BlackTreeCVE Intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2022-48925High confidence

RDMA/cma: Do not change route.addr.src_addr outside state checks

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Patch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
R
Operational reassessment

Published severity in operational context

Open reassessment dashboard →
Published severityHighOperational priority:Medium, lowered one band.downgradedsince 5 Aug 2026

Evidence used

  • No CISA KEV confirmation is currently recorded.
  • Exploitation requires an existing local or physical foothold with privileges.
  • EPSS is 0.22% for the current model date.

Compensating controls

  • Validate the affected product branch and deploy the verified fixed release.
  • Restrict local access and enforce least privilege on affected hosts.
  • Monitor vendor guidance and exploitation sources for a material change.

Verification

  1. Confirm that the asset runs Linux Linux and falls inside the recorded affected range.
  2. Verify the installed build against the product-specific fixed version after deployment.
  3. Validate exposure, authentication requirements and compensating controls in the actual environment.
  4. Reopen this reassessment when CVSS, KEV, EPSS, exploit evidence or remediation changes.
Mitigation target: As exposure requiresRemediation target: Within 365 days

This automated reassessment organises public evidence. It does not know asset exposure, business impact or control effectiveness and does not replace CVSS or a human risk decision.

Cross-source reconciliation

Remediation availability differs by product scope

Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Distribution package intelligence

Release-specific package status

Debian, ubuntu findings are scoped to the named distribution, release and source package. An absent finding does not mean a package is unaffected.

5 package states
Package result overrides the generic status

BlackTree has verified remediation for at least one product or source, but the relevant distribution still reports no fixed package for 1 affected package state shown here. Treat those rows as affected with no fix until that distribution publishes a fixed version.

Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Distribution releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Debian trixietrixie · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.16.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian bookwormbookworm · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.16.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian forkyforky · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.16.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Debian sidsid · sourcelinuxVendor fix publishedDebian records a fixed source-package version for this release.5.16.12-1Debian Security Tracker ↗Source updated 6 Oct 2026
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical Ubuntu Security ↗Source updated 5 Oct 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Choose official national sources for this report. Each advisory shows its original language. Your selection is remembered on this device and included in shared links.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-53804

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionPatch only the product branches with a verified fix

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance. Verified remediation exists for at least one product or source, but 1 structured product or package state remain unresolved. Apply remediation only to the exact product branch confirmed by its source.

Fix availability varies by product
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/cma: Do not change route.addr.src_addr outside state checks If the state is not idle then resolve_prepare_src() should immediately fail and no change to global state should happen. However, it unconditionally overwrites the src_addr trying to build a temporary any address. For instance if the state is already RDMA_CM_LISTEN then this will corrupt the src_addr and would cause the test in cma_cancel_operation(): if (cma_any_addr(cma_src_addr(id_priv)) && !id_priv->cma_dev) Which would manifest as this trace from syzkaller: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __list_add_valid+0x93/0xa0 lib/list_debug.c:26 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881546491e0 by task syz-executor.1/32204 CPU: 1 PID: 32204 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc8-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline] dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description.constprop.0.cold+0x5b/0x2f8 mm/kasan/report.c:232 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:399 [inline] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 mm/kasan/report.c:416 __list_add_valid+0x93/0xa0 lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add include/linux/list.h:67 [inline] list_add_tail include/linux/list.h:100 [inline] cma_listen_on_all drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:2557 [inline] rdma_listen+0x787/0xe00 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:3751 ucma_listen+0x16a/0x210 drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c:1102 ucma_write+0x259/0x350 drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c:1732 vfs_write+0x28e/0xa30 fs/read_write.c:603 ksys_write+0x1ee/0x250 fs/read_write.c:658 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae This is indicating that an rdma_id_private was destroyed without doing cma_cancel_listens(). Instead of trying to re-use the src_addr memory to indirectly create an any address derived from the dst build one explicitly on the stack and bind to that as any other normal flow would do. rdma_bind_addr() will copy it over the src_addr once it knows the state is valid. This is similar to commit bc0bdc5afaa7 ("RDMA/cma: Do not change route.addr.src_addr.ss_family")

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/cma: Do not change route.addr.src_addr outside state checks If the state is not idle then resolve_prepare_src() should immediately fail and no change to global state should happen. However, it unconditionally overwrites the src_addr trying to build a temporary any address. For instance if the state is already RDMA_CM_LISTEN then this will corrupt the src_addr and would cause the test in cma_cancel_operation(): if (cma_any_addr(cma_src_addr(id_priv)) && !id_priv->cma_dev) Which would manifest as this trace from syzkaller: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __list_add_valid+0x93/0xa0 lib/list_debug.c:26 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881546491e0 by task syz-executor.1/32204 CPU: 1 PID: 32204 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc8-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline] dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description.constprop.0.cold+0x5b/0x2f8 mm/kasan/report.c:232 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:399 [inline] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 mm/kasan/report.c:416 __list_add_valid+0x93/0xa0 lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add include/linux/list.h:67 [inline] list_add_tail include/linux/list.h:100 [inline] cma_listen_on_all drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:2557 [inline] rdma_listen+0x787/0xe00 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:3751 ucma_listen+0x16a/0x210 drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c:1102 ucma_write+0x259/0x350 drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c:1732 vfs_write+0x28e/0xa30 fs/read_write.c:603 ksys_write+0x1ee/0x250 fs/read_write.c:658 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae This is indicating that an rdma_id_private was destroyed without doing cma_cancel_listens(). Instead of trying to re-use the src_addr memory to indirectly create an any address derived from the dst build one explicitly on the stack and bind to that as any other normal flow would do. rdma_bind_addr() will copy it over the src_addr once it knows the state is valid. This is similar to commit bc0bdc5afaa7 ("RDMA/cma: Do not change route.addr.src_addr.ss_family")

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/cma: Do not change route.addr.src_addr outside state checks If the state is not idle then resolve_prepare_src() should immediately fail and no change to global state should happen. However, it unconditionally overwrites the src_addr trying to build a temporary any address. For instance if the state is already RDMA_CM_LISTEN then this will corrupt the src_addr and would cause the test in cma_cancel_operation(): if (cma_any_addr(cma_src_addr(id_priv)) && !id_priv->cma_dev) Which would manifest as this trace from syzkaller: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __list_add_valid+0x93/0xa0 lib/list_debug.c:26 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881546491e0 by task syz-executor.1/32204 CPU: 1 PID: 32204 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc8-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline] dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description.constprop.0.cold+0x5b/0x2f8 mm/kasan/report.c:232 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:399 [inline] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 mm/kasan/report.c:416 __list_add_valid+0x93/0xa0 lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add include/linux/list.h:67 [inline] list_add_tail include/linux/list.h:100 [inline] cma_listen_on_all drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:2557 [inline] rdma_listen+0x787/0xe00 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:3751 ucma_listen+0x16a/0x210 drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c:1102 ucma_write+0x259/0x350 drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c:1732 vfs_write+0x28e/0xa30 fs/read_write.c:603 ksys_write+0x1ee/0x250 fs/read_write.c:658 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae This is indicating that an rdma_id_private was destroyed without doing cma_cancel_listens(). Instead of trying to re-use the src_addr memory to indirectly create an any address derived from the dst build one explicitly on the stack and bind to that as any other normal flow would do. rdma_bind_addr() will copy it over the src_addr once it knows the state is valid. This is similar to commit bc0bdc5afaa7 ("RDMA/cma: Do not change route.addr.src_addr.ss_family")

Why

The program can continue using memory after it has been released, producing unsafe and attacker-influenceable behaviour.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Use After Free → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-416 ↗

CWE-416: Use After Free. The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory belongs to the code that operates on the new pointer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
CWE-416
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-2024-1898Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory ↗
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore · English · CSA-SB-20240828Security Bulletin 28 Aug 2024

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore included this CVE in its official Security Bulletin 28 Aug 2024, published on 28 August 2024. Open the linked bulletin for the product, severity and reference information published in that issue.

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0840Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48917 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48919 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48920 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48921 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48926 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48930 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48931 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48932 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0822Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48913 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48914 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48917 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48919 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48921 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48926 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48930 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48931 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48932 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0800Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48896 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48899 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48899 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48901 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48905 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48905 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48910 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48910 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48912 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48917 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48919 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48920 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48926 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48930 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48931 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48933 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48934 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48934 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48938 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48938 Référence CVE CVE-2023-1582 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=C

Official advisory ↗
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48917 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48919 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48920 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48921 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48926 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48930 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48931 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48932 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48932 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48933 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory ↗
JVN iPedia · Japanese · JVNDB-2022-025365Linux の Linux Kernel における解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性

Linux の Linux Kernel には、解放済みメモリの使用に関する脆弱性が存在します。

Official advisory ↗
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Fix availability varies by product
Affected
Linux: 732d41c545bb359cbb8c94698bdc1f8bcf82279c < 5b1cef5798b4fd6e4fd5522e7b8a26248beeacaa, 732d41c545bb359cbb8c94698bdc1f8bcf82279c < 00265efbd3e5705038c9492a434fda8cf960c8a2, 732d41c545bb359cbb8c94698bdc1f8bcf82279c < d350724795c7a48b05bf921d94699fbfecf7da0b, 732d41c545bb359cbb8c94698bdc1f8bcf82279c < 22e9f71072fa605cbf033158db58e0790101928d, 5.10
Fixed
Linux: < 5.10, 5.10.103 ≤ 5.10.*, 5.15.26 ≤ 5.15.*, 5.16.12 ≤ 5.16.*, 5.17 ≤ *
Action
Use the product-specific evidence above. Patch only products with a verified fixed release, and keep every affected or under-investigation state without a matching fix in the remediation queue.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Aug 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC · CWE-416 · Use After Free

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-53804
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates ↗

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-48925 · cve.blacktree.nl