BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2022-48923High confidence

btrfs: prevent copying too big compressed lzo segment

Linux · Linux

7.8HighCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Within 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 9 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-53802

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionWithin 7 days

High technical severity; prioritise exposed affected systems while verifying vendor guidance.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: prevent copying too big compressed lzo segment Compressed length can be corrupted to be a lot larger than memory we have allocated for buffer. This will cause memcpy in copy_compressed_segment to write outside of allocated memory. This mostly results in stuck read syscall but sometimes when using btrfs send can get #GP kernel: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x841551d5c1000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI kernel: CPU: 17 PID: 264 Comm: kworker/u256:7 Tainted: P OE 5.17.0-rc2-1 #12 kernel: Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] kernel: RIP: 0010:lzo_decompress_bio (./include/linux/fortify-string.h:225 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:322 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:394) btrfs Code starting with the faulting instruction =========================================== 0:* 48 8b 06 mov (%rsi),%rax <-- trapping instruction 3: 48 8d 79 08 lea 0x8(%rcx),%rdi 7: 48 83 e7 f8 and $0xfffffffffffffff8,%rdi b: 48 89 01 mov %rax,(%rcx) e: 44 89 f0 mov %r14d,%eax 11: 48 8b 54 06 f8 mov -0x8(%rsi,%rax,1),%rdx kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb110812efd50 EFLAGS: 00010212 kernel: RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: 000000009ca264c8 RCX: ffff98996e6d8ff8 kernel: RDX: 0000000000000064 RSI: 000841551d5c1000 RDI: ffffffff9500435d kernel: RBP: ffff989a3be856c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff98996e6d8000 kernel: R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 000841551d5c1000 kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98a09d640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 kernel: CR2: 00001e9f984d9ea8 CR3: 000000014971a000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 kernel: Call Trace: kernel: <TASK> kernel: end_compressed_bio_read (fs/btrfs/compression.c:104 fs/btrfs/compression.c:1363 fs/btrfs/compression.c:323) btrfs kernel: end_workqueue_fn (fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1923) btrfs kernel: btrfs_work_helper (fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:326) btrfs kernel: process_one_work (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 ./include/linux/jump_label.h:212 ./include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2312) kernel: worker_thread (./include/linux/list.h:292 kernel/workqueue.c:2455) kernel: ? process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2397) kernel: kthread (kernel/kthread.c:377) kernel: ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:332) kernel: ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:301) kernel: </TASK>

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: prevent copying too big compressed lzo segment Compressed length can be corrupted to be a lot larger than memory we have allocated for buffer. This will cause memcpy in copy_compressed_segment to write outside of allocated memory. This mostly results in stuck read syscall but sometimes when using btrfs send can get #GP kernel: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x841551d5c1000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI kernel: CPU: 17 PID: 264 Comm: kworker/u256:7 Tainted: P OE 5.17.0-rc2-1 #12 kernel: Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] kernel: RIP: 0010:lzo_decompress_bio (./include/linux/fortify-string.h:225 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:322 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:394) btrfs Code starting with the faulting instruction =========================================== 0:* 48 8b 06 mov (%rsi),%rax <-- trapping instruction 3: 48 8d 79 08 lea 0x8(%rcx),%rdi 7: 48 83 e7 f8 and $0xfffffffffffffff8,%rdi b: 48 89 01 mov %rax,(%rcx) e: 44 89 f0 mov %r14d,%eax 11: 48 8b 54 06 f8 mov -0x8(%rsi,%rax,1),%rdx kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb110812efd50 EFLAGS: 00010212 kernel: RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: 000000009ca264c8 RCX: ffff98996e6d8ff8 kernel: RDX: 0000000000000064 RSI: 000841551d5c1000 RDI: ffffffff9500435d kernel: RBP: ffff989a3be856c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff98996e6d8000 kernel: R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 000841551d5c1000 kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98a09d640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 kernel: CR2: 00001e9f984d9ea8 CR3: 000000014971a000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 kernel: Call Trace: kernel: <TASK> kernel: end_compressed_bio_read (fs/btrfs/compression.c:104 fs/btrfs/compression.c:1363 fs/btrfs/compression.c:323) btrfs kernel: end_workqueue_fn (fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1923) btrfs kernel: btrfs_work_helper (fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:326) btrfs kernel: process_one_work (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 ./include/linux/jump_label.h:212 ./include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2312) kernel: worker_thread (./include/linux/list.h:292 kernel/workqueue.c:2455) kernel: ? process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2397) kernel: kthread (kernel/kthread.c:377) kernel: ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:332) kernel: ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:301) kernel: </TASK>

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: prevent copying too big compressed lzo segment Compressed length can be corrupted to be a lot larger than memory we have allocated for buffer. This will cause memcpy in copy_compressed_segment to write outside of allocated memory. This mostly results in stuck read syscall but sometimes when using btrfs send can get #GP kernel: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x841551d5c1000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI kernel: CPU: 17 PID: 264 Comm: kworker/u256:7 Tainted: P OE 5.17.0-rc2-1 #12 kernel: Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] kernel: RIP: 0010:lzo_decompress_bio (./include/linux/fortify-string.h:225 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:322 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:394) btrfs Code starting with the faulting instruction =========================================== 0:* 48 8b 06 mov (%rsi),%rax <-- trapping instruction 3: 48 8d 79 08 lea 0x8(%rcx),%rdi 7: 48 83 e7 f8 and $0xfffffffffffffff8,%rdi b: 48 89 01 mov %rax,(%rcx) e: 44 89 f0 mov %r14d,%eax 11: 48 8b 54 06 f8 mov -0x8(%rsi,%rax,1),%rdx kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb110812efd50 EFLAGS: 00010212 kernel: RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: 000000009ca264c8 RCX: ffff98996e6d8ff8 kernel: RDX: 0000000000000064 RSI: 000841551d5c1000 RDI: ffffffff9500435d kernel: RBP: ffff989a3be856c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff98996e6d8000 kernel: R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 000841551d5c1000 kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98a09d640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 kernel: CR2: 00001e9f984d9ea8 CR3: 000000014971a000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 kernel: Call Trace: kernel: <TASK> kernel: end_compressed_bio_read (fs/btrfs/compression.c:104 fs/btrfs/compression.c:1363 fs/btrfs/compression.c:323) btrfs kernel: end_workqueue_fn (fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1923) btrfs kernel: btrfs_work_helper (fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:326) btrfs kernel: process_one_work (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 ./include/linux/jump_label.h:212 ./include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2312) kernel: worker_thread (./include/linux/list.h:292 kernel/workqueue.c:2455) kernel: ? process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2397) kernel: kthread (kernel/kthread.c:377) kernel: ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:332) kernel: ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:301) kernel: </TASK>

Why

A bounds error lets data be written beyond the intended memory region, potentially corrupting control data.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation without authentication after a user interaction. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → Out-of-bounds Write → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
None: unauthenticated exploitation is possible
User interaction
Required interaction required
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration: a standard category for the underlying weakness.
CWE-787

CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write. The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRNonePrivileges required: The attacker does not need an account or existing privileges.UIRequiredUser interaction: Another user must perform an action for exploitation to succeed.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CHighConfidentiality impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.IHighIntegrity impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
UnauthenticatedCWE-787
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-1898Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service

Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux-Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder einen unspezifischen Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-0133Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

0487-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0489-1 du 12 février 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250489-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0494-1 du 12 février 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250494-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0499-1 du 13 février 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250499-1 Bulletin de sécurité SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0517-1 du 13 février 2025 https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250517-1 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48912 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48912 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48923 Référence CVE CVE-2023-4244 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4244 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52489 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52489 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52923 Référence CVE CVE-2024-26810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26810 Référence CVE CVE-2024-35863 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863 Référence CVE CVE-2024-36476 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36476 Référence CVE CVE-2024-39282 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282 Référence CVE CVE-2024-43913 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CV

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0870Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2021-47622 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48788 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48789 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48790 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48791 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48791 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48799 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48844 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48844 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48901 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48901 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48911 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48911 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48935 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48935 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48943 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48943 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48944 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48944 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48945 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48945 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52610 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52610 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52752 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52766 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766 Référence CVE CVE-2023-52915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0840Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48913 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48914 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48917 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48919 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48920 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48921 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48926 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48930 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0779Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48913 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48914 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48914 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48915 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48915 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48916 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48916 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48917 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48917 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48918 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48918 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48919 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48919 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48920 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48920 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48921 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48921 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48923 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48923 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48924 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48924 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48925 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48925 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48926 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48926 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48927 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48927 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48928 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48928 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48929 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48930 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48930 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48931 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
a6e66e6f8c1b685e11b778bef614480a9c1a5278 < 8df508b7a44cd8110c726057cd28e8f8116885eb; a6e66e6f8c1b685e11b778bef614480a9c1a5278 < e326bd06cdde46df952361456232022298281d16; a6e66e6f8c1b685e11b778bef614480a9c1a5278 < 741b23a970a79d5d3a1db2d64fa2c7b375a4febb; 5.15
Fixed
< 5.15; 5.15.26 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.16.12 ≤ 5.16.*; 5.17 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 22 Aug 2024 · Last source change 5 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC · CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds Write

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceCNA
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-53802
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceNIST NVD
NVD statusNVD modified after enrichment

Core structured fields are present and their contributing authorities are shown above.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-48923 · cve.blacktree.nl