BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49566High confidence

crypto: qat - fix memory leak in RSA

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 4 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-54666

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - fix memory leak in RSA When an RSA key represented in form 2 (as defined in PKCS #1 V2.1) is used, some components of the private key persist even after the TFM is released. Replace the explicit calls to free the buffers in qat_rsa_exit_tfm() with a call to qat_rsa_clear_ctx() which frees all buffers referenced in the TFM context.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - fix memory leak in RSA When an RSA key represented in form 2 (as defined in PKCS #1 V2.1) is used, some components of the private key persist even after the TFM is released. Replace the explicit calls to free the buffers in qat_rsa_exit_tfm() with a call to qat_rsa_clear_ctx() which frees all buffers referenced in the TFM context.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - fix memory leak in RSA When an RSA key represented in form 2 (as defined in PKCS #1 V2.1) is used, some components of the private key persist even after the TFM is released. Replace the explicit calls to free the buffers in qat_rsa_exit_tfm() with a call to qat_rsa_clear_ctx() which frees all buffers referenced in the TFM context.

Why

The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-401

CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime. The product does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory after it has been used, making the memory unavailable for reallocation and reuse.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-401
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49552 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49555 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49556 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49559 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49560 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49562 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49563 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49565 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49566 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49569 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49570 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49578 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49578 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49579 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49581 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49583 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49552 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49555 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49556 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49559 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49560 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49560 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49562 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49563 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49565 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49565 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49566 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49569 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49570 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49579 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49581 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49583 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49584 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49546 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49549 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49549 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49551 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49551 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49555 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49555 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49556 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49556 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49559 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49559 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49562 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49562 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49563 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49566 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49566 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49568 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49568 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49569 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49569 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49570 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49570 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49579 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49579 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49581 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49581 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49583 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49583 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49584 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49584 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49591 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
879f77e9071f029e1c9bd5a75814ecf51370f846 < a843925e0287eebb4aa808666bf22c664dfe4c53; 879f77e9071f029e1c9bd5a75814ecf51370f846 < 0f967fdc09955221a1951a279481b0bf4d359941; 879f77e9071f029e1c9bd5a75814ecf51370f846 < 80a52e1ee7757b742f96bfb0d58f0c14eb6583d0; 4.8
Fixed
< 4.8; 5.15.58 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.18.15 ≤ 5.18.*; 5.19 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 19:02 UTC · CWE-401 · Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-54666
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49566 · cve.blacktree.nl