BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49264High confidence

exec: Force single empty string when argv is empty

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-54962

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exec: Force single empty string when argv is empty Quoting[1] Ariadne Conill: "In several other operating systems, it is a hard requirement that the second argument to execve(2) be the name of a program, thus prohibiting a scenario where argc < 1. POSIX 2017 also recommends this behaviour, but it is not an explicit requirement[2]: The argument arg0 should point to a filename string that is associated with the process being started by one of the exec functions. ... Interestingly, Michael Kerrisk opened an issue about this in 2008[3], but there was no consensus to support fixing this issue then. Hopefully now that CVE-2021-4034 shows practical exploitative use[4] of this bug in a shellcode, we can reconsider. This issue is being tracked in the KSPP issue tracker[5]." While the initial code searches[6][7] turned up what appeared to be mostly corner case tests, trying to that just reject argv == NULL (or an immediately terminated pointer list) quickly started tripping[8] existing userspace programs. The next best approach is forcing a single empty string into argv and adjusting argc to match. The number of programs depending on argc == 0 seems a smaller set than those calling execve with a NULL argv. Account for the additional stack space in bprm_stack_limits(). Inject an empty string when argc == 0 (and set argc = 1). Warn about the case so userspace has some notice about the change: process './argc0' launched './argc0' with NULL argv: empty string added Additionally WARN() and reject NULL argv usage for kernel threads. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220127000724.15106-1-ariadne@dereferenced.org/ [2] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/exec.html [3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8408 [4] https://www.qualys.com/2022/01/25/cve-2021-4034/pwnkit.txt [5] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/176 [6] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=execve%5C+*%5C%28%5B%5E%2C%5D%2B%2C+*NULL&literal=0 [7] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=execlp%3F%5Cs*%5C%28%5B%5E%2C%5D%2B%2C%5Cs*NULL&literal=0 [8] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220131144352.GE16385@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exec: Force single empty string when argv is empty Quoting[1] Ariadne Conill: "In several other operating systems, it is a hard requirement that the second argument to execve(2) be the name of a program, thus prohibiting a scenario where argc < 1. POSIX 2017 also recommends this behaviour, but it is not an explicit requirement[2]: The argument arg0 should point to a filename string that is associated with the process being started by one of the exec functions. ... Interestingly, Michael Kerrisk opened an issue about this in 2008[3], but there was no consensus to support fixing this issue then. Hopefully now that CVE-2021-4034 shows practical exploitative use[4] of this bug in a shellcode, we can reconsider. This issue is being tracked in the KSPP issue tracker[5]." While the initial code searches[6][7] turned up what appeared to be mostly corner case tests, trying to that just reject argv == NULL (or an immediately terminated pointer list) quickly started tripping[8] existing userspace programs. The next best approach is forcing a single empty string into argv and adjusting argc to match. The number of programs depending on argc == 0 seems a smaller set than those calling execve with a NULL argv. Account for the additional stack space in bprm_stack_limits(). Inject an empty string when argc == 0 (and set argc = 1). Warn about the case so userspace has some notice about the change: process './argc0' launched './argc0' with NULL argv: empty string added Additionally WARN() and reject NULL argv usage for kernel threads. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220127000724.15106-1-ariadne@dereferenced.org/ [2] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/exec.html [3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8408 [4] https://www.qualys.com/2022/01/25/cve-2021-4034/pwnkit.txt [5] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/176 [6] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=execve%5C+*%5C%28%5B%5E%2C%5D%2B%2C+*NULL&literal=0 [7] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=execlp%3F%5Cs*%5C%28%5B%5E%2C%5D%2B%2C%5Cs*NULL&literal=0 [8] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220131144352.GE16385@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exec: Force single empty string when argv is empty Quoting[1] Ariadne Conill: "In several other operating systems, it is a hard requirement that the second argument to execve(2) be the name of a program, thus prohibiting a scenario where argc < 1. POSIX 2017 also recommends this behaviour, but it is not an explicit requirement[2]: The argument arg0 should point to a filename string that is associated with the process being started by one of the exec functions. ... Interestingly, Michael Kerrisk opened an issue about this in 2008[3], but there was no consensus to support fixing this issue then. Hopefully now that CVE-2021-4034 shows practical exploitative use[4] of this bug in a shellcode, we can reconsider. This issue is being tracked in the KSPP issue tracker[5]." While the initial code searches[6][7] turned up what appeared to be mostly corner case tests, trying to that just reject argv == NULL (or an immediately terminated pointer list) quickly started tripping[8] existing userspace programs. The next best approach is forcing a single empty string into argv and adjusting argc to match. The number of programs depending on argc == 0 seems a smaller set than those calling execve with a NULL argv. Account for the additional stack space in bprm_stack_limits(). Inject an empty string when argc == 0 (and set argc = 1). Warn about the case so userspace has some notice about the change: process './argc0' launched './argc0' with NULL argv: empty string added Additionally WARN() and reject NULL argv usage for kernel threads. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220127000724.15106-1-ariadne@dereferenced.org/ [2] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/exec.html [3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8408 [4] https://www.qualys.com/2022/01/25/cve-2021-4034/pwnkit.txt [5] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/176 [6] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=execve%5C+*%5C%28%5B%5E%2C%5D%2B%2C+*NULL&literal=0 [7] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=execlp%3F%5Cs*%5C%28%5B%5E%2C%5D%2B%2C%5Cs*NULL&literal=0 [8] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220131144352.GE16385@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-49227 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49228 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49228 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49229 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49229 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49231 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49231 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49237 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49237 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49257 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49259 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49262 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49263 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49264 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49266 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49268 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49269 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49272 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49273 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49279 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49279 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49286 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49286 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49290 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49254 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49256 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49257 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49258 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49259 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49260 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49261 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49262 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49263 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49264 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49265 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49266 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49268 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49269 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49270 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49271 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49272 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49254 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49256 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49257 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49258 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49259 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49260 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49261 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49262 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49263 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49264 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49265 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49266 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49268 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49269 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49270 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49271 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49272 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49254 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49256 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49256 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49257 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49257 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49258 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49258 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49259 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49259 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49260 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49260 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49261 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49261 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49262 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49262 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49263 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49263 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49264 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49264 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49265 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49265 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49266 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49266 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49268 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49268 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49269 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49269 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49270 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49270 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49271 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49271 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49272 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49272 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49273 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 41f6ea5b9aaa28b740d47ffe995a5013211fdbb0; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 98e0c7c702894987732776736c99b85ade6fba45; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < b50fb8dbc8b81aaa126387de428f4c42a7c72a73; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 1fe82bfd9e4ce93399d815ca458b58505191c3e8; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 27a6f495b63a1804cc71be45911065db7757a98c; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < 1290eb4412aa0f0e9f3434b406dc8e255da85f9e; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < a8054d3fa5deb84b215d6be1b910a978f3cb840d; 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2 < cfbfff8ce5e3d674947581f1eb9af0a1b1807950
Fixed
< 2.6.12; 4.9.317 ≤ 4.9.*; 4.14.282 ≤ 4.14.*; 4.19.246 ≤ 4.19.*; 5.4.197 ≤ 5.4.*; 5.10.110 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.33 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.16.19 ≤ 5.16.*
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-54962
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49264 · cve.blacktree.nl