BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49322High confidence

tracing: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context on RT kernel

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.21% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.18.5-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-54905

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context on RT kernel When setting bootparams="trace_event=initcall:initcall_start tp_printk=1" in the cmdline, the output_printk() was called, and the spin_lock_irqsave() was called in the atomic and irq disable interrupt context suitation. On the PREEMPT_RT kernel, these locks are replaced with sleepable rt-spinlock, so the stack calltrace will be triggered. Fix it by raw_spin_lock_irqsave when PREEMPT_RT and "trace_event=initcall:initcall_start tp_printk=1" enabled. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0 preempt_count: 2, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffff8992303e>] try_to_wake_up+0x7e/0xba0 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.1-rt17+ #19 34c5812404187a875f32bee7977f7367f9679ea7 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x8c dump_stack+0x10/0x12 __might_resched.cold+0x11d/0x155 rt_spin_lock+0x40/0x70 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x2fa/0x4c0 ? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93 trace_event_raw_event_initcall_start+0xbe/0x110 ? perf_trace_initcall_finish+0x210/0x210 ? probe_sched_wakeup+0x34/0x40 ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0xda/0x310 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x35/0x170 ? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93 do_one_initcall+0x217/0x3c0 ? trace_event_raw_event_initcall_level+0x170/0x170 ? push_cpu_stop+0x400/0x400 ? cblist_init_generic+0x241/0x290 kernel_init_freeable+0x1ac/0x347 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x65/0x80 ? rest_init+0xf0/0xf0 kernel_init+0x1e/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK>

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context on RT kernel When setting bootparams="trace_event=initcall:initcall_start tp_printk=1" in the cmdline, the output_printk() was called, and the spin_lock_irqsave() was called in the atomic and irq disable interrupt context suitation. On the PREEMPT_RT kernel, these locks are replaced with sleepable rt-spinlock, so the stack calltrace will be triggered. Fix it by raw_spin_lock_irqsave when PREEMPT_RT and "trace_event=initcall:initcall_start tp_printk=1" enabled. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0 preempt_count: 2, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffff8992303e>] try_to_wake_up+0x7e/0xba0 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.1-rt17+ #19 34c5812404187a875f32bee7977f7367f9679ea7 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x8c dump_stack+0x10/0x12 __might_resched.cold+0x11d/0x155 rt_spin_lock+0x40/0x70 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x2fa/0x4c0 ? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93 trace_event_raw_event_initcall_start+0xbe/0x110 ? perf_trace_initcall_finish+0x210/0x210 ? probe_sched_wakeup+0x34/0x40 ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0xda/0x310 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x35/0x170 ? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93 do_one_initcall+0x217/0x3c0 ? trace_event_raw_event_initcall_level+0x170/0x170 ? push_cpu_stop+0x400/0x400 ? cblist_init_generic+0x241/0x290 kernel_init_freeable+0x1ac/0x347 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x65/0x80 ? rest_init+0xf0/0xf0 kernel_init+0x1e/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK>

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context on RT kernel When setting bootparams="trace_event=initcall:initcall_start tp_printk=1" in the cmdline, the output_printk() was called, and the spin_lock_irqsave() was called in the atomic and irq disable interrupt context suitation. On the PREEMPT_RT kernel, these locks are replaced with sleepable rt-spinlock, so the stack calltrace will be triggered. Fix it by raw_spin_lock_irqsave when PREEMPT_RT and "trace_event=initcall:initcall_start tp_printk=1" enabled. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0 preempt_count: 2, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffff8992303e>] try_to_wake_up+0x7e/0xba0 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.1-rt17+ #19 34c5812404187a875f32bee7977f7367f9679ea7 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x8c dump_stack+0x10/0x12 __might_resched.cold+0x11d/0x155 rt_spin_lock+0x40/0x70 trace_event_buffer_commit+0x2fa/0x4c0 ? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93 trace_event_raw_event_initcall_start+0xbe/0x110 ? perf_trace_initcall_finish+0x210/0x210 ? probe_sched_wakeup+0x34/0x40 ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0xda/0x310 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x35/0x170 ? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93 do_one_initcall+0x217/0x3c0 ? trace_event_raw_event_initcall_level+0x170/0x170 ? push_cpu_stop+0x400/0x400 ? cblist_init_generic+0x241/0x290 kernel_init_freeable+0x1ac/0x347 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x65/0x80 ? rest_init+0xf0/0xf0 kernel_init+0x1e/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK>

Why

The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Improper Locking → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-667 ↗

CWE-667: Improper Locking. The product does not properly acquire or release a lock on a resource, leading to unexpected resource state changes and behaviors.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-667
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20250305Security Bulletin 5 March 2025

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 5 March 2025, published on 5 March 2025. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-49272 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49273 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49279 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49286 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49290 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49297 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49297 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49307 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49307 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49308 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49308 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49321 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49322 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49323 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49330 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49334 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49334 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49339 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49339 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49340 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49340 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49341 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49341 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49343 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49343 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49345 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49311 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49312 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49313 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49314 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49315 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49316 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49319 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49320 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49321 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49322 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49323 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49325 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49326 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49327 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49328 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49329 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49330 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49311 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49312 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49313 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49314 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49315 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49316 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49319 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49320 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49321 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49322 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49323 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49325 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49325 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49326 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49327 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49328 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49329 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49329 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49330 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49330 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49311 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49312 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49312 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49313 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49313 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49314 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49314 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49315 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49315 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49316 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49316 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49319 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49319 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49320 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49320 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49321 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49321 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49322 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49322 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49323 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49323 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49326 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49326 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49327 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49327 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49328 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49328 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49331 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49331 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49332 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49332 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49335 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49335 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49336 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-026047Linux の Linux Kernel におけるリソースのロックに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、リソースのロックに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 0daa2302968c13b657118d6ac92471f8fd2f3f28 < be1f323fb9d9b14a505ca22d742d321769454de1, 0daa2302968c13b657118d6ac92471f8fd2f3f28 < 40f9fde06b25884baa0c4bd138b909a9b67218b4, 0daa2302968c13b657118d6ac92471f8fd2f3f28 < 48c6ee7d6c614f09b2c8553a95eefef6ecf196e0, 0daa2302968c13b657118d6ac92471f8fd2f3f28 < 1788e6dbb61286215442b1af99e51405a6206762, 0daa2302968c13b657118d6ac92471f8fd2f3f28 < 9b534640a2c6a8d88168febc82ec6d161184f2ec, 0daa2302968c13b657118d6ac92471f8fd2f3f28 < 43bfc4dccc416c964b53cbdc430e814f8b6f770b, 0daa2302968c13b657118d6ac92471f8fd2f3f28 < 9abf3db8bdb63ab545034148ef2118f4d088ca59, 0daa2302968c13b657118d6ac92471f8fd2f3f28 < 12025abdc8539ed9d5014e2d647a3fd1bd3de5cd, 3.19
Fixed
Linux: < 3.19, 4.14.283 ≤ 4.14.*, 4.19.247 ≤ 4.19.*, 5.4.198 ≤ 5.4.*, 5.10.122 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.47 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.17.15 ≤ 5.17.*, 5.18.4 ≤ 5.18.*, 5.19 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 18:57 UTC · CWE-667 · Improper Locking

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-54905
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceCISA ADP
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49322 · cve.blacktree.nl