BlackTreeIndependent security intelligence
← Back to the CVE catalogue
Full vulnerability report · 2024
CVE-2022-48817High confidence

net: dsa: ar9331: register the mdiobus under devres

Linux · Linux

5.5MediumCVSS 3.1
Recommended action
Scheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
Distribution package intelligence

Ubuntu vendor package status

Canonical’s release and source-package findings are shown separately from local repository availability.

1 package state
Repository candidate not checked

A published vendor fix does not prove that a matching update is enabled and installable on a particular asset. Confirm the local package candidate before scheduling remediation.

Ubuntu releaseSource packageVendor stateFixed versionEvidence
Ubuntu 24.04 LTSnoble · standard archivelinux-raspi-realtimeAffected, no fix publishedCanonical OVAL identifies this running kernel flavour as affected and does not publish a fixed package version in this definition.Not published in this feedCanonical record ↗Source updated 8 Sept 2026
Optional official sources

National CERT insights
?CERT means Computer Emergency Response Team; CSIRT is the closely related term Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Select the national-authority views to include. The exact source language is shown on each matched advisory. Your choice is remembered on this device and encoded in the shareable URL.

Official European source

ENISA European Vulnerability Database

Official EUVD identifiers, advisory evidence and known-exploited context. Missing fields are not treated as evidence of low risk.

1 current
ENISA EUVD identifier

EUVD-2022-53696

No EUVD known-exploited evidence

ENISA has published the identifier mapping but no EUVD description has been stored yet.

EUVD state
Present in the current official mapping
Known exploitation
Not present in the current ENISA EUVD known-exploited dataset. This is not proof of no exploitation.
ENISA score
Not supplied in the stored EUVD record
Advisory evidence
No linked advisory details stored yet
Recommended actionScheduled

Medium technical severity with no CISA KEV confirmation; remediate through the normal risk-based patch cycle unless local exposure raises the priority.

Patch available
01

What, why and how

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: ar9331: register the mdiobus under devres As explained in commits: 74b6d7d13307 ("net: dsa: realtek: register the MDIO bus under devres") 5135e96a3dd2 ("net: dsa: don't allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres") mdiobus_free() will panic when called from devm_mdiobus_free() <- devres_release_all() <- __device_release_driver(), and that mdiobus was not previously unregistered. The ar9331 is an MDIO device, so the initial set of constraints that I thought would cause this (I2C or SPI buses which call ->remove on ->shutdown) do not apply. But there is one more which applies here. If the DSA master itself is on a bus that calls ->remove from ->shutdown (like dpaa2-eth, which is on the fsl-mc bus), there is a device link between the switch and the DSA master, and device_links_unbind_consumers() will unbind the ar9331 switch driver on shutdown. So the same treatment must be applied to all DSA switch drivers, which is: either use devres for both the mdiobus allocation and registration, or don't use devres at all. The ar9331 driver doesn't have a complex code structure for mdiobus removal, so just replace of_mdiobus_register with the devres variant in order to be all-devres and ensure that we don't free a still-registered bus.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: ar9331: register the mdiobus under devres As explained in commits: 74b6d7d13307 ("net: dsa: realtek: register the MDIO bus under devres") 5135e96a3dd2 ("net: dsa: don't allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres") mdiobus_free() will panic when called from devm_mdiobus_free() <- devres_release_all() <- __device_release_driver(), and that mdiobus was not previously unregistered. The ar9331 is an MDIO device, so the initial set of constraints that I thought would cause this (I2C or SPI buses which call ->remove on ->shutdown) do not apply. But there is one more which applies here. If the DSA master itself is on a bus that calls ->remove from ->shutdown (like dpaa2-eth, which is on the fsl-mc bus), there is a device link between the switch and the DSA master, and device_links_unbind_consumers() will unbind the ar9331 switch driver on shutdown. So the same treatment must be applied to all DSA switch drivers, which is: either use devres for both the mdiobus allocation and registration, or don't use devres at all. The ar9331 driver doesn't have a complex code structure for mdiobus removal, so just replace of_mdiobus_register with the devres variant in order to be all-devres and ensure that we don't free a still-registered bus.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

What

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dsa: ar9331: register the mdiobus under devres As explained in commits: 74b6d7d13307 ("net: dsa: realtek: register the MDIO bus under devres") 5135e96a3dd2 ("net: dsa: don't allocate the slave_mii_bus using devres") mdiobus_free() will panic when called from devm_mdiobus_free() <- devres_release_all() <- __device_release_driver(), and that mdiobus was not previously unregistered. The ar9331 is an MDIO device, so the initial set of constraints that I thought would cause this (I2C or SPI buses which call ->remove on ->shutdown) do not apply. But there is one more which applies here. If the DSA master itself is on a bus that calls ->remove from ->shutdown (like dpaa2-eth, which is on the fsl-mc bus), there is a device link between the switch and the DSA master, and device_links_unbind_consumers() will unbind the ar9331 switch driver on shutdown. So the same treatment must be applied to all DSA switch drivers, which is: either use devres for both the mdiobus allocation and registration, or don't use devres at all. The ar9331 driver doesn't have a complex code structure for mdiobus removal, so just replace of_mdiobus_register with the devres variant in order to be all-devres and ensure that we don't free a still-registered bus.

Why

The current structured CVE record identifies a security weakness, but the root cause requires confirmation in the linked vendor material.

How

An attacker operating through local access may attempt exploitation with low privileges. If successful, the issue may cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor.

02

Exploit reality and attack path

CVSS severity, EPSS forecast probability, public exploit material and CISA-confirmed exploitation are separate signals.

Observed exploitation
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
No confirmed evidence

No CISA KEV match was present at the last successful refresh. This means no confirmation from that source, not proof of no exploitation.

Public PoC / exploit material
?Confirmed exploitation and public exploit material are separate signals. Attacks can occur without public proof-of-concept or exploit code.
None recorded

No exploit-tagged reference or CISA SSVC proof-of-concept state is currently recorded. Research may still exist outside the structured feeds.

Likely attack path
local access → vulnerable operation → cause the confidentiality, integrity or availability impact described by the vendor
Attack surface
Local
Privileges required
Low: a basic authenticated account is required
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low: no specialised conditions are recorded
Security boundary
Unchanged: impact remains within the vulnerable component's security authority
Weakness
?CWE means Common Weakness Enumeration.
CWE not yet assigned
CVSS vector
?CVSS means Common Vulnerability Scoring System. The vector records the metric values used to calculate technical severity.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Common Vulnerability Scoring System 3.1: the compact vector below is decoded into plain language.

AVLocalAttack vector: The attacker needs local access to the vulnerable system.ACLowAttack complexity: No specialised conditions are required beyond attacker-controlled input.PRLowPrivileges required: The attacker needs basic user-level privileges.UINoneUser interaction: No action by another user is required.SUnchangedScope: The security impact remains within the vulnerable component's authority.CNoneConfidentiality impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.INoneIntegrity impact: No direct loss is represented by this metric.AHighAvailability impact: A successful attack can cause a major loss.
Post-exploitation / living off the land
The issue can support a local privilege or sandbox boundary transition; normal system utilities may then be available in the gained context.
A

Official authority intelligence

Only matched European and national findings are included. Language selectors and unavailable sources are omitted.

BSI · German · WID-SEC-W-2024-1625Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMware

d?id=CVE-2022-48801 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48802 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48804 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48806 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48819 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48819 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48830 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48830 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48831 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48831 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48832 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48832 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48834 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0717Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48814 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48820 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48821 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
CERT-FR · French · CERTFR-2024-AVI-0693Multiples vulnérabilités dans le noyau Linux de SUSE

d?id=CVE-2022-48807 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48809 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48810 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48811 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48811 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48812 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48813 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48814 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48814 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48815 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48816 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48817 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48818 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48820 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48820 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48821 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48821 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48822 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48822 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48823 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48824 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48824 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48825 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825 Référence CVE CVE-2022-48826 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=

Official advisory
03

Patch and workaround

Operational remediation based on structured source evidence.

Status
?Patch availability is based on structured fixed-version fields and authoritative update references. If no fix is verified, check the vendor advisory before making a change.
Patch available
Affected
ac3a68d56651c3dad2c12c7afce065fe15267f44 < 475ce5dcf2d88fd4f3c213a0ac944e3e40702970; ac3a68d56651c3dad2c12c7afce065fe15267f44 < aae1c6a1d3d696fc33b609fb12fe744a556d1dc5; ac3a68d56651c3dad2c12c7afce065fe15267f44 < f1842a8cb71de4d7eb75a86f76e88c7ee739218c; ac3a68d56651c3dad2c12c7afce065fe15267f44 < 50facd86e9fbc4b93fe02e5fe05776047f45dbfb; 5.9
Fixed
< 5.9; 5.10.101 ≤ 5.10.*; 5.15.24 ≤ 5.15.*; 5.16.10 ≤ 5.16.*; 5.17 ≤ *
Action
Review the linked authoritative reference and apply the recorded fixed release appropriate to the affected product branch.
Workaround
No verified workaround is recorded. Limit untrusted access and use least privilege until authoritative guidance is available.
04

Evidence and provenance

Published 16 Jul 2024 · Last source change 11 May 2026, 18:47 UTC · CWE not yet assigned

CVE recordCVE.org · 5.2
CVSS sourceNIST NVD
EPSS source
?The date BlackTree first stored a score for this CVE from the daily FIRST EPSS feed.
FIRST · tracked since 2026-08-14
European sourceENISA EUVD · EUVD-2022-53696
Product sourceCNA
Remediation sourceCVE/CNA references
CWE sourceUnavailable
NVD statusNVD enriched

Missing structured fields: CWE classification. Missing data is not evidence of low risk; review the primary advisory.

Material change intelligence

What changed after publication

View recent updates →

No material field changes have been recorded since change tracking began. Routine source refreshes and cosmetic edits are intentionally excluded.

Material fields only · duplicate refreshes suppressed · history retained for the configured operational retention period
Technical terms and abbreviations used in this report
CVE
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures: the public identifier for one disclosed vulnerability.
CVSS
Common Vulnerability Scoring System: a technical severity framework; it is not patching priority by itself.
EPSS
Exploit Prediction Scoring System: FIRST's estimate of the probability that exploitation activity will be observed in the next 30 days; it is a forecast, not confirmation.
CWE
Common Weakness Enumeration: the standard category describing the underlying software or hardware weakness.
CNA
CVE Numbering Authority: an organisation authorised to assign and publish CVE records.
CISA ADP
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Authorized Data Publisher: structured enrichment added to a CVE record.
NVD
National Vulnerability Database: NIST's enrichment service for CVE records.
CERT / CSIRT
A computer security incident response team that publishes warnings or coordinates incident response.
PoC
Proof of concept: public material that demonstrates or helps reproduce exploitation.
CSAF
Common Security Advisory Framework: a machine-readable format for security advisories.
LoTL
Living off the land: abuse of legitimate tools or system functions during an attack.
Free version - for non-commercial use only.CVE-2022-48817 · cve.blacktree.nl