BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2025
CVE-2022-49110High confidence

netfilter: conntrack: revisit gc autotuning

Linux · Linux

7.5HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-55102

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: conntrack: revisit gc autotuning as of commit 4608fdfc07e1 ("netfilter: conntrack: collect all entries in one cycle") conntrack gc was changed to run every 2 minutes. On systems where conntrack hash table is set to large value, most evictions happen from gc worker rather than the packet path due to hash table distribution. This causes netlink event overflows when events are collected. This change collects average expiry of scanned entries and reschedules to the average remaining value, within 1 to 60 second interval. To avoid event overflows, reschedule after each bucket and add a limit for both run time and number of evictions per run. If more entries have to be evicted, reschedule and restart 1 jiffy into the future.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: conntrack: revisit gc autotuning as of commit 4608fdfc07e1 ("netfilter: conntrack: collect all entries in one cycle") conntrack gc was changed to run every 2 minutes. On systems where conntrack hash table is set to large value, most evictions happen from gc worker rather than the packet path due to hash table distribution. This causes netlink event overflows when events are collected. This change collects average expiry of scanned entries and reschedules to the average remaining value, within 1 to 60 second interval. To avoid event overflows, reschedule after each bucket and add a limit for both run time and number of evictions per run. If more entries have to be evicted, reschedule and restart 1 jiffy into the future.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: conntrack: revisit gc autotuning as of commit 4608fdfc07e1 ("netfilter: conntrack: collect all entries in one cycle") conntrack gc was changed to run every 2 minutes. On systems where conntrack hash table is set to large value, most evictions happen from gc worker rather than the packet path due to hash table distribution. This causes netlink event overflows when events are collected. This change collects average expiry of scanned entries and reschedules to the average remaining value, within 1 to 60 second interval. To avoid event overflows, reschedule after each bucket and add a limit for both run time and number of evictions per run. If more entries have to be evicted, reschedule and restart 1 jiffy into the future.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through a network path may attempt exploitation without authentication or user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
a network path → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Network
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVNetworkAttack vector: The vulnerable component can be reached over a network.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
No specific living-off-the-land technique is confirmed in the structured sources. Monitor normal administration tools for activity inconsistent with the affected service's baseline.
NetworkUnauthenticated
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2026-AVI-0081Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2585 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2586 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2905 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4662 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49767 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0587Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2585 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2586 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2586 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2905 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3903 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3903 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4095 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4095 Référence CVE CVE-2022-4662 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4662 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49767 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49772 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49775 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49775 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49776 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0529Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ERecord?id=CVE-2021-47500 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47511 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47511 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47670 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48704 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48875 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48875 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49145 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49145 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49168 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49168 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49190 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49190 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49212 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49212 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49216 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49216 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49235 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49235 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49248 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0509Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

se.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501930-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01935-1 du 12 juin 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501935-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:01932-1 du 13 juin 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202501932-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3619 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3619 Référence CVE CVE-2022-3640 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3640 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49563 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49563 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49564 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49564 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49767 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49767 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49769 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49769 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49770 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49770 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49771 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49771 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49772 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0449Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-47668 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47669 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47669 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47670 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47670 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47671 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47671 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48933 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49044 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49044 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49055 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49055 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49060 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49060 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49086 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49086 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49110 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49110 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49111 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49111 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49118 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49118 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49121 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49121 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49137 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49137 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49139 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49171 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49171 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49175 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49175 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49176 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
4608fdfc07e116f9fc0895beb40abad7cdb5ee3d < 58d52743ae85d28c9335c6034d6ce350b8689951; 4608fdfc07e116f9fc0895beb40abad7cdb5ee3d < 7cd361d5e6d986c0d4cafb9ceaa803359048ae15; 4608fdfc07e116f9fc0895beb40abad7cdb5ee3d < 592e57591826f3d09c28d755a39ea8e9d13705ad; 4608fdfc07e116f9fc0895beb40abad7cdb5ee3d < 2cfadb761d3d0219412fd8150faea60c7e863833; dafc95a1e473a0b857af34ecbb17b8b1c90edd75; 5892f910f401c1facfc410e0b042108f2827a77b; f68ad168e23565ce2a3891fec537cfaf8410d1e6; 7aa03980b21fdc7355e20274a68a69a0b2a45c08
Fixed
< 5.14; 5.15.34 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.16.20 ≤ 5.16.*; 5.17.3 ≤ 5.17.*; 5.18 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. If business-safe, reduce exposure to the affected interface and allow only trusted sources until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 26 Feb 2025 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-55102
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-49110 · cve.blacktree.nl