BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49789High confidence

scsi: zfcp: Fix double free of FSF request when qdio send fails

Linux · Linux

7.0HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.20% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

6 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 2 affected package states shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.0.10-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-12993

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 2 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: zfcp: Fix double free of FSF request when qdio send fails We used to use the wrong type of integer in 'zfcp_fsf_req_send()' to cache the FSF request ID when sending a new FSF request. This is used in case the sending fails and we need to remove the request from our internal hash table again (so we don't keep an invalid reference and use it when we free the request again). In 'zfcp_fsf_req_send()' we used to cache the ID as 'int' (signed and 32 bit wide), but the rest of the zfcp code (and the firmware specification) handles the ID as 'unsigned long'/'u64' (unsigned and 64 bit wide [s390x ELF ABI]). For one this has the obvious problem that when the ID grows past 32 bit (this can happen reasonably fast) it is truncated to 32 bit when storing it in the cache variable and so doesn't match the original ID anymore. The second less obvious problem is that even when the original ID has not yet grown past 32 bit, as soon as the 32nd bit is set in the original ID (0x80000000 = 2'147'483'648) we will have a mismatch when we cast it back to 'unsigned long'. As the cached variable is of a signed type, the compiler will choose a sign-extending instruction to load the 32 bit variable into a 64 bit register (e.g.: 'lgf %r11,188(%r15)'). So once we pass the cached variable into 'zfcp_reqlist_find_rm()' to remove the request again all the leading zeros will be flipped to ones to extend the sign and won't match the original ID anymore (this has been observed in practice). If we can't successfully remove the request from the hash table again after 'zfcp_qdio_send()' fails (this happens regularly when zfcp cannot notify the adapter about new work because the adapter is already gone during e.g. a ChpID toggle) we will end up with a double free. We unconditionally free the request in the calling function when 'zfcp_fsf_req_send()' fails, but because the request is still in the hash table we end up with a stale memory reference, and once the zfcp adapter is either reset during recovery or shutdown we end up freeing the same memory twice. The resulting stack traces vary depending on the kernel and have no direct correlation to the place where the bug occurs. Here are three examples that have been seen in practice: list_del corruption. next->prev should be 00000001b9d13800, but was 00000000dead4ead. (next=00000001bd131a00) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:62! monitor event: 0040 ilc:2 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: ... CPU: 9 PID: 1617 Comm: zfcperp0.0.1740 Kdump: loaded Hardware name: ... Krnl PSW : 0704d00180000000 00000003cbeea1f8 (__list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0x140) R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:1 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 Krnl GPRS: 00000000916d12f1 0000000080000000 000000000000006d 00000003cb665cd6 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000d28d21e8 00000000d3844000 00000380099efd28 00000001bd131a00 00000001b9d13800 00000000d3290100 0000000000000000 00000003cbeea1f4 00000380099efc70 Krnl Code: 00000003cbeea1e8: c020004f68a7 larl %r2,00000003cc8d7336 00000003cbeea1ee: c0e50027fd65 brasl %r14,00000003cc3e9cb8 #00000003cbeea1f4: af000000 mc 0,0 >00000003cbeea1f8: c02000920440 larl %r2,00000003cd12aa78 00000003cbeea1fe: c0e500289c25 brasl %r14,00000003cc3fda48 00000003cbeea204: b9040043 lgr %r4,%r3 00000003cbeea208: b9040051 lgr %r5,%r1 00000003cbeea20c: b9040032 lgr %r3,%r2 Call Trace: [<00000003cbeea1f8>] __list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0x140 ([<00000003cbeea1f4>] __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0x140) [<000003ff7ff502fe>] zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all+0xde/0x150 [zfcp] [<000003ff7ff49cd0>] zfcp_erp_strategy_do_action+0x160/0x280 [zfcp] ---truncated---

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: zfcp: Fix double free of FSF request when qdio send fails We used to use the wrong type of integer in 'zfcp_fsf_req_send()' to cache the FSF request ID when sending a new FSF request. This is used in case the sending fails and we need to remove the request from our internal hash table again (so we don't keep an invalid reference and use it when we free the request again). In 'zfcp_fsf_req_send()' we used to cache the ID as 'int' (signed and 32 bit wide), but the rest of the zfcp code (and the firmware specification) handles the ID as 'unsigned long'/'u64' (unsigned and 64 bit wide [s390x ELF ABI]). For one this has the obvious problem that when the ID grows past 32 bit (this can happen reasonably fast) it is truncated to 32 bit when storing it in the cache variable and so doesn't match the original ID anymore. The second less obvious problem is that even when the original ID has not yet grown past 32 bit, as soon as the 32nd bit is set in the original ID (0x80000000 = 2'147'483'648) we will have a mismatch when we cast it back to 'unsigned long'. As the cached variable is of a signed type, the compiler will choose a sign-extending instruction to load the 32 bit variable into a 64 bit register (e.g.: 'lgf %r11,188(%r15)'). So once we pass the cached variable into 'zfcp_reqlist_find_rm()' to remove the request again all the leading zeros will be flipped to ones to extend the sign and won't match the original ID anymore (this has been observed in practice). If we can't successfully remove the request from the hash table again after 'zfcp_qdio_send()' fails (this happens regularly when zfcp cannot notify the adapter about new work because the adapter is already gone during e.g. a ChpID toggle) we will end up with a double free. We unconditionally free the request in the calling function when 'zfcp_fsf_req_send()' fails, but because the request is still in the hash table we end up with a stale memory reference, and once the zfcp adapter is either reset during recovery or shutdown we end up freeing the same memory twice. The resulting stack traces vary depending on the kernel and have no direct correlation to the place where the bug occurs. Here are three examples that have been seen in practice: list_del corruption. next->prev should be 00000001b9d13800, but was 00000000dead4ead. (next=00000001bd131a00) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:62! monitor event: 0040 ilc:2 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: ... CPU: 9 PID: 1617 Comm: zfcperp0.0.1740 Kdump: loaded Hardware name: ... Krnl PSW : 0704d00180000000 00000003cbeea1f8 (__list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0x140) R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:1 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 Krnl GPRS: 00000000916d12f1 0000000080000000 000000000000006d 00000003cb665cd6 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000d28d21e8 00000000d3844000 00000380099efd28 00000001bd131a00 00000001b9d13800 00000000d3290100 0000000000000000 00000003cbeea1f4 00000380099efc70 Krnl Code: 00000003cbeea1e8: c020004f68a7 larl %r2,00000003cc8d7336 00000003cbeea1ee: c0e50027fd65 brasl %r14,00000003cc3e9cb8 #00000003cbeea1f4: af000000 mc 0,0 >00000003cbeea1f8: c02000920440 larl %r2,00000003cd12aa78 00000003cbeea1fe: c0e500289c25 brasl %r14,00000003cc3fda48 00000003cbeea204: b9040043 lgr %r4,%r3 00000003cbeea208: b9040051 lgr %r5,%r1 00000003cbeea20c: b9040032 lgr %r3,%r2 Call Trace: [<00000003cbeea1f8>] __list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0x140 ([<00000003cbeea1f4>] __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0x140) [<000003ff7ff502fe>] zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all+0xde/0x150 [zfcp] [<000003ff7ff49cd0>] zfcp_erp_strategy_do_action+0x160/0x280 [zfcp] ---truncated---

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: zfcp: Fix double free of FSF request when qdio send fails We used to use the wrong type of integer in 'zfcp_fsf_req_send()' to cache the FSF request ID when sending a new FSF request. This is used in case the sending fails and we need to remove the request from our internal hash table again (so we don't keep an invalid reference and use it when we free the request again). In 'zfcp_fsf_req_send()' we used to cache the ID as 'int' (signed and 32 bit wide), but the rest of the zfcp code (and the firmware specification) handles the ID as 'unsigned long'/'u64' (unsigned and 64 bit wide [s390x ELF ABI]). For one this has the obvious problem that when the ID grows past 32 bit (this can happen reasonably fast) it is truncated to 32 bit when storing it in the cache variable and so doesn't match the original ID anymore. The second less obvious problem is that even when the original ID has not yet grown past 32 bit, as soon as the 32nd bit is set in the original ID (0x80000000 = 2'147'483'648) we will have a mismatch when we cast it back to 'unsigned long'. As the cached variable is of a signed type, the compiler will choose a sign-extending instruction to load the 32 bit variable into a 64 bit register (e.g.: 'lgf %r11,188(%r15)'). So once we pass the cached variable into 'zfcp_reqlist_find_rm()' to remove the request again all the leading zeros will be flipped to ones to extend the sign and won't match the original ID anymore (this has been observed in practice). If we can't successfully remove the request from the hash table again after 'zfcp_qdio_send()' fails (this happens regularly when zfcp cannot notify the adapter about new work because the adapter is already gone during e.g. a ChpID toggle) we will end up with a double free. We unconditionally free the request in the calling function when 'zfcp_fsf_req_send()' fails, but because the request is still in the hash table we end up with a stale memory reference, and once the zfcp adapter is either reset during recovery or shutdown we end up freeing the same memory twice. The resulting stack traces vary depending on the kernel and have no direct correlation to the place where the bug occurs. Here are three examples that have been seen in practice: list_del corruption. next->prev should be 00000001b9d13800, but was 00000000dead4ead. (next=00000001bd131a00) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:62! monitor event: 0040 ilc:2 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: ... CPU: 9 PID: 1617 Comm: zfcperp0.0.1740 Kdump: loaded Hardware name: ... Krnl PSW : 0704d00180000000 00000003cbeea1f8 (__list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0x140) R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:1 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 Krnl GPRS: 00000000916d12f1 0000000080000000 000000000000006d 00000003cb665cd6 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000d28d21e8 00000000d3844000 00000380099efd28 00000001bd131a00 00000001b9d13800 00000000d3290100 0000000000000000 00000003cbeea1f4 00000380099efc70 Krnl Code: 00000003cbeea1e8: c020004f68a7 larl %r2,00000003cc8d7336 00000003cbeea1ee: c0e50027fd65 brasl %r14,00000003cc3e9cb8 #00000003cbeea1f4: af000000 mc 0,0 >00000003cbeea1f8: c02000920440 larl %r2,00000003cd12aa78 00000003cbeea1fe: c0e500289c25 brasl %r14,00000003cc3fda48 00000003cbeea204: b9040043 lgr %r4,%r3 00000003cbeea208: b9040051 lgr %r5,%r1 00000003cbeea20c: b9040032 lgr %r3,%r2 Call Trace: [<00000003cbeea1f8>] __list_del_entry_valid+0x98/0x140 ([<00000003cbeea1f4>] __list_del_entry_valid+0x94/0x140) [<000003ff7ff502fe>] zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all+0xde/0x150 [zfcp] [<000003ff7ff49cd0>] zfcp_erp_strategy_do_action+0x160/0x280 [zfcp] ---truncated---

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Double Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-415 ↗

CWE-415: Double Free. The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-415
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250507Security Bulletin 07 May 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 May 2025, published on 7 May 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49781 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49784 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49786 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49795 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0560Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49781 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49784 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49786 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49795 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49781 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49784 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49784 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49786 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49786 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49795 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49795 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49792 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49792 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49793 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49793 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49794 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49794 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49796 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49796 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49797 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49797 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49800 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-026668Linux の Linux Kernel における二重解放に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、二重解放に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: e60a6d69f1f84c2ef1cc63aefaadfe7ae9f12934 < 1bf8ed585501bb2dd0b5f67c824eab45adfbdccd, e60a6d69f1f84c2ef1cc63aefaadfe7ae9f12934 < d2c7d8f58e9cde8ac8d1f75e9d66c2a813ffe0ab, e60a6d69f1f84c2ef1cc63aefaadfe7ae9f12934 < 11edbdee4399401f533adda9bffe94567aa08b96, e60a6d69f1f84c2ef1cc63aefaadfe7ae9f12934 < 90a49a6b015fa439cd62e45121390284c125a91f, e60a6d69f1f84c2ef1cc63aefaadfe7ae9f12934 < 0954256e970ecf371b03a6c9af2cf91b9c4085ff, 2.6.34
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.34, 5.4.225 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.156 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.80 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.0.10 ≤ 6.0.*, 6.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC · CWE-415 · Double Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-12993
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49789 · cve.blacktree.nl