BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49174High confidence

ext4: fix ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-55051

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit In case of flex_bg feature (which is by default enabled), extents for any given inode might span across blocks from two different block group. ext4_mb_mark_bb() only reads the buffer_head of block bitmap once for the starting block group, but it fails to read it again when the extent length boundary overflows to another block group. Then in this below loop it accesses memory beyond the block group bitmap buffer_head and results into a data abort. for (i = 0; i < clen; i++) if (!mb_test_bit(blkoff + i, bitmap_bh->b_data) == !state) already++; This patch adds this functionality for checking block group boundary in ext4_mb_mark_bb() and update the buffer_head(bitmap_bh) for every different block group. w/o this patch, I was easily able to hit a data access abort using Power platform. <...> [ 74.327662] EXT4-fs error (device loop3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:1141: group 11, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 21248 vs 23294 free clusters [ 74.533214] EXT4-fs (loop3): shut down requested (2) [ 74.536705] Aborting journal on device loop3-8. [ 74.702705] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc00000005e980000 [ 74.703727] Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000007bffb8 cpu 0xd: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c000000015db7060] pc: c0000000007bffb8: ext4_mb_mark_bb+0x198/0x5a0 lr: c0000000007bfeec: ext4_mb_mark_bb+0xcc/0x5a0 sp: c000000015db7300 msr: 800000000280b033 dar: c00000005e980000 dsisr: 40000000 current = 0xc000000027af6880 paca = 0xc00000003ffd5200 irqmask: 0x03 irq_happened: 0x01 pid = 5167, comm = mount <...> enter ? for help [c000000015db7380] c000000000782708 ext4_ext_clear_bb+0x378/0x410 [c000000015db7400] c000000000813f14 ext4_fc_replay+0x1794/0x2000 [c000000015db7580] c000000000833f7c do_one_pass+0xe9c/0x12a0 [c000000015db7710] c000000000834504 jbd2_journal_recover+0x184/0x2d0 [c000000015db77c0] c000000000841398 jbd2_journal_load+0x188/0x4a0 [c000000015db7880] c000000000804de8 ext4_fill_super+0x2638/0x3e10 [c000000015db7a40] c0000000005f8404 get_tree_bdev+0x2b4/0x350 [c000000015db7ae0] c0000000007ef058 ext4_get_tree+0x28/0x40 [c000000015db7b00] c0000000005f6344 vfs_get_tree+0x44/0x100 [c000000015db7b70] c00000000063c408 path_mount+0xdd8/0xe70 [c000000015db7c40] c00000000063c8f0 sys_mount+0x450/0x550 [c000000015db7d50] c000000000035770 system_call_exception+0x4a0/0x4e0 [c000000015db7e10] c00000000000c74c system_call_common+0xec/0x250

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit In case of flex_bg feature (which is by default enabled), extents for any given inode might span across blocks from two different block group. ext4_mb_mark_bb() only reads the buffer_head of block bitmap once for the starting block group, but it fails to read it again when the extent length boundary overflows to another block group. Then in this below loop it accesses memory beyond the block group bitmap buffer_head and results into a data abort. for (i = 0; i < clen; i++) if (!mb_test_bit(blkoff + i, bitmap_bh->b_data) == !state) already++; This patch adds this functionality for checking block group boundary in ext4_mb_mark_bb() and update the buffer_head(bitmap_bh) for every different block group. w/o this patch, I was easily able to hit a data access abort using Power platform. <...> [ 74.327662] EXT4-fs error (device loop3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:1141: group 11, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 21248 vs 23294 free clusters [ 74.533214] EXT4-fs (loop3): shut down requested (2) [ 74.536705] Aborting journal on device loop3-8. [ 74.702705] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc00000005e980000 [ 74.703727] Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000007bffb8 cpu 0xd: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c000000015db7060] pc: c0000000007bffb8: ext4_mb_mark_bb+0x198/0x5a0 lr: c0000000007bfeec: ext4_mb_mark_bb+0xcc/0x5a0 sp: c000000015db7300 msr: 800000000280b033 dar: c00000005e980000 dsisr: 40000000 current = 0xc000000027af6880 paca = 0xc00000003ffd5200 irqmask: 0x03 irq_happened: 0x01 pid = 5167, comm = mount <...> enter ? for help [c000000015db7380] c000000000782708 ext4_ext_clear_bb+0x378/0x410 [c000000015db7400] c000000000813f14 ext4_fc_replay+0x1794/0x2000 [c000000015db7580] c000000000833f7c do_one_pass+0xe9c/0x12a0 [c000000015db7710] c000000000834504 jbd2_journal_recover+0x184/0x2d0 [c000000015db77c0] c000000000841398 jbd2_journal_load+0x188/0x4a0 [c000000015db7880] c000000000804de8 ext4_fill_super+0x2638/0x3e10 [c000000015db7a40] c0000000005f8404 get_tree_bdev+0x2b4/0x350 [c000000015db7ae0] c0000000007ef058 ext4_get_tree+0x28/0x40 [c000000015db7b00] c0000000005f6344 vfs_get_tree+0x44/0x100 [c000000015db7b70] c00000000063c408 path_mount+0xdd8/0xe70 [c000000015db7c40] c00000000063c8f0 sys_mount+0x450/0x550 [c000000015db7d50] c000000000035770 system_call_exception+0x4a0/0x4e0 [c000000015db7e10] c00000000000c74c system_call_common+0xec/0x250

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix ext4_mb_mark_bb() with flex_bg with fast_commit In case of flex_bg feature (which is by default enabled), extents for any given inode might span across blocks from two different block group. ext4_mb_mark_bb() only reads the buffer_head of block bitmap once for the starting block group, but it fails to read it again when the extent length boundary overflows to another block group. Then in this below loop it accesses memory beyond the block group bitmap buffer_head and results into a data abort. for (i = 0; i < clen; i++) if (!mb_test_bit(blkoff + i, bitmap_bh->b_data) == !state) already++; This patch adds this functionality for checking block group boundary in ext4_mb_mark_bb() and update the buffer_head(bitmap_bh) for every different block group. w/o this patch, I was easily able to hit a data access abort using Power platform. <...> [ 74.327662] EXT4-fs error (device loop3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:1141: group 11, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 21248 vs 23294 free clusters [ 74.533214] EXT4-fs (loop3): shut down requested (2) [ 74.536705] Aborting journal on device loop3-8. [ 74.702705] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc00000005e980000 [ 74.703727] Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000007bffb8 cpu 0xd: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c000000015db7060] pc: c0000000007bffb8: ext4_mb_mark_bb+0x198/0x5a0 lr: c0000000007bfeec: ext4_mb_mark_bb+0xcc/0x5a0 sp: c000000015db7300 msr: 800000000280b033 dar: c00000005e980000 dsisr: 40000000 current = 0xc000000027af6880 paca = 0xc00000003ffd5200 irqmask: 0x03 irq_happened: 0x01 pid = 5167, comm = mount <...> enter ? for help [c000000015db7380] c000000000782708 ext4_ext_clear_bb+0x378/0x410 [c000000015db7400] c000000000813f14 ext4_fc_replay+0x1794/0x2000 [c000000015db7580] c000000000833f7c do_one_pass+0xe9c/0x12a0 [c000000015db7710] c000000000834504 jbd2_journal_recover+0x184/0x2d0 [c000000015db77c0] c000000000841398 jbd2_journal_load+0x188/0x4a0 [c000000015db7880] c000000000804de8 ext4_fill_super+0x2638/0x3e10 [c000000015db7a40] c0000000005f8404 get_tree_bdev+0x2b4/0x350 [c000000015db7ae0] c0000000007ef058 ext4_get_tree+0x28/0x40 [c000000015db7b00] c0000000005f6344 vfs_get_tree+0x44/0x100 [c000000015db7b70] c00000000063c408 path_mount+0xdd8/0xe70 [c000000015db7c40] c00000000063c8f0 sys_mount+0x450/0x550 [c000000015db7d50] c000000000035770 system_call_exception+0x4a0/0x4e0 [c000000015db7e10] c00000000000c74c system_call_common+0xec/0x250

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-49147 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49148 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49148 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49152 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49152 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49153 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49153 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49154 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49154 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49155 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49155 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49156 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49156 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49159 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49171 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49174 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49175 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49180 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49187 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49188 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49188 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49197 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49197 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49198 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49198 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49204 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49204 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49205 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0336Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49156 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49157 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49158 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49159 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49160 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49162 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49163 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49164 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49165 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49174 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49175 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49176 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49177 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49178 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49179 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49180 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49182 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0307Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49156 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49157 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49158 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49159 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49160 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49162 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49163 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49164 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49165 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49174 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49175 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49176 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49177 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49178 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49178 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49179 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49180 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49182 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49183 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0252Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-49156 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49157 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49157 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49158 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49158 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49159 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49159 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49160 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49160 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49162 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49162 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49163 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49163 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49164 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49164 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49165 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49165 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49174 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49174 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49175 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49176 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49177 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49177 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49179 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49179 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49180 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49180 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49182 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49182 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49185 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49185 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49187 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
8016e29f4362e285f0f7e38fadc61a5b7bdfdfa2 < cd6d719534af993210306f8a13f9cb3e615f7c8d; 8016e29f4362e285f0f7e38fadc61a5b7bdfdfa2 < 6a6beb074186a0452368a023a261c7d0eaebe838; 8016e29f4362e285f0f7e38fadc61a5b7bdfdfa2 < b07eedd0222e9548ffc568ec429bb1f61d21a39c; 8016e29f4362e285f0f7e38fadc61a5b7bdfdfa2 < 803fb0e8240cc16585a5c9df76add1dfaa781773; 8016e29f4362e285f0f7e38fadc61a5b7bdfdfa2 < bfdc502a4a4c058bf4cbb1df0c297761d528f54d; 5.10
Fixed
< 5.10; 5.10.110 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.33 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.16.19 ≤ 5.16.*; 5.17.2 ≤ 5.17.*; 5.18 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-55051
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49174 · cve.blacktree.nl