BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49636High confidence

vlan: fix memory leak in vlan_newlink()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 23 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.30% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.14-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-54596

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vlan: fix memory leak in vlan_newlink() Blamed commit added back a bug I fixed in commit 9bbd917e0bec ("vlan: fix memory leak in vlan_dev_set_egress_priority") If a memory allocation fails in vlan_changelink() after other allocations succeeded, we need to call vlan_dev_free_egress_priority() to free all allocated memory because after a failed ->newlink() we do not call any methods like ndo_uninit() or dev->priv_destructor(). In following example, if the allocation for last element 2000:2001 fails, we need to free eight prior allocations: ip link add link dummy0 dummy0.100 type vlan id 100 \ egress-qos-map 1:2 2:3 3:4 4:5 5:6 6:7 7:8 8:9 2000:2001 syzbot report was: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff888117bd1060 (size 32): comm "syz-executor408", pid 3759, jiffies 4294956555 (age 34.090s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 09 00 00 00 00 a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff83fc60ad>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:600 [inline] [<ffffffff83fc60ad>] vlan_dev_set_egress_priority+0xed/0x170 net/8021q/vlan_dev.c:193 [<ffffffff83fc6628>] vlan_changelink+0x178/0x1d0 net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c:128 [<ffffffff83fc67c8>] vlan_newlink+0x148/0x260 net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c:185 [<ffffffff838b1278>] rtnl_newlink_create net/core/rtnetlink.c:3363 [inline] [<ffffffff838b1278>] __rtnl_newlink+0xa58/0xdc0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3580 [<ffffffff838b1629>] rtnl_newlink+0x49/0x70 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3593 [<ffffffff838ac66c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x21c/0x5c0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6089 [<ffffffff839f9c37>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x87/0x1d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501 [<ffffffff839f8da7>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] [<ffffffff839f8da7>] netlink_unicast+0x397/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 [<ffffffff839f9266>] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x710 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 [<ffffffff8384dbf6>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] [<ffffffff8384dbf6>] sock_sendmsg+0x56/0x80 net/socket.c:734 [<ffffffff8384e15c>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x36c/0x390 net/socket.c:2488 [<ffffffff838523cb>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x8b/0xd0 net/socket.c:2542 [<ffffffff838525b8>] __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2571 [inline] [<ffffffff838525b8>] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2580 [inline] [<ffffffff838525b8>] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2578 [inline] [<ffffffff838525b8>] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xf0 net/socket.c:2578 [<ffffffff845ad8d5>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<ffffffff845ad8d5>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<ffffffff8460006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vlan: fix memory leak in vlan_newlink() Blamed commit added back a bug I fixed in commit 9bbd917e0bec ("vlan: fix memory leak in vlan_dev_set_egress_priority") If a memory allocation fails in vlan_changelink() after other allocations succeeded, we need to call vlan_dev_free_egress_priority() to free all allocated memory because after a failed ->newlink() we do not call any methods like ndo_uninit() or dev->priv_destructor(). In following example, if the allocation for last element 2000:2001 fails, we need to free eight prior allocations: ip link add link dummy0 dummy0.100 type vlan id 100 \ egress-qos-map 1:2 2:3 3:4 4:5 5:6 6:7 7:8 8:9 2000:2001 syzbot report was: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff888117bd1060 (size 32): comm "syz-executor408", pid 3759, jiffies 4294956555 (age 34.090s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 09 00 00 00 00 a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff83fc60ad>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:600 [inline] [<ffffffff83fc60ad>] vlan_dev_set_egress_priority+0xed/0x170 net/8021q/vlan_dev.c:193 [<ffffffff83fc6628>] vlan_changelink+0x178/0x1d0 net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c:128 [<ffffffff83fc67c8>] vlan_newlink+0x148/0x260 net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c:185 [<ffffffff838b1278>] rtnl_newlink_create net/core/rtnetlink.c:3363 [inline] [<ffffffff838b1278>] __rtnl_newlink+0xa58/0xdc0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3580 [<ffffffff838b1629>] rtnl_newlink+0x49/0x70 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3593 [<ffffffff838ac66c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x21c/0x5c0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6089 [<ffffffff839f9c37>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x87/0x1d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501 [<ffffffff839f8da7>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] [<ffffffff839f8da7>] netlink_unicast+0x397/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 [<ffffffff839f9266>] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x710 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 [<ffffffff8384dbf6>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] [<ffffffff8384dbf6>] sock_sendmsg+0x56/0x80 net/socket.c:734 [<ffffffff8384e15c>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x36c/0x390 net/socket.c:2488 [<ffffffff838523cb>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x8b/0xd0 net/socket.c:2542 [<ffffffff838525b8>] __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2571 [inline] [<ffffffff838525b8>] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2580 [inline] [<ffffffff838525b8>] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2578 [inline] [<ffffffff838525b8>] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xf0 net/socket.c:2578 [<ffffffff845ad8d5>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<ffffffff845ad8d5>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<ffffffff8460006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vlan: fix memory leak in vlan_newlink() Blamed commit added back a bug I fixed in commit 9bbd917e0bec ("vlan: fix memory leak in vlan_dev_set_egress_priority") If a memory allocation fails in vlan_changelink() after other allocations succeeded, we need to call vlan_dev_free_egress_priority() to free all allocated memory because after a failed ->newlink() we do not call any methods like ndo_uninit() or dev->priv_destructor(). In following example, if the allocation for last element 2000:2001 fails, we need to free eight prior allocations: ip link add link dummy0 dummy0.100 type vlan id 100 \ egress-qos-map 1:2 2:3 3:4 4:5 5:6 6:7 7:8 8:9 2000:2001 syzbot report was: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff888117bd1060 (size 32): comm "syz-executor408", pid 3759, jiffies 4294956555 (age 34.090s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 09 00 00 00 00 a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff83fc60ad>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:600 [inline] [<ffffffff83fc60ad>] vlan_dev_set_egress_priority+0xed/0x170 net/8021q/vlan_dev.c:193 [<ffffffff83fc6628>] vlan_changelink+0x178/0x1d0 net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c:128 [<ffffffff83fc67c8>] vlan_newlink+0x148/0x260 net/8021q/vlan_netlink.c:185 [<ffffffff838b1278>] rtnl_newlink_create net/core/rtnetlink.c:3363 [inline] [<ffffffff838b1278>] __rtnl_newlink+0xa58/0xdc0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3580 [<ffffffff838b1629>] rtnl_newlink+0x49/0x70 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3593 [<ffffffff838ac66c>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x21c/0x5c0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6089 [<ffffffff839f9c37>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x87/0x1d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501 [<ffffffff839f8da7>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] [<ffffffff839f8da7>] netlink_unicast+0x397/0x4c0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 [<ffffffff839f9266>] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x710 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 [<ffffffff8384dbf6>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] [<ffffffff8384dbf6>] sock_sendmsg+0x56/0x80 net/socket.c:734 [<ffffffff8384e15c>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x36c/0x390 net/socket.c:2488 [<ffffffff838523cb>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x8b/0xd0 net/socket.c:2542 [<ffffffff838525b8>] __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2571 [inline] [<ffffffff838525b8>] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2580 [inline] [<ffffffff838525b8>] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2578 [inline] [<ffffffff838525b8>] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xf0 net/socket.c:2578 [<ffffffff845ad8d5>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<ffffffff845ad8d5>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<ffffffff8460006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401 ↗

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250305Security Bulletin 5 March 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 March 2025, published on 5 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-49613 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49620 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49620 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49624 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49624 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49625 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49625 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49627 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49627 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49629 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49629 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49631 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49631 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49633 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49633 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49634 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49637 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49637 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49638 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49638 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49639 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49639 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49641 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49641 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49642 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49642 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49643 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49643 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49646 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0756Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ord?id=CVE-2022-46908 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48303 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48303 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48522 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48893 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4899 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49043 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49043 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49063 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49168 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49535 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49728 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0215 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0216 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0217 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0401 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0687 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0687

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0625Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

//ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7651-5 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7651-6 du 24 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7651-6 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7665-2 du 24 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7665-2 Référence CVE CVE-2022-21546 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-21546 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48893 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48893 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49063 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49063 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49168 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49535 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49535 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49728 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52572 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52572 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52757 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52757 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26686 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26686 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26739 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26739 Référence CVE CVE-2024-27402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27402 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0622Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

ERecord?id=CVE-2022-41724 Référence CVE CVE-2022-41725 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41725 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4203 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4203 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-42916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4304 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4304 Référence CVE CVE-2022-43551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43551 Référence CVE CVE-2022-43552 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43552 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4450 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49728 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0215 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0215 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0216 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0217 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0217 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0401 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0464 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464 Référence CVE CVE-2023-0465 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0605Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

1 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7608-6 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7610-3 du 15 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7610-3 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7585-7 du 16 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7585-7 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7640-1 du 16 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7640-1 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7611-3 du 17 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7611-3 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47191 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47211 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52741 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52741 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52927 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26689 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26689 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26996 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26996 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0589Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

28-1 du 08 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7628-1 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu LSN-0113-1 du 10 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/LSN-0113-1 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47260 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47379 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47576 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49176 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49179 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49728 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-41070 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41070 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42230 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46753 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46753 Référence CVE CVE-2024-46787 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0559Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu

ces/USN-7609-1 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7609-2 du 01 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7609-2 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7585-6 du 03 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7585-6 Bulletin de sécurité Ubuntu USN-7608-4 du 03 juillet 2025 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7608-4 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47211 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47211 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47260 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47576 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47576 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49728 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49728 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49909 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49909 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52664 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52927 Référence CVE CVE-2023-53034 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53034 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26982 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26982 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945 Référence CVE CVE-2024-42230 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-025692Linux の Linux Kernel における有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、有効期限後のメモリの解放の欠如に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: b195d229de401377f70c04e0dff93b342464ec8e < 549de58dba4bf1b2adc72e9948b9c76fa88be9d2, 62d7ad2c191122119c66361ba6d9f04974b51afe < df27729a4fe0002dfd80c96fe1c142829c672728, 842801181864690fdcde73b017cce4c1353a7083 < f5dc10b910bdac523e5947336445a77066c51bf9, 37aa50c539bcbcc01767e515bd170787fcfc0f33 < 4c43069bb1097dd6cc1cf0f7c43a36d1f7b3910b, 37aa50c539bcbcc01767e515bd170787fcfc0f33 < 72a0b329114b1caa8e69dfa7cdad1dd3c69b8602, 5.4.291 < 5.4.292, 5.10.235 < 5.10.236, 5.15.142 < 5.15.180, 5.17
Fixed
Linux: < 5.17, 5.4.292 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.236 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.180 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.18.13 ≤ 5.18.*, 5.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:22 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-54596
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49636 · cve.blacktree.nl