BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49771High confidence

dm ioctl: fix misbehavior if list_versions races with module loading

Linux · Linux

4.7MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

2 package states
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 11 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2025-12992

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm ioctl: fix misbehavior if list_versions races with module loading __list_versions will first estimate the required space using the "dm_target_iterate(list_version_get_needed, &needed)" call and then will fill the space using the "dm_target_iterate(list_version_get_info, &iter_info)" call. Each of these calls locks the targets using the "down_read(&_lock)" and "up_read(&_lock)" calls, however between the first and second "dm_target_iterate" there is no lock held and the target modules can be loaded at this point, so the second "dm_target_iterate" call may need more space than what was the first "dm_target_iterate" returned. The code tries to handle this overflow (see the beginning of list_version_get_info), however this handling is incorrect. The code sets "param->data_size = param->data_start + needed" and "iter_info.end = (char *)vers+len" - "needed" is the size returned by the first dm_target_iterate call; "len" is the size of the buffer allocated by userspace. "len" may be greater than "needed"; in this case, the code will write up to "len" bytes into the buffer, however param->data_size is set to "needed", so it may write data past the param->data_size value. The ioctl interface copies only up to param->data_size into userspace, thus part of the result will be truncated. Fix this bug by setting "iter_info.end = (char *)vers + needed;" - this guarantees that the second "dm_target_iterate" call will write only up to the "needed" buffer and it will exit with "DM_BUFFER_FULL_FLAG" if it overflows the "needed" space - in this case, userspace will allocate a larger buffer and retry. Note that there is also a bug in list_version_get_needed - we need to add "strlen(tt->name) + 1" to the needed size, not "strlen(tt->name)".

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm ioctl: fix misbehavior if list_versions races with module loading __list_versions will first estimate the required space using the "dm_target_iterate(list_version_get_needed, &needed)" call and then will fill the space using the "dm_target_iterate(list_version_get_info, &iter_info)" call. Each of these calls locks the targets using the "down_read(&_lock)" and "up_read(&_lock)" calls, however between the first and second "dm_target_iterate" there is no lock held and the target modules can be loaded at this point, so the second "dm_target_iterate" call may need more space than what was the first "dm_target_iterate" returned. The code tries to handle this overflow (see the beginning of list_version_get_info), however this handling is incorrect. The code sets "param->data_size = param->data_start + needed" and "iter_info.end = (char *)vers+len" - "needed" is the size returned by the first dm_target_iterate call; "len" is the size of the buffer allocated by userspace. "len" may be greater than "needed"; in this case, the code will write up to "len" bytes into the buffer, however param->data_size is set to "needed", so it may write data past the param->data_size value. The ioctl interface copies only up to param->data_size into userspace, thus part of the result will be truncated. Fix this bug by setting "iter_info.end = (char *)vers + needed;" - this guarantees that the second "dm_target_iterate" call will write only up to the "needed" buffer and it will exit with "DM_BUFFER_FULL_FLAG" if it overflows the "needed" space - in this case, userspace will allocate a larger buffer and retry. Note that there is also a bug in list_version_get_needed - we need to add "strlen(tt->name) + 1" to the needed size, not "strlen(tt->name)".

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm ioctl: fix misbehavior if list_versions races with module loading __list_versions will first estimate the required space using the "dm_target_iterate(list_version_get_needed, &needed)" call and then will fill the space using the "dm_target_iterate(list_version_get_info, &iter_info)" call. Each of these calls locks the targets using the "down_read(&_lock)" and "up_read(&_lock)" calls, however between the first and second "dm_target_iterate" there is no lock held and the target modules can be loaded at this point, so the second "dm_target_iterate" call may need more space than what was the first "dm_target_iterate" returned. The code tries to handle this overflow (see the beginning of list_version_get_info), however this handling is incorrect. The code sets "param->data_size = param->data_start + needed" and "iter_info.end = (char *)vers+len" - "needed" is the size returned by the first dm_target_iterate call; "len" is the size of the buffer allocated by userspace. "len" may be greater than "needed"; in this case, the code will write up to "len" bytes into the buffer, however param->data_size is set to "needed", so it may write data past the param->data_size value. The ioctl interface copies only up to param->data_size into userspace, thus part of the result will be truncated. Fix this bug by setting "iter_info.end = (char *)vers + needed;" - this guarantees that the second "dm_target_iterate" call will write only up to the "needed" buffer and it will exit with "DM_BUFFER_FULL_FLAG" if it overflows the "needed" space - in this case, userspace will allocate a larger buffer and retry. Note that there is also a bug in list_version_get_needed - we need to add "strlen(tt->name) + 1" to the needed size, not "strlen(tt->name)".

Why

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High: exploitation depends on specific conditions
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-362

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACHighAttack complexity: Successful exploitation depends on specific conditions outside the attacker's direct control.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-362
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250507Security Bulletin 07 May 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 07 May 2025, published on 7 May 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

VERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4662 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49767 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1009Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4662 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49762 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49763 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49773 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49781 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

VERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4662 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49767 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0560Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

2025:02173-1 du 30 juin 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202502173-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49762 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49763 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49773 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49781 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49728 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49729 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49729 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49751 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49751 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49761 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49761 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49762 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49762 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49763 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49763 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49767 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49773 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49773 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49781 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49781 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49563 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49767 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49776 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49777 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49777 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49779 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49779 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49783 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49787 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-026662Linux の Linux Kernel における競合状態に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、競合状態に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
Linux: 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 0c8d4112df329bf3dfbf27693f918c3b08676538, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 6a818db0d5aecf80d4ba9e10ac153f60adc629ca, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 3a1c35d72dc0b34d1e746ed705790c0f630aa427, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < b545c0e1e4094d4de2bdfe9a3823f9154b0c0005, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < f59f5a269ca5e43c567aca7f1f52500a0186e9b7, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 6ffce7a92ef5c68f7e5d6f4d722c2f96280c064b, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 5398b8e275bf81a2517b327d216c0f37ac9ac5ae, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 4fe1ec995483737f3d2a14c3fe1d8fe634972979, 2.6.12
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.12, 4.9.334 ≤ 4.9.*, 4.14.300 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.267 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.225 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.156 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.80 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.0.10 ≤ 6.0.*, 6.1 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 1 May 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:06 UTC · CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2025-12992
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49771 · cve.blacktree.nl