BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49339High confidence

net: ipv6: unexport __init-annotated seg6_hmac_init()

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-54889

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ipv6: unexport __init-annotated seg6_hmac_init() EXPORT_SYMBOL and __init is a bad combination because the .init.text section is freed up after the initialization. Hence, modules cannot use symbols annotated __init. The access to a freed symbol may end up with kernel panic. modpost used to detect it, but it has been broken for a decade. Recently, I fixed modpost so it started to warn it again, then this showed up in linux-next builds. There are two ways to fix it: - Remove __init - Remove EXPORT_SYMBOL I chose the latter for this case because the caller (net/ipv6/seg6.c) and the callee (net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c) belong to the same module. It seems an internal function call in ipv6.ko.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ipv6: unexport __init-annotated seg6_hmac_init() EXPORT_SYMBOL and __init is a bad combination because the .init.text section is freed up after the initialization. Hence, modules cannot use symbols annotated __init. The access to a freed symbol may end up with kernel panic. modpost used to detect it, but it has been broken for a decade. Recently, I fixed modpost so it started to warn it again, then this showed up in linux-next builds. There are two ways to fix it: - Remove __init - Remove EXPORT_SYMBOL I chose the latter for this case because the caller (net/ipv6/seg6.c) and the callee (net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c) belong to the same module. It seems an internal function call in ipv6.ko.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ipv6: unexport __init-annotated seg6_hmac_init() EXPORT_SYMBOL and __init is a bad combination because the .init.text section is freed up after the initialization. Hence, modules cannot use symbols annotated __init. The access to a freed symbol may end up with kernel panic. modpost used to detect it, but it has been broken for a decade. Recently, I fixed modpost so it started to warn it again, then this showed up in linux-next builds. There are two ways to fix it: - Remove __init - Remove EXPORT_SYMBOL I chose the latter for this case because the caller (net/ipv6/seg6.c) and the callee (net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c) belong to the same module. It seems an internal function call in ipv6.ko.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2025-2107Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder nicht näher beschriebene Auswirkungen zu erzielen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-49290 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49297 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49307 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49308 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49321 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49322 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49323 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49330 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49334 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49339 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49340 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49341 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49343 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49345 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49350 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49350 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49352 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49352 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49353 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49353 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49356 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49329 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49330 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49331 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49332 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49333 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49335 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49336 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49337 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49338 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49339 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49341 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49342 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49343 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49344 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49344 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49345 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49346 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49347 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49329 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49330 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49331 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49332 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49333 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49333 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49335 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49336 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49337 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49338 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49338 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49339 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49341 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49342 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49343 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49345 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49346 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49347 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49348 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49323 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49326 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49327 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49328 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49331 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49332 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49335 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49336 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49337 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49337 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49339 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49341 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49342 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49342 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49343 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49345 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49346 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49346 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49347 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49347 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49348 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49348 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49349 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
bf355b8d2c30a289232042cacc1cfaea4923936c < 64aef8efe96c1616142c4476a05731306fc4494e; bf355b8d2c30a289232042cacc1cfaea4923936c < ab8b2c2de273ec1d698a18e399896a6febb5cda0; bf355b8d2c30a289232042cacc1cfaea4923936c < 317260b3eb6384a05a8af212308fa50f3b2e8290; bf355b8d2c30a289232042cacc1cfaea4923936c < 5d9c1b081ad28c852a97e10dd75412546497694a; bf355b8d2c30a289232042cacc1cfaea4923936c < 1084716f76c8045eadf92a9d9a62641f3c8d8c90; bf355b8d2c30a289232042cacc1cfaea4923936c < 3e6de5037148c5a93a436b1e8d2edad3dac11755; bf355b8d2c30a289232042cacc1cfaea4923936c < 9ba4416b831eeb4d185e88e73488d1d21288e63a; bf355b8d2c30a289232042cacc1cfaea4923936c < 5801f064e35181c71857a80ff18af4dbec3c5f5c
Fixed
< 4.10; 4.14.283 ≤ 4.14.*; 4.19.247 ≤ 4.19.*; 5.4.198 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.122 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.47 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.17.15 ≤ 5.17.*; 5.18.4 ≤ 5.18.*
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 18:57 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-54889
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49339 · cve.blacktree.nl