BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49433High confidence

RDMA/hfi1: Prevent use of lock before it is initialized

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-54796

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hfi1: Prevent use of lock before it is initialized If there is a failure during probe of hfi1 before the sdma_map_lock is initialized, the call to hfi1_free_devdata() will attempt to use a lock that has not been initialized. If the locking correctness validator is on then an INFO message and stack trace resembling the following may be seen: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. Call Trace: register_lock_class+0x11b/0x880 __lock_acquire+0xf3/0x7930 lock_acquire+0xff/0x2d0 _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x46/0x60 sdma_clean+0x42a/0x660 [hfi1] hfi1_free_devdata+0x3a7/0x420 [hfi1] init_one+0x867/0x11a0 [hfi1] pci_device_probe+0x40e/0x8d0 The use of sdma_map_lock in sdma_clean() is for freeing the sdma_map memory, and sdma_map is not allocated/initialized until after sdma_map_lock has been initialized. This code only needs to be run if sdma_map is not NULL, and so checking for that condition will avoid trying to use the lock before it is initialized.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hfi1: Prevent use of lock before it is initialized If there is a failure during probe of hfi1 before the sdma_map_lock is initialized, the call to hfi1_free_devdata() will attempt to use a lock that has not been initialized. If the locking correctness validator is on then an INFO message and stack trace resembling the following may be seen: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. Call Trace: register_lock_class+0x11b/0x880 __lock_acquire+0xf3/0x7930 lock_acquire+0xff/0x2d0 _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x46/0x60 sdma_clean+0x42a/0x660 [hfi1] hfi1_free_devdata+0x3a7/0x420 [hfi1] init_one+0x867/0x11a0 [hfi1] pci_device_probe+0x40e/0x8d0 The use of sdma_map_lock in sdma_clean() is for freeing the sdma_map memory, and sdma_map is not allocated/initialized until after sdma_map_lock has been initialized. This code only needs to be run if sdma_map is not NULL, and so checking for that condition will avoid trying to use the lock before it is initialized.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hfi1: Prevent use of lock before it is initialized If there is a failure during probe of hfi1 before the sdma_map_lock is initialized, the call to hfi1_free_devdata() will attempt to use a lock that has not been initialized. If the locking correctness validator is on then an INFO message and stack trace resembling the following may be seen: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. Call Trace: register_lock_class+0x11b/0x880 __lock_acquire+0xf3/0x7930 lock_acquire+0xff/0x2d0 _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x46/0x60 sdma_clean+0x42a/0x660 [hfi1] hfi1_free_devdata+0x3a7/0x420 [hfi1] init_one+0x867/0x11a0 [hfi1] pci_device_probe+0x40e/0x8d0 The use of sdma_map_lock in sdma_clean() is for freeing the sdma_map memory, and sdma_map is not allocated/initialized until after sdma_map_lock has been initialized. This code only needs to be run if sdma_map is not NULL, and so checking for that condition will avoid trying to use the lock before it is initialized.

Why

The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use of Uninitialized Resource → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-908

CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource. The product uses or accesses a resource that has not been initialized.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-908
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-49401 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49402 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49403 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49404 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49406 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49407 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49409 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49422 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49432 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49433 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49436 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49441 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49446 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49446 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49447 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49447 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49450 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49450 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49455 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49455 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49468 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49421 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49422 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49424 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49426 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49427 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49429 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49430 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49431 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49432 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49433 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49435 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49436 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49437 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49438 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49440 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49441 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49421 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49422 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49424 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49426 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49427 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49429 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49430 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49431 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49432 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49433 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49435 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49436 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49436 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49437 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49438 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49440 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49441 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49421 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49422 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49422 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49424 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49424 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49426 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49426 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49427 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49427 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49429 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49429 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49430 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49430 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49431 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49431 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49432 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49432 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49433 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49433 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49434 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49434 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49435 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49435 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49437 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49437 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49438 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49438 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49440 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49440 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49441 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49441 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49442 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49442 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49443 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
7724105686e718ac476a6ad3304fea2fbcfcffde < 66090815a24ce14cf51ef5453fc0218fe8a39bc2; 7724105686e718ac476a6ad3304fea2fbcfcffde < addb192000d8819c0b1553453994df9bb54c28db; 7724105686e718ac476a6ad3304fea2fbcfcffde < fc0750e659db7b315bf6348902cc8ca3cdd4b8d8; 7724105686e718ac476a6ad3304fea2fbcfcffde < ca55150bff5817af4f857a746ecab9862c23e12a; 7724105686e718ac476a6ad3304fea2fbcfcffde < 30eb275e7ed588270ae159cc590a96658e0cfd8f; 7724105686e718ac476a6ad3304fea2fbcfcffde < 288d198f50434f29b4a26a9de4394ae2305ad8af; 7724105686e718ac476a6ad3304fea2fbcfcffde < 05c03dfd09c069c4ffd783b47b2da5dcc9421f2c; 4.3
Fixed
< 4.3; 4.19.247 ≤ 4.19.*; 5.4.198 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.121 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.46 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.17.14 ≤ 5.17.*; 5.18.3 ≤ 5.18.*; 5.19 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 18:59 UTC · CWE-908 · Use of Uninitialized Resource

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-54796
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49433 · cve.blacktree.nl