will causes the wild-memory-access. register_synth_event set_synth_event_print_fmt failed trace_remove_event_call event_remove if call->event.funcs then __unregister_trace_event (first call) unregister_trace_event __unregister_trace_event (second call) Fix the bug by avoiding to call the second __unregister_trace_event() by checking if the first one is called. general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xfbd59c0000000024: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000120-0xdead000000000127] CPU: 0 PID: 3807 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1-00186-g76f33a7eedb4 #299 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:unregister_trace_event+0x6e/0x280 Code: 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 0e 02 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 63 08 4c 89 e2 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 e2 01 00 00 49 89 2c 24 48 85 ed 74 28 e8 7a 9b RSP: 0018:ffff88810413f370 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888105d050b0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 1bd5a00000000024 RSI: ffff888119e276e0 RDI: ffffffff835a8b20 RBP: dead000000000100 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff0913481 R10: ffffffff8489a407 R11: fffffbfff0913480 R12: dead000000000122 R13: ffff888105d050b8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888105d05028 FS: 00007f7823e8d540(0000) GS:ffff888119e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f7823e7ebec CR3: 000000010a058002 CR4: 0000000000330ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __create_synth_event+0x1e37/0x1eb0 create_or_delete_synth_event+0x110/0x250 synth_event_run_command+0x2f/0x110 test_gen_synth_cmd+0x170/0x2eb [synth_event_gen_test] synth_event_gen_test_init+0x76/0x9bc [synth_event_gen_test] do_one_initcall+0xdb/0x480 do_init_module+0x1cf/0x680 load_module+0x6a50/0x70a0 __do_sys_finit_module+0x12f/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix wild-memory-access in register_synth_event() In register_synth_event(), if set_synth_event_print_fmt() failed, then both trace_remove_event_call() and unregister_trace_event() will be called, which means the trace_event_call will call __unregister_trace_event() twice. As the result, the second unregister will causes the wild-memory-access. register_synth_event set_synth_event_print_fmt failed trace_remove_event_call event_remove if call->event.funcs then __unregister_trace_event (first call) unregister_trace_event __unregister_trace_event (second call) Fix the bug by avoiding to call the second __unregister_trace_event() by checking if the first one is called. general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xfbd59c0000000024: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000120-0xdead000000000127] CPU: 0 PID: 3807 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1-00186-g76f33a7eedb4 #299 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:unregister_trace_event+0x6e/0x280 Code: 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 0e 02 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 63 08 4c 89 e2 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 e2 01 00 00 49 89 2c 24 48 85 ed 74 28 e8 7a 9b RSP: 0018:ffff88810413f370 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888105d050b0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 1bd5a00000000024 RSI: ffff888119e276e0 RDI: ffffffff835a8b20 RBP: dead000000000100 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff0913481 R10: ffffffff8489a407 R11: fffffbfff0913480 R12: dead000000000122 R13: ffff888105d050b8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888105d05028 FS: 00007f7823e8d540(0000) GS:ffff888119e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f7823e7ebec CR3: 000000010a058002 CR4: 0000000000330ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __create_synth_event+0x1e37/0x1eb0 create_or_delete_synth_event+0x110/0x250 synth_event_run_command+0x2f/0x110 test_gen_synth_cmd+0x170/0x2eb [synth_event_gen_test] synth_event_gen_test_init+0x76/0x9bc [synth_event_gen_test] do_one_initcall+0xdb/0x480 do_init_module+0x1cf/0x680 load_module+0x6a50/0x70a0 __do_sys_finit_module+0x12f/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

Why

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Read → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-125 ↗

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-125
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250507Security Bulletin 07 May 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 May 2025, published on 7 May 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49800 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49795 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49800 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49800 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0560Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49795 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49800 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49795 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49800 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49800 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49801 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49807 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-026643Linux の Linux Kernel における境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、境界外読み取りに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 4b147936fa509650beaf638b331573c23ba4d609 < 315b149f08229a233d47532eb5da1707b28f764c, 4b147936fa509650beaf638b331573c23ba4d609 < 6517b97134f724d12f673f9fb4f456d75c7a905f, 4b147936fa509650beaf638b331573c23ba4d609 < a5bfa53e5036b3e7a80be902dd3719a930accabd, 4b147936fa509650beaf638b331573c23ba4d609 < 1b5f1c34d3f5a664a57a5a7557a50e4e3cc2505c, 4.17
Fixed
Linux: < 4.17, 5.10.156 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.80 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.0.10 ≤ 6.0.*, 6.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:07 UTC · CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-12979
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49799 · cve.blacktree.nl