BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49394High confidence

blk-iolatency: Fix inflight count imbalances and IO hangs on offline

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 10 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-54835

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-iolatency: Fix inflight count imbalances and IO hangs on offline iolatency needs to track the number of inflight IOs per cgroup. As this tracking can be expensive, it is disabled when no cgroup has iolatency configured for the device. To ensure that the inflight counters stay balanced, iolatency_set_limit() freezes the request_queue while manipulating the enabled counter, which ensures that no IO is in flight and thus all counters are zero. Unfortunately, iolatency_set_limit() isn't the only place where the enabled counter is manipulated. iolatency_pd_offline() can also dec the counter and trigger disabling. As this disabling happens without freezing the q, this can easily happen while some IOs are in flight and thus leak the counts. This can be easily demonstrated by turning on iolatency on an one empty cgroup while IOs are in flight in other cgroups and then removing the cgroup. Note that iolatency shouldn't have been enabled elsewhere in the system to ensure that removing the cgroup disables iolatency for the whole device. The following keeps flipping on and off iolatency on sda: echo +io > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control while true; do mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/test echo '8:0 target=100000' > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/io.latency sleep 1 rmdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test sleep 1 done and there's concurrent fio generating direct rand reads: fio --name test --filename=/dev/sda --direct=1 --rw=randread \ --runtime=600 --time_based --iodepth=256 --numjobs=4 --bs=4k while monitoring with the following drgn script: while True: for css in css_for_each_descendant_pre(prog['blkcg_root'].css.address_of_()): for pos in hlist_for_each(container_of(css, 'struct blkcg', 'css').blkg_list): blkg = container_of(pos, 'struct blkcg_gq', 'blkcg_node') pd = blkg.pd[prog['blkcg_policy_iolatency'].plid] if pd.value_() == 0: continue iolat = container_of(pd, 'struct iolatency_grp', 'pd') inflight = iolat.rq_wait.inflight.counter.value_() if inflight: print(f'inflight={inflight} {disk_name(blkg.q.disk).decode("utf-8")} ' f'{cgroup_path(css.cgroup).decode("utf-8")}') time.sleep(1) The monitoring output looks like the following: inflight=1 sda /user.slice inflight=1 sda /user.slice ... inflight=14 sda /user.slice inflight=13 sda /user.slice inflight=17 sda /user.slice inflight=15 sda /user.slice inflight=18 sda /user.slice inflight=17 sda /user.slice inflight=20 sda /user.slice inflight=19 sda /user.slice <- fio stopped, inflight stuck at 19 inflight=19 sda /user.slice inflight=19 sda /user.slice If a cgroup with stuck inflight ends up getting throttled, the throttled IOs will never get issued as there's no completion event to wake it up leading to an indefinite hang. This patch fixes the bug by unifying enable handling into a work item which is automatically kicked off from iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec() which is called from both iolatency_set_limit() and iolatency_pd_offline() paths. Punting to a work item is necessary as iolatency_pd_offline() is called under spinlocks while freezing a request_queue requires a sleepable context. This also simplifies the code reducing LOC sans the comments and avoids the unnecessary freezes which were happening whenever a cgroup's latency target is newly set or cleared.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-iolatency: Fix inflight count imbalances and IO hangs on offline iolatency needs to track the number of inflight IOs per cgroup. As this tracking can be expensive, it is disabled when no cgroup has iolatency configured for the device. To ensure that the inflight counters stay balanced, iolatency_set_limit() freezes the request_queue while manipulating the enabled counter, which ensures that no IO is in flight and thus all counters are zero. Unfortunately, iolatency_set_limit() isn't the only place where the enabled counter is manipulated. iolatency_pd_offline() can also dec the counter and trigger disabling. As this disabling happens without freezing the q, this can easily happen while some IOs are in flight and thus leak the counts. This can be easily demonstrated by turning on iolatency on an one empty cgroup while IOs are in flight in other cgroups and then removing the cgroup. Note that iolatency shouldn't have been enabled elsewhere in the system to ensure that removing the cgroup disables iolatency for the whole device. The following keeps flipping on and off iolatency on sda: echo +io > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control while true; do mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/test echo '8:0 target=100000' > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/io.latency sleep 1 rmdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test sleep 1 done and there's concurrent fio generating direct rand reads: fio --name test --filename=/dev/sda --direct=1 --rw=randread \ --runtime=600 --time_based --iodepth=256 --numjobs=4 --bs=4k while monitoring with the following drgn script: while True: for css in css_for_each_descendant_pre(prog['blkcg_root'].css.address_of_()): for pos in hlist_for_each(container_of(css, 'struct blkcg', 'css').blkg_list): blkg = container_of(pos, 'struct blkcg_gq', 'blkcg_node') pd = blkg.pd[prog['blkcg_policy_iolatency'].plid] if pd.value_() == 0: continue iolat = container_of(pd, 'struct iolatency_grp', 'pd') inflight = iolat.rq_wait.inflight.counter.value_() if inflight: print(f'inflight={inflight} {disk_name(blkg.q.disk).decode("utf-8")} ' f'{cgroup_path(css.cgroup).decode("utf-8")}') time.sleep(1) The monitoring output looks like the following: inflight=1 sda /user.slice inflight=1 sda /user.slice ... inflight=14 sda /user.slice inflight=13 sda /user.slice inflight=17 sda /user.slice inflight=15 sda /user.slice inflight=18 sda /user.slice inflight=17 sda /user.slice inflight=20 sda /user.slice inflight=19 sda /user.slice <- fio stopped, inflight stuck at 19 inflight=19 sda /user.slice inflight=19 sda /user.slice If a cgroup with stuck inflight ends up getting throttled, the throttled IOs will never get issued as there's no completion event to wake it up leading to an indefinite hang. This patch fixes the bug by unifying enable handling into a work item which is automatically kicked off from iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec() which is called from both iolatency_set_limit() and iolatency_pd_offline() paths. Punting to a work item is necessary as iolatency_pd_offline() is called under spinlocks while freezing a request_queue requires a sleepable context. This also simplifies the code reducing LOC sans the comments and avoids the unnecessary freezes which were happening whenever a cgroup's latency target is newly set or cleared.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-iolatency: Fix inflight count imbalances and IO hangs on offline iolatency needs to track the number of inflight IOs per cgroup. As this tracking can be expensive, it is disabled when no cgroup has iolatency configured for the device. To ensure that the inflight counters stay balanced, iolatency_set_limit() freezes the request_queue while manipulating the enabled counter, which ensures that no IO is in flight and thus all counters are zero. Unfortunately, iolatency_set_limit() isn't the only place where the enabled counter is manipulated. iolatency_pd_offline() can also dec the counter and trigger disabling. As this disabling happens without freezing the q, this can easily happen while some IOs are in flight and thus leak the counts. This can be easily demonstrated by turning on iolatency on an one empty cgroup while IOs are in flight in other cgroups and then removing the cgroup. Note that iolatency shouldn't have been enabled elsewhere in the system to ensure that removing the cgroup disables iolatency for the whole device. The following keeps flipping on and off iolatency on sda: echo +io > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control while true; do mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/test echo '8:0 target=100000' > /sys/fs/cgroup/test/io.latency sleep 1 rmdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test sleep 1 done and there's concurrent fio generating direct rand reads: fio --name test --filename=/dev/sda --direct=1 --rw=randread \ --runtime=600 --time_based --iodepth=256 --numjobs=4 --bs=4k while monitoring with the following drgn script: while True: for css in css_for_each_descendant_pre(prog['blkcg_root'].css.address_of_()): for pos in hlist_for_each(container_of(css, 'struct blkcg', 'css').blkg_list): blkg = container_of(pos, 'struct blkcg_gq', 'blkcg_node') pd = blkg.pd[prog['blkcg_policy_iolatency'].plid] if pd.value_() == 0: continue iolat = container_of(pd, 'struct iolatency_grp', 'pd') inflight = iolat.rq_wait.inflight.counter.value_() if inflight: print(f'inflight={inflight} {disk_name(blkg.q.disk).decode("utf-8")} ' f'{cgroup_path(css.cgroup).decode("utf-8")}') time.sleep(1) The monitoring output looks like the following: inflight=1 sda /user.slice inflight=1 sda /user.slice ... inflight=14 sda /user.slice inflight=13 sda /user.slice inflight=17 sda /user.slice inflight=15 sda /user.slice inflight=18 sda /user.slice inflight=17 sda /user.slice inflight=20 sda /user.slice inflight=19 sda /user.slice <- fio stopped, inflight stuck at 19 inflight=19 sda /user.slice inflight=19 sda /user.slice If a cgroup with stuck inflight ends up getting throttled, the throttled IOs will never get issued as there's no completion event to wake it up leading to an indefinite hang. This patch fixes the bug by unifying enable handling into a work item which is automatically kicked off from iolatency_set_min_lat_nsec() which is called from both iolatency_set_limit() and iolatency_pd_offline() paths. Punting to a work item is necessary as iolatency_pd_offline() is called under spinlocks while freezing a request_queue requires a sleepable context. This also simplifies the code reducing LOC sans the comments and avoids the unnecessary freezes which were happening whenever a cgroup's latency target is newly set or cleared.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-49353 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49356 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49357 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49357 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49372 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49372 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49374 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49374 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49376 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49376 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49378 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49378 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49379 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49384 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49394 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49400 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49401 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49401 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49402 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49403 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49403 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49404 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49406 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49407 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49409 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49381 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49382 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49384 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49385 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49386 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49388 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49388 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49389 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49390 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49392 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49394 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49395 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49395 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49396 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49397 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49398 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49399 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49400 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49402 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49379 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49381 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49382 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49384 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49385 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49386 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49389 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49390 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49390 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49392 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49394 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49396 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49397 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49398 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49399 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49400 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49402 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49404 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49406 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49378 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49379 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49379 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49381 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49381 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49382 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49382 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49384 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49384 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49385 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49385 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49386 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49386 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49389 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49389 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49392 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49392 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49394 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49394 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49396 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49396 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49397 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49397 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49398 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49398 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49399 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49399 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49400 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49400 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49402 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49402 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49404 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49404 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49407 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
6d482bc5697763eb1214f207286daa201b32d20a < 515d077ee3085ae343b6bea7fd031f9906645f38; 8c772a9bfc7c07c76f4a58b58910452fbb20843b < d19fa8f252000d141f9199ca32959c50314e1f05; 8c772a9bfc7c07c76f4a58b58910452fbb20843b < 77692c02e1517c54f2fd0535f41aa4286ac9f140; 8c772a9bfc7c07c76f4a58b58910452fbb20843b < a30acbb5dfb7bcc813ad6a18ca31011ac44e5547; 8c772a9bfc7c07c76f4a58b58910452fbb20843b < 968f7a239c590454ffba79c126fbe0e963a0ba78; 8c772a9bfc7c07c76f4a58b58910452fbb20843b < 5b0ff3ebbef791341695b718f8d2870869cf1d01; 8c772a9bfc7c07c76f4a58b58910452fbb20843b < 8a177a36da6c54c98b8685d4f914cb3637d53c0d; beed6109acd4efc2f1717c31bddcd0ad7ebbf253
Fixed
< 5.0; 4.19.247 ≤ 4.19.*; 5.4.198 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.121 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.46 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.17.14 ≤ 5.17.*; 5.18.3 ≤ 5.18.*; 5.19 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 23 May 2026, 15:22 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-54835
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49394 · cve.blacktree.nl