BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2022-48953High confidence

rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 199 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityMediumOperational priority:Low, lowered one band.downgradedsince 11 May 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.24% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: No default targetRemediation target: Normal maintenance

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 199 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.6.1.4-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Direct vendor intelligence

Authoritative vendor CSAF and VEX advisories

Structured product status and remediation from the issuing vendor. Product-state explanations are always visible; large lists can be searched or downloaded.

1 current
CVE-2022-48953 · CSAF 2.0 · revision 3 · finalRed Hat Product Securitykernel: rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue
198 known affected

The vendor explicitly identifies these products as affected by this CVE.

  • kernel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-abi-whitelists as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-bootwrapper as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-debug-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-doc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-firmware as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-headers as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel-kdump-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • kernel.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Summary
A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's rtc-cmos driver. An ordering issue during event handler registration can lead to a null pointer dereference if the Real-Time Clock (RTC) fixed event is active during system initialization. This vulnerability could allow a local attacker to cause a system crash, resulting in a denial of service.
Remediation
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-53832

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 199 structured product or package states remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue Because acpi_install_fixed_event_handler() enables the event automatically on success, it is incorrect to call it before the handler routine passed to it is ready to handle events. Unfortunately, the rtc-cmos driver does exactly the incorrect thing by calling cmos_wake_setup(), which passes rtc_handler() to acpi_install_fixed_event_handler(), before cmos_do_probe(), because rtc_handler() uses dev_get_drvdata() to get to the cmos object pointer and the driver data pointer is only populated in cmos_do_probe(). This leads to a NULL pointer dereference in rtc_handler() on boot if the RTC fixed event happens to be active at the init time. To address this issue, change the initialization ordering of the driver so that cmos_wake_setup() is always called after a successful cmos_do_probe() call. While at it, change cmos_pnp_probe() to call cmos_do_probe() after the initial if () statement used for computing the IRQ argument to be passed to cmos_do_probe() which is cleaner than calling it in each branch of that if () (local variable "irq" can be of type int, because it is passed to that function as an argument of type int). Note that commit 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0") caused this issue to affect a larger number of systems, because previously it only affected systems with ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 set, but it is present regardless of that commit.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue Because acpi_install_fixed_event_handler() enables the event automatically on success, it is incorrect to call it before the handler routine passed to it is ready to handle events. Unfortunately, the rtc-cmos driver does exactly the incorrect thing by calling cmos_wake_setup(), which passes rtc_handler() to acpi_install_fixed_event_handler(), before cmos_do_probe(), because rtc_handler() uses dev_get_drvdata() to get to the cmos object pointer and the driver data pointer is only populated in cmos_do_probe(). This leads to a NULL pointer dereference in rtc_handler() on boot if the RTC fixed event happens to be active at the init time. To address this issue, change the initialization ordering of the driver so that cmos_wake_setup() is always called after a successful cmos_do_probe() call. While at it, change cmos_pnp_probe() to call cmos_do_probe() after the initial if () statement used for computing the IRQ argument to be passed to cmos_do_probe() which is cleaner than calling it in each branch of that if () (local variable "irq" can be of type int, because it is passed to that function as an argument of type int). Note that commit 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0") caused this issue to affect a larger number of systems, because previously it only affected systems with ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 set, but it is present regardless of that commit.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue Because acpi_install_fixed_event_handler() enables the event automatically on success, it is incorrect to call it before the handler routine passed to it is ready to handle events. Unfortunately, the rtc-cmos driver does exactly the incorrect thing by calling cmos_wake_setup(), which passes rtc_handler() to acpi_install_fixed_event_handler(), before cmos_do_probe(), because rtc_handler() uses dev_get_drvdata() to get to the cmos object pointer and the driver data pointer is only populated in cmos_do_probe(). This leads to a NULL pointer dereference in rtc_handler() on boot if the RTC fixed event happens to be active at the init time. To address this issue, change the initialization ordering of the driver so that cmos_wake_setup() is always called after a successful cmos_do_probe() call. While at it, change cmos_pnp_probe() to call cmos_do_probe() after the initial if () statement used for computing the IRQ argument to be passed to cmos_do_probe() which is cleaner than calling it in each branch of that if () (local variable "irq" can be of type int, because it is passed to that function as an argument of type int). Note that commit 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0") caused this issue to affect a larger number of systems, because previously it only affected systems with ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 set, but it is present regardless of that commit.

Why

The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → NULL Pointer Dereference → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-476 ↗

CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference. The product dereferences a pointer that it expects to be valid but is NULL.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-476
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-3251Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere, nicht näher bekannte Auswirkungen zu erzielen..

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20241023Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 23 Oct 2024, published on 23 October 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-48929 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48931 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48934 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48938 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48939 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48939 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48942 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48942 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48944 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48946 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48951 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48953 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48963 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48963 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48969 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48969 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48971 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48971 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48972 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48972 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48974 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48974 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48976 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48976 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48978 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48978 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48981 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0212Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

ord?id=CVE-2021-47633 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47634 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47634 Référence CVE CVE-2021-47644 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47644 Référence CVE CVE-2022-2991 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2991 Référence CVE CVE-2022-36280 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36280 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48636 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48636 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48650 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48650 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48664 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48742 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48742 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48953 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48975 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48975 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49006 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49006 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49033 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49033 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49035 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49035 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49076 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49076 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49080 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49089 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49089 Référence CVE CVE-2022-49124 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1102Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48664 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48674 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48674 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48853 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48879 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48946 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48947 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48948 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48949 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48951 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48953 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48954 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48955 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48956 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48957 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48958 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48959 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48960 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1048Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48879 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48946 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48947 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48948 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48949 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48951 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48953 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48954 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48955 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48956 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48958 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48959 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48960 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48961 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-1033Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2022-3435 Référence CVE CVE-2022-45934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45934 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48664 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48879 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48946 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48947 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48948 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48949 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48951 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48953 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48954 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48955 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48956 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48959 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48960 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48961 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48962 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48962 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48967 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0999Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

rd?id=CVE-2022-3435 Référence CVE CVE-2022-45934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45934 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48664 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48664 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48879 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48879 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48946 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48946 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48947 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48947 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48948 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48948 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48949 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48949 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48951 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48951 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48953 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48953 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48954 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48954 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48955 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48955 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48956 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48956 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48957 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48957 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48958 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48958 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48959 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48959 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48960 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48960 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48961 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-025508Linux の Linux Kernel における NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、NULL ポインタデリファレンスに関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Fixed
Linux: < 2.6.28, 5.10.163 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.86 ≤ 5.15.*, 6.0.14 ≤ 6.0.*, 6.1 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 21 Oct 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 18:50 UTC · CWE-476 · NULL Pointer Dereference

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-53832
Product sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
Remediation sourceVendor CSAF · Red Hat Product Security
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD enriched

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-48953 · cve.blacktree.nl