BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49519High confidence

ath10k: skip ath10k_halt during suspend for driver state RESTARTING

Linux · Linux

8.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:High, unchanged from published severity.unchanged

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • EPSS is 0.35% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: Within 30 daysRemediation target: Within 180 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2022-49519 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 61 · interimSUSE Product Security TeamCVE-2022-49519
210 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel-default as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-base as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default-man as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-devel as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-macros as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-source as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP2
  • kernel-default as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP4
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ath10k: skip ath10k_halt during suspend for driver state RESTARTING Double free crash is observed when FW recovery(caused by wmi timeout/crash) is followed by immediate suspend event. The FW recovery is triggered by ath10k_core_restart() which calls driver clean up via ath10k_halt(). When the suspend event occurs between the FW recovery, the restart worker thread is put into frozen state until suspend completes. The suspend event triggers ath10k_stop() which again triggers ath10k_halt() The double invocation of ath10k_halt() causes ath10k_htt_rx_free() to be called twice(Note: ath10k_htt_rx_alloc was not called by restart worker thread because of its frozen state), causing the crash. To fix this, during the suspend flow, skip call to ath10k_halt() in ath10k_stop() when the current driver state is ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING. Also, for driver state ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING, call ath10k_wait_for_suspend() in ath10k_stop(). This is because call to ath10k_wait_for_suspend() is skipped later in [ath10k_halt() > ath10k_core_stop()] for the driver state ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING. The frozen restart worker thread will be cancelled during resume when the device comes out of suspend. Below is the crash stack for reference: [ 428.469167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 428.469180] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:4150! [ 428.469193] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 428.469219] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn [ 428.469230] RIP: 0010:kfree+0x319/0x31b [ 428.469241] RSP: 0018:ffffa1fac015fc30 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 428.469247] RAX: ffffedb10419d108 RBX: ffff8c05262b0000 [ 428.469252] RDX: ffff8c04a8c07000 RSI: 0000000000000000 [ 428.469256] RBP: ffffa1fac015fc78 R08: 0000000000000000 [ 428.469276] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 428.469285] Call Trace: [ 428.469295] ? dma_free_attrs+0x5f/0x7d [ 428.469320] ath10k_core_stop+0x5b/0x6f [ 428.469336] ath10k_halt+0x126/0x177 [ 428.469352] ath10k_stop+0x41/0x7e [ 428.469387] drv_stop+0x88/0x10e [ 428.469410] __ieee80211_suspend+0x297/0x411 [ 428.469441] rdev_suspend+0x6e/0xd0 [ 428.469462] wiphy_suspend+0xb1/0x105 [ 428.469483] ? name_show+0x2d/0x2d [ 428.469490] dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x126 [ 428.469511] ? name_show+0x2d/0x2d [ 428.469517] __device_suspend+0x2e7/0x41b [ 428.469523] async_suspend+0x1f/0x93 [ 428.469529] async_run_entry_fn+0x3d/0xd1 [ 428.469535] process_one_work+0x1b1/0x329 [ 428.469541] worker_thread+0x213/0x372 [ 428.469547] kthread+0x150/0x15f [ 428.469552] ? pr_cont_work+0x58/0x58 [ 428.469558] ? kthread_blkcg+0x31/0x31 Tested-on: QCA6174 hw3.2 PCI WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00288-QCARMSWPZ-1
Remediation
To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-54710

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ath10k: skip ath10k_halt during suspend for driver state RESTARTING Double free crash is observed when FW recovery(caused by wmi timeout/crash) is followed by immediate suspend event. The FW recovery is triggered by ath10k_core_restart() which calls driver clean up via ath10k_halt(). When the suspend event occurs between the FW recovery, the restart worker thread is put into frozen state until suspend completes. The suspend event triggers ath10k_stop() which again triggers ath10k_halt() The double invocation of ath10k_halt() causes ath10k_htt_rx_free() to be called twice(Note: ath10k_htt_rx_alloc was not called by restart worker thread because of its frozen state), causing the crash. To fix this, during the suspend flow, skip call to ath10k_halt() in ath10k_stop() when the current driver state is ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING. Also, for driver state ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING, call ath10k_wait_for_suspend() in ath10k_stop(). This is because call to ath10k_wait_for_suspend() is skipped later in [ath10k_halt() > ath10k_core_stop()] for the driver state ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING. The frozen restart worker thread will be cancelled during resume when the device comes out of suspend. Below is the crash stack for reference: [ 428.469167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 428.469180] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:4150! [ 428.469193] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 428.469219] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn [ 428.469230] RIP: 0010:kfree+0x319/0x31b [ 428.469241] RSP: 0018:ffffa1fac015fc30 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 428.469247] RAX: ffffedb10419d108 RBX: ffff8c05262b0000 [ 428.469252] RDX: ffff8c04a8c07000 RSI: 0000000000000000 [ 428.469256] RBP: ffffa1fac015fc78 R08: 0000000000000000 [ 428.469276] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 428.469285] Call Trace: [ 428.469295] ? dma_free_attrs+0x5f/0x7d [ 428.469320] ath10k_core_stop+0x5b/0x6f [ 428.469336] ath10k_halt+0x126/0x177 [ 428.469352] ath10k_stop+0x41/0x7e [ 428.469387] drv_stop+0x88/0x10e [ 428.469410] __ieee80211_suspend+0x297/0x411 [ 428.469441] rdev_suspend+0x6e/0xd0 [ 428.469462] wiphy_suspend+0xb1/0x105 [ 428.469483] ? name_show+0x2d/0x2d [ 428.469490] dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x126 [ 428.469511] ? name_show+0x2d/0x2d [ 428.469517] __device_suspend+0x2e7/0x41b [ 428.469523] async_suspend+0x1f/0x93 [ 428.469529] async_run_entry_fn+0x3d/0xd1 [ 428.469535] process_one_work+0x1b1/0x329 [ 428.469541] worker_thread+0x213/0x372 [ 428.469547] kthread+0x150/0x15f [ 428.469552] ? pr_cont_work+0x58/0x58 [ 428.469558] ? kthread_blkcg+0x31/0x31 Tested-on: QCA6174 hw3.2 PCI WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00288-QCARMSWPZ-1

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ath10k: skip ath10k_halt during suspend for driver state RESTARTING Double free crash is observed when FW recovery(caused by wmi timeout/crash) is followed by immediate suspend event. The FW recovery is triggered by ath10k_core_restart() which calls driver clean up via ath10k_halt(). When the suspend event occurs between the FW recovery, the restart worker thread is put into frozen state until suspend completes. The suspend event triggers ath10k_stop() which again triggers ath10k_halt() The double invocation of ath10k_halt() causes ath10k_htt_rx_free() to be called twice(Note: ath10k_htt_rx_alloc was not called by restart worker thread because of its frozen state), causing the crash. To fix this, during the suspend flow, skip call to ath10k_halt() in ath10k_stop() when the current driver state is ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING. Also, for driver state ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING, call ath10k_wait_for_suspend() in ath10k_stop(). This is because call to ath10k_wait_for_suspend() is skipped later in [ath10k_halt() > ath10k_core_stop()] for the driver state ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING. The frozen restart worker thread will be cancelled during resume when the device comes out of suspend. Below is the crash stack for reference: [ 428.469167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 428.469180] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:4150! [ 428.469193] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 428.469219] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn [ 428.469230] RIP: 0010:kfree+0x319/0x31b [ 428.469241] RSP: 0018:ffffa1fac015fc30 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 428.469247] RAX: ffffedb10419d108 RBX: ffff8c05262b0000 [ 428.469252] RDX: ffff8c04a8c07000 RSI: 0000000000000000 [ 428.469256] RBP: ffffa1fac015fc78 R08: 0000000000000000 [ 428.469276] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 428.469285] Call Trace: [ 428.469295] ? dma_free_attrs+0x5f/0x7d [ 428.469320] ath10k_core_stop+0x5b/0x6f [ 428.469336] ath10k_halt+0x126/0x177 [ 428.469352] ath10k_stop+0x41/0x7e [ 428.469387] drv_stop+0x88/0x10e [ 428.469410] __ieee80211_suspend+0x297/0x411 [ 428.469441] rdev_suspend+0x6e/0xd0 [ 428.469462] wiphy_suspend+0xb1/0x105 [ 428.469483] ? name_show+0x2d/0x2d [ 428.469490] dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x126 [ 428.469511] ? name_show+0x2d/0x2d [ 428.469517] __device_suspend+0x2e7/0x41b [ 428.469523] async_suspend+0x1f/0x93 [ 428.469529] async_run_entry_fn+0x3d/0xd1 [ 428.469535] process_one_work+0x1b1/0x329 [ 428.469541] worker_thread+0x213/0x372 [ 428.469547] kthread+0x150/0x15f [ 428.469552] ? pr_cont_work+0x58/0x58 [ 428.469558] ? kthread_blkcg+0x31/0x31 Tested-on: QCA6174 hw3.2 PCI WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00288-QCARMSWPZ-1

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ath10k: skip ath10k_halt during suspend for driver state RESTARTING Double free crash is observed when FW recovery(caused by wmi timeout/crash) is followed by immediate suspend event. The FW recovery is triggered by ath10k_core_restart() which calls driver clean up via ath10k_halt(). When the suspend event occurs between the FW recovery, the restart worker thread is put into frozen state until suspend completes. The suspend event triggers ath10k_stop() which again triggers ath10k_halt() The double invocation of ath10k_halt() causes ath10k_htt_rx_free() to be called twice(Note: ath10k_htt_rx_alloc was not called by restart worker thread because of its frozen state), causing the crash. To fix this, during the suspend flow, skip call to ath10k_halt() in ath10k_stop() when the current driver state is ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING. Also, for driver state ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING, call ath10k_wait_for_suspend() in ath10k_stop(). This is because call to ath10k_wait_for_suspend() is skipped later in [ath10k_halt() > ath10k_core_stop()] for the driver state ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTING. The frozen restart worker thread will be cancelled during resume when the device comes out of suspend. Below is the crash stack for reference: [ 428.469167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 428.469180] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:4150! [ 428.469193] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 428.469219] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn [ 428.469230] RIP: 0010:kfree+0x319/0x31b [ 428.469241] RSP: 0018:ffffa1fac015fc30 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 428.469247] RAX: ffffedb10419d108 RBX: ffff8c05262b0000 [ 428.469252] RDX: ffff8c04a8c07000 RSI: 0000000000000000 [ 428.469256] RBP: ffffa1fac015fc78 R08: 0000000000000000 [ 428.469276] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 428.469285] Call Trace: [ 428.469295] ? dma_free_attrs+0x5f/0x7d [ 428.469320] ath10k_core_stop+0x5b/0x6f [ 428.469336] ath10k_halt+0x126/0x177 [ 428.469352] ath10k_stop+0x41/0x7e [ 428.469387] drv_stop+0x88/0x10e [ 428.469410] __ieee80211_suspend+0x297/0x411 [ 428.469441] rdev_suspend+0x6e/0xd0 [ 428.469462] wiphy_suspend+0xb1/0x105 [ 428.469483] ? name_show+0x2d/0x2d [ 428.469490] dpm_run_callback+0x8c/0x126 [ 428.469511] ? name_show+0x2d/0x2d [ 428.469517] __device_suspend+0x2e7/0x41b [ 428.469523] async_suspend+0x1f/0x93 [ 428.469529] async_run_entry_fn+0x3d/0xd1 [ 428.469535] process_one_work+0x1b1/0x329 [ 428.469541] worker_thread+0x213/0x372 [ 428.469547] kthread+0x150/0x15f [ 428.469552] ? pr_cont_work+0x58/0x58 [ 428.469558] ? kthread_blkcg+0x31/0x31 Tested-on: QCA6174 hw3.2 PCI WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00288-QCARMSWPZ-1

Why

The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

How

An attacker operating through an adjacent network may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may disrupt the affected service.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
an adjacent network → Double Free → disrupt the affected service
Attack surface
Adjacent
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-415 ↗

CWE-415: Double Free. The product calls free() twice on the same memory address.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVAdjacentAttack vector: The attacker must be on an adjacent or logically close network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
UnauthenticatedDenial of serviceCWE-415
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250305Security Bulletin 5 March 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 March 2025, published on 5 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-49481 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49486 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49486 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49492 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49492 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49498 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49498 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49503 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49503 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49508 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49511 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49519 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49520 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49521 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49523 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49526 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49532 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49532 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49538 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49538 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49545 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49545 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49548 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49510 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49511 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49512 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49513 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49513 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49514 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49516 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49517 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49519 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49520 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49521 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49522 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49523 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49524 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49525 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49526 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49509 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49510 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49510 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49511 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49512 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49514 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49516 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49516 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49517 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49518 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49519 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49520 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49521 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49522 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49523 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49524 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49525 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49526 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49505 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49506 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49506 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49507 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49507 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49508 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49508 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49509 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49509 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49512 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49512 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49514 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49514 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49515 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49515 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49517 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49517 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49519 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49519 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49520 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49520 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49521 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49521 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49522 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49522 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49523 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49523 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49524 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49524 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49525 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49525 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49526 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49526 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49527 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-026571Linux の Linux Kernel における二重解放に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、二重解放に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 4.10, 5.10.121 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.46 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.17.14 ≤ 5.17.*, 5.18.3 ≤ 5.18.*, 5.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 15 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC · CWE-415 · Double Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-54710
Product sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · SUSE Product Security Team
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗
  1. Affected versionsThe structured affected or fixed version information changed.
    Before
    5e3dd157d7e70f0e3cea3f2573ed69fb156a19d5 < 8aa3750986ffcf73e0692db3b40dd3a8e8c0c575; 5e3dd157d7e70f0e3cea3f2573ed69fb156a19d5 < c2272428090d0d215a3f017cbbbad731c07eee53; 5e3dd157d7e70f0e3cea3f2573ed69fb156a19d5 < 7eb14cb604f49e58b7cf6faa87961a865a3c8649; 5e3dd157d7e70f0e3cea3f2573ed69fb156a19d5 < 5321e5211b5dc873e2e3d0deb749e69ecf4dbfe5; 5e3dd157d7e70f0e3cea3f2573ed69fb156a19d5 < b72a4aff947ba807177bdabb43debaf2c66bee05; 3.11 · Fixed: < 3.11; 5.10.121 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.46 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.17.14 ≤ 5.17.*; 5.18.3 ≤ 5.18.*; 5.19 ≤ *
    After
    c2cac2f74ab4bcf0db0dcf3a612f1e5b52d145c8 < 8aa3750986ffcf73e0692db3b40dd3a8e8c0c575; c2cac2f74ab4bcf0db0dcf3a612f1e5b52d145c8 < c2272428090d0d215a3f017cbbbad731c07eee53; c2cac2f74ab4bcf0db0dcf3a612f1e5b52d145c8 < 7eb14cb604f49e58b7cf6faa87961a865a3c8649; c2cac2f74ab4bcf0db0dcf3a612f1e5b52d145c8 < 5321e5211b5dc873e2e3d0deb749e69ecf4dbfe5; c2cac2f74ab4bcf0db0dcf3a612f1e5b52d145c8 < b72a4aff947ba807177bdabb43debaf2c66bee05; ea23fca0c60045afbbeceef1926893d905eb1b36; 4.9.2 < 4.10; 4.10 · Fixed: < 4.10; 5.10.121 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.46 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.17.14 ≤ 5.17.*; 5.18.3 ≤ 5.18.*; 5.19 ≤ *
    CNA ↗
Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49519 · cve.blacktree.nl